反行政垄断公益诉讼研究

发布时间：2018-02-28 10:10

本文关键词： 反行政垄断公益诉讼原告资格举证责任法律适用判决形式　出处：《华中科技大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：30余年的政治经济体制改革使我国取得了举世瞩目的发展成就，但我国仍存在着大量不符合现代民主政治和市场经济制度要求的因素，行政垄断正是其中一种。行政垄断源于行政权力的违法使用，是行政法部门的重点规制对象。但是，现行行政诉讼制度对规制行政垄断力有不逮。当前，我国正在探索建立行政公益诉讼制度，以规范行政主体的行为，加强对公共利益的保护。行政垄断是一种严重侵害公共利益的违法行为，，利用行政公益诉讼规制行政垄断是一种合理的和可行的选择。文章从讨论反行政垄断公益诉讼的界定入手，通过介绍行政垄断、行政公益诉讼的概念和本质得出反行政垄断公益诉讼的内容与特征，并分析反行政垄断公益诉讼与我国公平竞争关系、政府形象及公信力、竞争者和消费者权益等公共利益之间的联系。这部分的目的在于为整篇文章的论述提供合理性支撑。之后文章进入具体问题的讨论，研究了反行政垄断公益诉讼制度中贯穿诉讼始终的四个不可回避的制度：在反行政垄断公益诉讼的原告资格部分中，提出我国应当建立多元的原告资格体系，赋予检察机关、社会组织和个人起诉权利。在举证责任分配部分中，分析了该种诉讼中原告、被告的举证责任和人民法院的调查取证权力。在法律适用判决形式中，重点分析规章在反行政垄断公益诉讼中的地位，认为应取消规章的参照地位。建议根据行政垄断的特征，增加禁令判决的类型。
[Abstract]:After more than 30 years of political and economic reform, China has made remarkable achievements in its development, but there are still a large number of factors that do not meet the requirements of modern democratic politics and market economy system. Administrative monopoly is just one of them. Administrative monopoly originates from the illegal use of administrative power and is the key regulation object of administrative law department. However, the current administrative litigation system has no power to regulate administrative monopoly. China is exploring the establishment of administrative public interest litigation system in order to standardize the behavior of administrative subjects and strengthen the protection of public interests. Administrative monopoly is a serious violation of public interests. It is a reasonable and feasible choice to use administrative public interest litigation to regulate administrative monopoly. Starting with the discussion of the definition of the public interest litigation against administrative monopoly, this paper introduces the concept and essence of administrative monopoly, and draws the content and characteristics of the public interest litigation against administrative monopoly. It also analyzes the relationship between anti-administrative monopoly public interest litigation and fair competition in China, government image and credibility. The link between competitors and public interests such as consumer rights and interests. This part aims to provide reasonable support for the entire article. Then the article enters into the discussion of specific issues. This paper studies four unavoidable systems in the system of public interest litigation against administrative monopoly: in the part of plaintiff qualification of the public interest litigation against administrative monopoly, the author puts forward that our country should establish a pluralistic plaintiff qualification system and endow the procuratorial organ. In the distribution of the burden of proof, the burden of proof of the plaintiff, the defendant and the power of the people's court to investigate and collect evidence are analyzed in the part of the distribution of the burden of proof by social organizations and individuals. Based on the analysis of the status of regulations in public interest litigation against administrative monopoly, it is suggested that the referential status of regulations should be abolished, and that the types of injunctive judgments should be increased according to the characteristics of administrative monopoly.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】