我国地方行政层级设置优化研究
[Abstract]:The local administrative hierarchy is one of the important contents of the modern national system construction, and also an important part of the local administrative management system. Since ancient times, the central government of the successive dynasties in China has taken multi-layer settings for the local administration, the local government level has long been in the two and three levels, the virtual level and the actual level wander, and the ancient China The governance practice of the government has left a rich heritage for us to optimize the local government level setting. In modern times, with the spread of the capitalist democratic thought, the setting of local administrative levels appeared completely different from the feudal times, reflecting the trend of the times and the progress of the society. After the founding of new China, China communism was Communist. The party has established a national dictatorship of the proletariat. Facing the new situation and development goals and drawing on the historical experience, the party has innovated the local administrative level setting of our country. In order to ensure the effectiveness and stability of the State Administration, the effectiveness and stability of the State Administration are guaranteed by the horizontal comparison of the world in the vast majority of the world. The administrative hierarchy of the country is subject to the historical and cultural traditions of each country, the size of the land, the traffic and communication and other infrastructure conditions, the population and density, the state structure, the economic and social system and the level of scientific and technological development. However, in terms of the local administrative level setting of various countries, the level of management is relatively small and the scope of management is large. It is the important characteristic of different and China, and it also provides reference and ideas for China to promote the reform of local administrative level. The reform of local administrative level can not be separated from the adjustment of administrative division. It will inevitably increase or reduce the scope of administrative jurisdiction, which will affect every aspect of the society and the people in the related areas. Reasonable local administrative hierarchy can be set up. It is of great significance to reduce the administrative cost, improve the management efficiency and meet the political needs of the grass-roots people. It is of great significance for the state to achieve good governance. At present, China has set up four administrative levels of "provincial - City - County - township", more than the other countries in the world, and the rapid economic and social development of our country and the continuous reform of the market economy system. In the background of deepening and accelerating the process of urbanization, the four level administrative system has gradually not adapted to the current development needs, and the reform of the current hierarchical system has become a common understanding of the society. This paper has applied the research methods such as case analysis, comparative analysis, literature analysis, standardization and regulation, and studied the flattening of government. The theory of the relationship between the administrative region and the economic zone, the relationship between the management level and the scope of management, and the guidance of the theory of governance and good governance on the promotion of the administrative level, the situation of the administrative level setting and reform of the typical Western countries in the world is compared horizontally, and the existing reform cases in our country are analyzed, and our country has been obtained. The conclusion is that, under the background of informatization and rapid urbanization in China, the local government needs to use modern management science and technology fully for reference and change government function oriented by public service and strive to build a flat level of government level. To reduce the administrative level, improve the administrative efficiency, reduce the administrative cost and meet the needs of the citizens. Therefore, the government needs to carry out the necessary decentralization and decentralization, introduce the concept of enterprise, enlighten citizen consciousness, cultivate civil society, develop social organization and so on. In the realization path, the Provincial direct management County, the city direct town reform are all the local administrative levels of our country. The concrete practice of the reform will gradually become the main content of the administrative hierarchy system reform of the local government in our country. At the same time, we must pay attention to the particularity of the national conditions and the heritage of the history in the reform. For the four administrative levels of the provincial, city, county and township level in our country, the breakthrough point of the reform is put on the county level and the township level. Taking into account the fact that China's provincial system has a long time and a higher degree of public recognition, this paper, through the analysis of the current reform cases, finds that the focus of the theory and practice of the administrative level reform in our country is mainly focused on the reform of provincial management and county, which is a breakthrough in the reform of local wide area government relations, but it has not been considered. To the problem of optimizing the level of urban government level, this paper puts forward the view that the management level of the municipal government is reformed, and provides the way to realize the reform. This is the innovation of this article. The administrative hierarchy system reform of our country is very important, involving all aspects of the state and society, and will affect every corner. The factors that affect the reform and promotion include the political economy, history, culture, science and technology, geography and many other aspects. This brings a lot of difficulty to the comprehensive grasp and control of the analysis and selection.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D630
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 董娟;;关于减少行政层级的思考——对行政派出模式的一种审视[J];理论与改革;2009年01期
2 董娟;;关于减少行政层级的思考——行政派出模式的一种审视[J];中国行政管理;2009年05期
3 朴贞子;柳亦博;;效率视角下行政层级优化途径探索[J];中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报;2010年02期
4 孙玮静;;论行政层级变革及省管县[J];才智;2012年05期
5 陈玉宇;;必须变革城市行政层级权力体制[J];理论学习;2013年06期
6 谢庆奎;杨宏山;;对我国地方行政层级设置的思考[J];红旗文稿;2004年04期
7 石萍;;简化行政层级 推进基层建设[J];农村工作通讯;2004年05期
8 李国芳;;建国前后中共减少城市行政层级的尝试——以石家庄、天津等为线索[J];党的文献;2007年02期
9 王菊梅;;公共服务与行政层级优化[J];中州学刊;2007年05期
10 龚维斌;;减少地方政府行政层级乃大势所趋[J];办公室业务;2008年09期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 孙平;;精简行政层级研究[A];“构建和谐社会与深化行政管理体制改革”研讨会暨中国行政管理学会2007年年会论文集[C];2007年
2 杨霞;;行政层级监督中信息不对称问题及其治理对策分析[A];“构建和谐社会与深化行政管理体制改革”研讨会暨中国行政管理学会2007年年会论文集[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 陈济朋;行政层级调整空间很大[N];新华每日电讯;2013年
2 冯建忠;从放权试点看行政层级改革[N];中国改革报;2006年
3 记者 马义 王振宏 石庆伟;消减行政层级,,重构基层政务[N];新华每日电讯;2014年
4 中国政法大学党委书记、教授 石亚军;政府职能转变到位真难[N];北京日报;2014年
5 王克群;减少行政层级的路径选择[N];济南日报;2005年
6 孙广厦;县级政府“自主性决策”探析[N];中国县域经济报;2014年
7 ;简化行政层级 推进基层建设[N];21世纪经济报道;2004年
8 本报记者 姚建莉;城市功能提升决定“镇改市”成败[N];21世纪经济报道;2014年
9 青锋 于宏伟;东瀛之旅:感受日本的“监督”[N];法制日报;2009年
10 本报记者 陈邦明;善治之城:有限政府大作为[N];南方日报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王珂;当代中国专区制度研究[D];中共中央党校;2011年
2 林洁;转型期我国县域政府管理创新研究[D];武汉理工大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李睿;政治哲学视野下的政府行政层级改革思考[D];四川师范大学;2007年
2 秦江;我国地方行政层级设置优化研究[D];南京大学;2014年
3 李文涛;我国地方行政层级体制改革的探究[D];西南政法大学;2009年
4 郑伟;我国地方行政层级改革与省管县研究[D];电子科技大学;2009年
5 赵艳飞;我国地方行政层级改革推进研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2010年
6 高芳;省直管县:我国政府行政层级改革研究[D];新疆大学;2010年
7 马一超;行政层级监督法律问题研究[D];河北大学;2008年
8 贾红军;新中国成立以来我国地方行政层级改革研究[D];新疆大学;2011年
9 蒋丽静;从“省管县”看我国地方行政层级改革[D];外交学院;2014年
10 杨侦;行政层级结构中市辖区一级政府改革研究[D];贵州财经学院;2010年
本文编号:2141113
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2141113.html