英汉政治话语中语法隐喻与语式差异关系的对比研究

发布时间：2021-08-31 17:56

　　语法隐喻是系统功能语言学中的一个重要概念,对于理解语言与语境的关系很重要。因此,语境视角下的语法隐喻研究吸引了国内外众多研究者。在系统功能语言学领域,由于语域理论在语境研究中扮演重要角色,因而相关研究主要集中在语法隐喻和语域三变量,即语场、语旨和语式之间关系上。尽管先前已有关于语法隐喻和语式关系的探索,但目前相关研究仍不够深入,尤其是对于语法隐喻分布与不同语式关系的探讨。鉴于此,本研究力图通过对比分析英汉政治话语来探索语法隐喻和语式差异间的关系。根据研究目标,本研究主要解决两个核心问题:1)语法隐喻的使用如何与政治话语中的语式差异相联系;2)英汉政治话语在语法隐喻和语式差异关系上有什么差异。本研究结合定量和定性研究方法来解决这两个核心问题。研究语料由15个英语政治语篇和15个汉语政治语篇构成,它们又分别构成三种具有不同语式的语篇类型,即政治报告、政治演讲和政治访谈。此外,本研究分别选取Halliday的语法隐喻分析框架和杨延宁的语法隐喻分析模式来处理英语语料和汉语语料。在探讨语法隐喻和语式差异关系前,本研究首先分别对英汉政治话语中的语式级阶和语法隐喻分布级阶进行了描述和界定。语式级阶主... 

【文章来源】：华东师范大学上海市 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直属院校

【文章页数】：200 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Aims and Significance
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Grammatical Metaphor
        2.1.1 From Lexical Metaphor to Grammatical Metaphor
        2.1.2 GM Studies Abroad
        2.1.3 GM Studies in China
    2.2 The Variable of Mode
        2.2.1 Register Theory
        2.2.2 Characterizations of Mode
        2.2.3 Previous Studies on the Relationships between GM and Mode
    2.3 Contrastive Studies on GM in English and Chinese
    2.4 Previous Studies on Political Discourses
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework and Research Methodology
    3.1 Theoretical Grounds for GM
        3.1.1 Three Metafunctions in SFL
        3.1.2 Stratal Realignment between Semantics and Lexicogrammar
    3.2 Classification of GM in Halliday’s Model
        3.2.1 Ideational GM
        3.2.2 Interpersonal GM
    3.3 Classification of GM in Chinese
        3.3.1 Ideational GM in Chinese
        3.3.2 Interpersonal GM in Chinese
    3.4 Research Methodology
        3.4.1 Research Questions
        3.4.2 Collection and Processing of Language Materials
        3.4.3 Research Methods and Procedures
Chapter Four Analysis of English and Chinese Political Discourses
    4.1 Mode Differentiation in Various Text Types
        4.1.1 Mode Differed in Two Continua
        4.1.2 Mode Differed in Complexity
        4.1.3 Interpretation on Lexical Density and Grammatical Intricacy
    4.2 GM Deployment in English Political Discourses
        4.2.1 Identification of GM Instances in English Political Discourses
        4.2.2 Quantification of GM Instances in English Political Discourses
    4.3 GM Deployment in Chinese Political Discourses
    4.4 Comparison of GM Deployment in English and Chinese Political Discourses
Chapter Five Relationship between GM and Mode Differentiation
    5.1 Relationship between GM and Mode in English Political Discourses
        5.1.1 The Mapping Relations between Lexical Density and Ideational GMScales
        5.1.2 Functional Interpretations of GM-mode Relationships in English Texts
        5.1.3 Relationship between Interpersonal GM and Grammatical Intricacy
    5.2 Relationship between GM and Mode in Chinese Political Discourses
        5.2.1 The Mapping Relations between Lexical Density and Ideational GMScales
        5.2.2 Functional Interpretations of GM-mode Relationships in Chinese Texts
        5.2.3 Relationship between Interpersonal GM and Grammatical Intricacy .104
    5.3 Comparison of GM-mode Relationships between English and Chinese PoliticalDiscourses
        5.3.1 Difference in GM’s Contributions to the Complexity between TwoLanguages
        5.3.2 Difference in GM’s Functions of Constructing Texts between TwoLanguages
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Summary of Major Findings
    6.2 Implications of the Study
    6.3 Limitations and Suggestions
Bibliography
Appendix Ⅰ Sources of Language Materials
Appendix Ⅱ Analysis of Language Materials
Appendix Ⅲ Statistical Results by SPSS



本文编号：3375351