比较安全学中比较方法、空间、维度及循环研究

发布时间：2018-08-04 09:48

【摘要】：为进一步完善比较安全学学科体系,推动比较安全学的研究工作,从比较方法的角度研究比较安全学。构建比较安全学领域的SBCS体系,将比较划分为简单比较(S)、基本比较(B)、复合比较(C)和科学比较(S)4个层次。基于编辑学、政治学科知识,从部位、背景、模式、质量、特征、时空、属性和基础8个类别出发,将基本比较方法划分为16种,以此为基础探讨基本比较方法、综合比较方法和科学比较方法之间的关系,绘制比较方法基础图。基于比较学文献,提出比较空间和比较维度的概念。在传统比较流程基础上,引入定性的反馈特性和定量的稳定特性,构建比较安全学研究的内部比较循环和外部反馈循环双循环结构。结果表明,所构建的双循环结构有很好的兼容性,适用于各领域中的问题的比较研究。
[Abstract]:In order to further improve the subject system of comparative security and promote the research work of comparative safety, we study comparative safety from the perspective of comparative methods. The SBCS system in the field of comparative security will be divided into 4 levels: simple comparison (S), basic comparison (B), compound comparison (C) and scientific comparison (S). From the 8 categories of position, background, pattern, quality, characteristic, space-time, attribute and foundation, the basic comparison method is divided into 16 types. On this basis, the basic comparison method, the relationship between the comprehensive comparison method and the scientific comparison method are discussed, and the basic diagram of the comparison method is drawn. Based on the comparative literature, the comparison space and the comparative dimension are put forward. On the basis of the traditional comparison process, the qualitative feedback and quantitative stability characteristics are introduced, and the internal comparative cycle and external feedback loop double loop structure of comparative safety study are constructed. The results show that the constructed double loop structure has good compatibility and is suitable for the comparative study of problems in various fields.
【作者单位】：河南理工大学安全科学与工程学院;河南理工大学瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理国家重点实验室培育基地;煤炭安全生产河南省协同创新中心;
【分类号】：X91

【相似文献】