江苏环境治理效率评估与影响因素研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 08:22

本文选题：环境治理　切入点：技术效率　出处：《东南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在中国改革开放后30多年的工业化过程中,中国走的依然是“高投入、高消耗、高污染、低效益”的传统发展模式,没有完全避免“先污染后治理”所带来的恶果。江苏省是中国经济最发达的省份之一,在经济增长的同时,污染物排放总量也持续增加,从2000年起,工业废气排放总量直线上升,到2010年翻了三倍。环境污染问题给环境带来了巨大压力,导致环境质量下降,为可持续发展增加了阻碍。但目前针对江苏省内的环境治理效率的研究较少,因此,对于江苏省内环境治理的效率研究就具有十分重要的现实意义和理论参考价值。本文采用了DEA-CCR模型分析了2007～2010年江苏省的环境治理效率,发现环境治理效率低在省内是一种普遍现象。从区域划分来看,苏南大部分地区都表现为DEA无效率,而苏中和苏北地区的环境治理效率高于苏南地区。从废水治理和废气治理的单项效率来看,废气治理的治理无效更为严重,徐州市和苏南地区等工业发达地区普遍表现出废气治理效率低。采用Malmquist全要素生产率分解分析环境治理效率的时序变化发现,全省绝大部分地区的环境治理效率都产生了退步,同时还发生了技术水平退步。Tobit回归的结果发现城市化水平的提高、产业结构中第二产业比重的增大、经济规模的扩大对环境治理效率存在负面影响,这与粗放型、高污染的经济发展方式是分不开的。贸易开放程度、人均收入水平、人口密度的提高对环境治理效率存在正面影响。国际贸易带来的技术扩散有利于环境治理效率的提高；随着人均收入水平的提高,居民对环境质量的要求也随之提高,以利于激励政府加强环境治理。最后,根据前文的实证分析结果,给出了提高江苏省环境治理效率的政策建议。
[Abstract]:The process of industrialization in the 30 years of China after the reform and opening up, go Chinese is still a "high input, high consumption, high pollution and low efficiency of the traditional mode of development", not completely avoid "caused by pollution" consequences. Jiangsu province is one of the most developed economy China provinces in economic growth at the same time, the total amount of pollutant emissions continue to increase, since 2000, total industrial emissions soared to 2010, doubled three times. The problem of environmental pollution has brought tremendous pressure on the environment, leading to the decline in environmental quality, increase the obstacles to sustainable development. But the current research on environmental governance efficiency in Jiangsu province is less, therefore, it has very important theoretical and practical significance and reference value for the study of the efficiency of environmental governance in Jiangsu province. This paper uses DEA-CCR model to analyze 2007~2010 years of Jiangsu province environmental governance. The rate of discovery, low efficiency of environmental governance in the province is a common phenomenon. From the regional point of view, most of the area of South of Jiangsu showed no DEA efficiency, and the efficiency of environmental governance in central and northern regions is higher than the South of Jiangsu area. From the wastewater and waste gas treatment of single governance efficiency, waste gas treatment is invalid is more serious, industrial the city of Xuzhou and South of Jiangsu and other developed areas generally showed low efficiency of waste gas treatment by Malmquist. TFP decomposition efficiency of environmental governance time-series analysis found that most of the province's environmental governance efficiency has a step backwards, also had technical setbacks.Tobit regression shows that the city improvement, increase the proportion of the second industry in the industrial structure, expand economic scale has a negative impact on the efficiency of environmental governance, and the extensive, high pollution and economic development The way is inseparable. Trade openness, the level of per capita income, the increase of population density has a positive impact on environmental governance efficiency. The technology diffusion of international trade brings an environment conducive to improve governance efficiency; with the increase of per capita income level, residents on environmental quality requirements also increased, in order to encourage the government to strengthen the environment governance. Finally, according to the empirical analysis results, Jiangsu province is given to improve the efficiency of environmental governance policy recommendations.

【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：X321

【相似文献】