东北地区城镇污水厂处理工艺优选模型及绩效评估体系研究
[Abstract]:The selection of sewage treatment process is one of the most important steps in the design stage of a new sewage plant. Whether the reasonable and applicable sewage treatment process can be selected according to the actual situation of the sewage plant directly determines the construction investment expenditure of the sewage plant. To deal with the emission standards and operating management difficulties and other indicators. However, most of the process selection in the design stage of the traditional sewage treatment plant depends on the design experience and subjective choice of the relevant designers, and there is no objective and fair evaluation method. It is necessary to set up a set of process selection evaluation methods with wide applicability and reasonable and reliable results to optimize the treatment process. Firstly, the monitoring data of 31 well-run sewage treatment plants in Northeast China are investigated. The design parameters of wastewater treatment plants in North China are statistically analyzed from the aspects of selection of process, design scale, discharge index and treatment effect. The analysis shows that the selection process is ANO, cast process is the most common, the design scale of large and medium-sized sewage plants is basically the same, but the large and medium-sized sewage plants occupy the absolute advantage in the treatment capacity. In addition, except for the three sewage plants, GB secondary standard is adopted, and there is great room for improvement in the discharge standard. Secondly, according to the investigation and analysis, this paper adopts the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), through the analysis of the main influencing factors of the actual value of the sewage plant, establishes the evaluation model of the process optimization of the northern wastewater treatment plant, and quantifies the qualitative indexes through the mathematical model. The advantages and disadvantages of the process are analyzed by intuitive weighted comparison. The model was applied to the process selection and optimization of Qingyuan Town sewage treatment Plant in Liaoning Province. The CASS process and ANO process were determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The weights of the evaluation indexes of the double oxidation ditch process and the MSBR process are W = (0.267, 0.052, 0.052, 0.095, 0.267, 0.267) T, and the weights of the scheme layer to the index layer are calculated by the judgment matrix. Finally, the total weight is 0.295,0.276,0.260,0.169. After comparison, the CASS process is the first choice, and the formula 渭 = 0.267a 0.052b 0.052c 0.095d 0.267e 0.267f is established to simplify the model. In this paper, the performance evaluation system of municipal wastewater treatment plant is established to verify the results of AHP method, and the average value of the selected process is compared with the average value of other wastewater treatment plants. By setting up the standard value of each index, the performance evaluation method is applied to the process optimization evaluation of the small sewage treatment plant in the upper reaches of the large-scale houses, and the evaluation dimension of the wastewater treatment plant is evaluated by the standard value of the performance evaluation method. By fitting out the regression equation of the standard value of each evaluation index of the wastewater treatment plant, it is verified that the process selected by each water plant can be superior to the standard level, and the operation parameters of the process are suggested according to the score of each dimension. Through the comparison of dimensions, it is found that the design of Qingyuan sewage plant needs to be improved in the aspect of construction cost. The SS dimension score of Nanzagi sewage plant is lower than that of other water plants. It is concluded that the advantages of CASS and contact oxidation process in low energy consumption are obvious.
【学位授予单位】:哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:X703
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 莫金荣;;纬编仿毛涤盖棉产品的生产工艺探讨[J];针织工业;1988年05期
2 闫继红;赵凤鸣;;催化燃烧器的工艺选择及其催化剂应用[J];河北化工;2006年06期
3 邓仁健;任伯帜;陈军;;小型污水厂工艺选择的多层次模糊灰关联聚类分析[J];中国给水排水;2010年11期
4 赵宝江;;乡镇污水理处途径[J];环境研究与监测;2012年01期
5 潘永刚;发酵气体中二氧化碳的回收与工艺选择[J];四川食品与发酵;1998年Z1期
6 姚建斌;R─P工艺尾洗、氟吸收及其在我厂的应用[J];磷肥与复肥;1996年03期
7 T.P.Shaw P.W.Hughe ,徐正斌,颜映霄;二氧化碳脱除工艺的优选[J];国外油田工程;2003年01期
8 张宏伟;熊学文;;石灰乳制备系统工艺选择与设计[J];有色冶金设计与研究;2014年01期
9 周滢;梁光义;曹佩雪;苏咏梅;;芍石护睛胶囊的制备工艺[J];中国实验方剂学杂志;2010年07期
10 侬建福,李保平,蔺国盛,彭寿;用古巴镍钴物料制取硫酸盐的工艺选择[J];有色金属(冶炼部分);2000年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 本报记者 李映;FPGA:架构创新与工艺提升并行[N];中国电子报;2013年
2 本报通讯员 聂鑫;我市洗车业 该好好“洗洗”了[N];济宁日报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 马昕;论雕漆工艺在服装配饰中的应用[D];北京服装学院;2016年
2 杨宇;东北地区城镇污水厂处理工艺优选模型及绩效评估体系研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2015年
3 李明悦;冀东南堡油田2号构造集中处理站工艺选择[D];中国石油大学(华东);2013年
4 李继;基于模糊工程集理论的露天矿生产工艺评价[D];辽宁工程技术大学;2007年
5 史强;A/O工艺在高氮废水处理中的应用及优化[D];西南交通大学;2014年
6 蒋猛;多西紫杉醇的冻干制剂工艺及质量研究[D];重庆大学;2009年
7 汤鑫;灰色关联分析在污水处理工艺比选中的应用研究[D];长安大学;2014年
8 冯杰;城市污水处理工艺综合比选研究[D];重庆大学;2007年
,本文编号:2455863
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/huanjinggongchenglunwen/2455863.html