当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 交通工程论文 >

旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青结构性能动力评价研究

发布时间:2018-04-19 18:03

  本文选题:复合路面 + 结构性能 ; 参考:《福州大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:目前有关旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青复合路面结构的理论研究、数值模拟研究已十分广泛,但基于现场监测和具体结构试验评价的比较研究则相对缺乏。鉴于此,本文结合具体试验路工程,重点开展旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青结构性能动力评价方法和工程实践研究。具体包括复合路面落锤弯沉特性动力数值模拟分析,水泥混凝土加铺沥青复合路面的落锤弯沉评价方法、现场复合路面试验路的动力试验检测,不同复合路面结构性能的现场评估,具体研究成果与结论如下:复合路面结构在脉冲荷载作用下的弯沉盆曲线,离荷载作用中心点距离越远,相应各测点的弯沉值越小,各个测点的弯沉值与距荷载作用中心点距离成近似反比关系。各点弯沉时程曲线存在上下波动现象,随时间逐渐衰减于零。复合路面弯沉盆曲线大致为一条凸曲线,一般弯沉盆曲线存在明显拐点,反映沥青加铺层与旧水泥混凝土面板模量的突变,路面顶面沥青结构模量相对面板越柔、厚度越大折线越大。对复合路面弯沉敏感性最高的是旧水泥混凝土板模量,其次是土基模量,沥青混合料模量。其中,土基模量并不改变复合路面的折线形式,但会改变整体的弯沉幅值(整体平行下移),以及最后几个弯沉点离开零点的幅度。对于水泥混凝土加铺沥青路面,荷载中心弯沉越大,且曲率越连续,说明旧水泥混凝土板破损破碎越严重。基层模量与沥青面层模量的大小关系,影响复合路面荷载中心点弯沉随沥青面层厚度增加的的变化特性。旧水泥稳定基层模量小于沥青加铺层模量时,沥青加铺层厚度越大,复合路面弯沉越小;当旧水泥稳定基层模量大于沥青加铺层模量时,沥青加铺层厚度越大,复合路面弯沉越大。提出了复合路面承载力指标和分级。提出以水泥混凝土路面代表弯沉为下限、沥青路面平均弯沉为上限,采用荷载作用中心点弯沉d0评价复合路面性能接近沥青路面的趋势的柔化系数指标和分级。试验路对八种典型复合路面结构的评价发现,“白加黑”复合路面结构比“白改黑”承载能力高,其中,应力吸收层+12cmAC复合路面承载力最高;“白改黑”复合路面比“白加黑”更具柔性,其中,旧水泥混凝土板碎石化+20cm沥青面层复合路面结构柔化系数最高,柔性最好。综合考虑复合路面承载力和柔化系数,对于旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青改建复合路面工程中,建议旧水泥混凝土板采取打裂处理方式。
[Abstract]:At present, the theoretical research on asphalt composite pavement structure of old cement concrete pavement is very extensive, but the comparative study based on field monitoring and concrete structure test evaluation is relatively lacking.In view of this, this paper focuses on the dynamic evaluation method and engineering practice of asphalt overlay structure of old cement concrete pavement combined with the concrete test road project.It includes the dynamic numerical simulation analysis of the overlay deflection characteristics of composite pavement, the evaluation method of concrete overlay asphalt composite pavement, and the dynamic test test of the field composite pavement test road.The concrete research results and conclusions of the field evaluation of the performance of different composite pavement structures are as follows: the more distance from the center of load, the smaller the deflection value of each measuring point of composite pavement structure under the action of pulse load.The deflection value of each measuring point is approximately inversely proportional to the distance from the center of the load.The curve of deflection time history of each point fluctuates up and down, and gradually attenuates to zero with time.The deflection basin curve of composite pavement is about a convex curve, and the curve has obvious inflection point, which reflects the sudden change of the modulus of asphalt overlay and old cement concrete slab, and the softer the modulus of asphalt structure on the top of pavement is relative to the slab.The greater the thickness, the larger the broken line.The modulus of the old cement concrete slab is the most sensitive to the deflection of the composite pavement, followed by the modulus of the soil foundation and the modulus of the asphalt mixture.Among them, the modulus of soil foundation does not change the curve form of composite pavement, but it will change the deflection amplitude of the whole (the whole parallel downward shift, and the amplitude of the last few deflection points leaving zero point).For cement concrete overlay asphalt pavement, the greater the deflection of the load center and the more continuous curvature, the more serious the damage and breakage of the old cement concrete slab.The relationship between base modulus and asphalt surface modulus affects the variation of load center deflection of composite pavement with the increase of asphalt surface thickness.When the modulus of old cement stabilized base is smaller than that of asphalt overlay, the greater the thickness of asphalt overlay, the smaller the deflection of composite pavement, and the greater the thickness of asphalt overlay is when the modulus of old cement stabilized base is greater than that of asphalt overlay.The greater the deflection of the composite road.The bearing capacity index and classification of composite pavement are put forward.Taking the representative deflection of the cement concrete pavement as the lower limit and the average deflection of the asphalt pavement as the upper limit, the flexibility coefficient index and classification of the composite pavement performance close to the trend of asphalt pavement are evaluated by the load action center point deflection d0.The evaluation of eight typical composite pavement structures shows that the load-carrying capacity of "White plus Black" composite pavement is higher than that of "White to Black", among which, the bearing capacity of 12cmAC composite pavement with stress absorption layer is the highest."White to black" composite pavement is more flexible than "white plus black". Among them, the softness coefficient of old cement concrete slab 20cm asphalt pavement is the highest and the flexibility is the best.Considering the bearing capacity and softness coefficient of the composite pavement, it is suggested that the old cement concrete slab should be cracked in the asphalt overlay reconstruction of the old cement concrete pavement.
【学位授予单位】:福州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:U416.217

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 赵军;谈至明;;水泥混凝土路面板角弯沉的测点偏移影响及修正[J];公路交通科技;2007年08期

2 刘忠根;孟莹琳;白日华;祝克;;公路沥青路面动态弯沉与静态弯沉关系研究[J];中外公路;2008年03期

3 马凌宇;;等值弯沉盆平移假定与应用设想[J];中国建设信息;2008年14期

4 林小平;袁捷;凌建明;谈至明;;刚性路面弯沉盆面积指数反演改进方法[J];中国公路学报;2009年03期

5 吴彪;刘玉健;;弯沉盆特征值在公路工程养护中的应用[J];现代交通技术;2010年02期

6 王旭东,郭大进,邓学钧;动态弯沉盆几何特性分析[J];东南大学学报;1999年05期

7 阳恩慧;邱延峻;蒋鑫;;基于有限元分析的弯沉盆惰性点理论研究[J];重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版);2008年02期

8 赵军;唐伯明;谈至明;蒙华;;基于弯沉指数的水泥混凝土路面板角脱空识别[J];同济大学学报(自然科学版);2006年03期

9 侯芸;毛菊良;郭忠印;;刚柔复合路面结构弯沉盆形态分析[J];同济大学学报(自然科学版);2007年02期

10 陈南;曹长伟;凌建明;魏宏;;基于弯沉盆的半刚性基层脱空判识方法[J];同济大学学报(自然科学版);2014年05期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 董元帅;唐伯明;朱洪洲;;FWD脱空检测评定方法研究[A];自主创新与持续增长第十一届中国科协年会论文集(3)[C];2009年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 张德津;基于路面变形速度的弯沉测量方法[D];武汉大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 陈智敏;基于动态弯沉测试的高速公路沥青路面的结构强度评价[D];长沙理工大学;2014年

2 张秋虾;旧水泥混凝土路面加铺沥青结构性能动力评价研究[D];福州大学;2014年

3 董元帅;沥青路面动态弯沉综合修正系数研究[D];重庆交通大学;2010年

4 刘钰;基于线阵CCD的路面弯沉盆检测方法研究[D];长安大学;2012年

5 贾鹏飞;刚性路面脱空识别弯沉盆形状系数法[D];郑州大学;2009年

6 李鹏;实测弯沉盆反演路面结构层模量的研究[D];山东科技大学;2007年

7 文俊;施工过程中沥青路面各结构层弯沉演变规律研究[D];长沙理工大学;2013年

8 特日格乐;路基落锤弯沉与回弹弯沉数值关系与数值分析研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2014年

9 彭俊文;旧水泥混凝土路面板角脱空状况的评定[D];长沙理工大学;2010年

10 贾想;FWD检测数值的动态分析与反演[D];西南交通大学;2009年



本文编号:1774146

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiaotonggongchenglunwen/1774146.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户29937***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com