新余市经开大道采用市政与公路不同计价模式的对比分析
发布时间:2018-10-30 20:01
【摘要】:由于投资和管理体制的不同,,我国的道路桥梁等基本投资建设项目分为市政工程与交通工程建设项目,分属于住房和城乡建设部与交通运输部两大部门进行建设与行业管理。因此,在道路桥梁工程方面,形成了市政工程与公路工程两套不同的计价模式和工程造价管理模式,它们各自有一整套不同的计价办法和估算、概预算定额,在造价管理和控制方面也有不同的相关规定。在计价方法中,市政工程主要遵照《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》(GB50500-2008),公路工程主要遵照《公路工程基本建设项目概算预算编制办法》(JTG B06-2007);在计价定额中,市政工程主要遵照各个省市编制的市政工程定额,公路工程主要遵照全国统一的公路工程概算、预算定额。对于同一个道路桥梁建设项目,采用市政工程或公路工程计价和建设管理模式,与工程造价直接相关的造价管理文件、招投标文件、工程量清单等从形式到内容都有很大不同;同时由于市政工程或公路工程计价定额及计价程序的不同,即使采用相同的人工、材料、机械台班概预算单价,其工程估算、概预算也会得到不同的造价结果。其主要原因是市政与公路工程定额子目划分不一致,相同定额子目人工材料机械消耗量不同,部分取费项目和取费费率、计价程序不同。本论文对目前道路桥梁工程在市政与公路项目上的造价管理、计价体系、工程定额等方面进行系统地对比分析,找出其差别和联系。最后选取新余市经开大道工程项目,按照市政工程和公路工程两种不同的计价模式,分别编制工程量清单、工程预算,并根据计算结果,对市政与公路工程的定额和预算价格水平进行进一步对比分析。
[Abstract]:Because of the difference of investment and management system, the basic investment projects such as roads and bridges in our country are divided into municipal engineering and traffic engineering construction projects, which belong to the construction and industry management of the Ministry of Housing, Urban-Rural Construction and the Ministry of Transport. Therefore, in the field of road and bridge engineering, two sets of different valuation modes and project cost management models have been formed for municipal engineering and highway engineering, each of which has a whole set of different valuation methods and estimates, estimates and budget quotas. In cost management and control there are also different relevant provisions. In the method of valuation, municipal engineering mainly complies with "GB50500-2008", and highway project mainly follows "method of preparing estimate budget of highway engineering capital construction project" (JTG B06-2007). In the valuation quota, the municipal engineering mainly complies with the municipal engineering quota compiled by each province and city, and the highway project mainly complies with the national unified highway engineering estimate and budget quota. For the same road and bridge construction project, the pricing and construction management mode of municipal engineering or highway engineering is adopted, and the cost management documents, bidding documents, bill of quantities and so on, which are directly related to the project cost, are very different from each other in form and content. At the same time, because of the different valuation quota and pricing procedure of municipal engineering or highway engineering, even if the same manpower, materials, machinery class budget unit price is used, the project estimate and estimate budget will also get different cost results. The main reason is that the division of quota items between municipal and highway engineering is not consistent, the same quota items are different in mechanical consumption of artificial materials, the partial collection items and fee rates, and the pricing procedures are different. In this paper, the cost management, pricing system and project quota of the current road and bridge projects in municipal and highway projects are systematically compared and analyzed to find out their differences and connections. Finally, according to the two different pricing modes of municipal engineering and highway engineering, the bill of quantities and project budget are drawn up and calculated according to the results of the calculation. The quota and budget price level of municipal and highway engineering are further compared and analyzed.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:U415.13
本文编号:2301030
[Abstract]:Because of the difference of investment and management system, the basic investment projects such as roads and bridges in our country are divided into municipal engineering and traffic engineering construction projects, which belong to the construction and industry management of the Ministry of Housing, Urban-Rural Construction and the Ministry of Transport. Therefore, in the field of road and bridge engineering, two sets of different valuation modes and project cost management models have been formed for municipal engineering and highway engineering, each of which has a whole set of different valuation methods and estimates, estimates and budget quotas. In cost management and control there are also different relevant provisions. In the method of valuation, municipal engineering mainly complies with "GB50500-2008", and highway project mainly follows "method of preparing estimate budget of highway engineering capital construction project" (JTG B06-2007). In the valuation quota, the municipal engineering mainly complies with the municipal engineering quota compiled by each province and city, and the highway project mainly complies with the national unified highway engineering estimate and budget quota. For the same road and bridge construction project, the pricing and construction management mode of municipal engineering or highway engineering is adopted, and the cost management documents, bidding documents, bill of quantities and so on, which are directly related to the project cost, are very different from each other in form and content. At the same time, because of the different valuation quota and pricing procedure of municipal engineering or highway engineering, even if the same manpower, materials, machinery class budget unit price is used, the project estimate and estimate budget will also get different cost results. The main reason is that the division of quota items between municipal and highway engineering is not consistent, the same quota items are different in mechanical consumption of artificial materials, the partial collection items and fee rates, and the pricing procedures are different. In this paper, the cost management, pricing system and project quota of the current road and bridge projects in municipal and highway projects are systematically compared and analyzed to find out their differences and connections. Finally, according to the two different pricing modes of municipal engineering and highway engineering, the bill of quantities and project budget are drawn up and calculated according to the results of the calculation. The quota and budget price level of municipal and highway engineering are further compared and analyzed.
【学位授予单位】:南昌大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:U415.13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 牛武鹏;公路工程概预算中应注意的几个问题[J];山西建筑;2005年04期
2 杨忠良;杨学军;;浅谈我国公路造价管理模式[J];内蒙古科技与经济;2007年15期
3 郭珠远;铁路工程与公路、市政工程定额及取费水平对比[J];铁路工程造价管理;2001年01期
4 耿立芬;采用3种定额编制概预算对工程造价的影响[J];铁路工程造价管理;2004年03期
5 唐蕾;于恒栋;;浅析公路工程与市政工程的造价区别[J];中国西部科技;2010年34期
6 张竹;;国内公路工程和市政工程的造价问题[J];中国水运(下半月);2010年07期
7 王丽丽;苏红生;;浅谈公路和市政工程概预算计价中的差别[J];中国科技信息;2012年08期
本文编号:2301030
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiaotonggongchenglunwen/2301030.html