当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 基因论文 >

转基因技术之亚里士多德“四因说”分析

发布时间:2018-03-06 00:08

  本文选题:转基因技术 切入点:本体论 出处:《自然辩证法通讯》2017年05期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:比较分析转基因技术与传统育种技术存在的"原因"——"四因"后发现:在质料因上,传统育种技术是"选择"好的质料而转基因技术是"制作"新的质料;在形式因上,传统育种技术是"改良"自然物种形式而转基因技术是"创造"人工物种形式;在动力因上,在传统育种技术中人力是"助推力"而在转基因技术中人力是"主导力";在目的因上,在传统育种技术中内在的目的依然剩余不少而在转基因技术中内在的目的正在被人类的外在的目的所取代。由此,传统育种技术培育的作物依旧保留着不少内在的本性,而转基因技术培育的作物的本性主要是由人类外在的赋予的。因此,转基因技术与传统育种技术具有本体论上的本质性差异。
[Abstract]:By comparing and analyzing the "causes" of transgenic technology and traditional breeding technology, it is found that the traditional breeding technology is the "choice" good material and the transgenic technology is the "making" new material, and the form factor is the form factor, in the material factor, the traditional breeding technology is the "choice" good material, and the transgenic technology is the "making" new material. Traditional breeding techniques are "improved" forms of natural species, while transgenic technologies are "created" forms of artificial species; in terms of dynamics, In traditional breeding technology, human power is "booster power", while in transgenic technology, human power is "leading power". There is still a lot of inherent purpose in the traditional breeding technology, and the intrinsic purpose in the transgenic technology is being replaced by the external purpose of human being. As a result, the crops cultivated by the traditional breeding technology still retain a lot of inherent nature. The nature of crops cultivated by transgenic technology is mainly endowed by human being, therefore, there is an ontological difference between transgenic technology and traditional breeding technology.
【作者单位】: 湖州师范学院政治学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金青年项目“转基因技术风险的不确定性及其治理研究”(15CZX019)
【分类号】:S188


本文编号:1572476

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiyingongcheng/1572476.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户20941***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com