从Altmetrics看新技术论文的传播——以“基因编辑技术”论文为例

发布时间：2018-04-02 12:10

本文选题：Altmetrics指标　切入点：新技术　出处：《情报理论与实践》2017年06期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]通过对新技术论文的Altmetrics指标进行分析,探索新技术论文的传播特征和规律。[方法/过程]以"基因编辑技术"相关论文为实证分析对象,通过Altmetrics,来考察其用作测度新技术传播指标的有效性。通过在PLOS网站检索"genome edit~*",下载406篇相关论文的ALMs,对论文的引用频次(Scopus)与在线浏览、下载、分享与传播数据进行正态性检验、相关性分析及曲线拟合,分析PLOS系列期刊论文的社会影响力和学术影响力。[结果/结论]实验表明:指标间相关性差异较大,高度相关的两变量组合是PLOS Total与Mendeley(r=0.829,p=0.01),Twitter与PLOS Total、Figshare、Scopus、Mendeley微弱相关,Figshare与PLOS Total、Mendeley微弱相关。期刊官网对论文的传播优势明显,但论文的使用与引用与Twitter的相关度都很低,显示出Altmetrics指标在揭示新技术传播方面存在一定的缺陷。Mendeley与PLOS Total最佳的拟合曲线为立方函数。[局限]研究的数据源为PLOS系列期刊,因此,数据的全面性方面存在一定的欠缺,结论能否推广至其他学科,有待进一步研究补充。
[Abstract]:[objective / significance] through the analysis of the Altmetrics index of the new technology paper, to explore the transmission characteristics and law of the new technology paper. [method / process] take the "gene editing technology" related paper as the empirical analysis object, This paper investigates the validity of Altmetricsas a measure of the spread of new technologies. By searching "genome editorials *" on the PLOS website and downloading 406 related papers, the citation frequency of the papers is compared with that of online browsing, downloading, sharing and disseminating data for normality testing. Correlation analysis and curve fitting were used to analyze the social and academic influence of PLOS series of journal papers. The highly correlated combination of two variables is PLOS Total and Mendeleyn 0.829p0.01. the weak correlation between PLOS Total and PLOS Total Figshareor Scopusshare and PLOS Total Mendeley is weak. There is a significant advantage in the dissemination of papers on the official Journal website, but the correlation between the use of papers and citations and Twitter is very low. It shows that the Altmetrics index has some defects in revealing the spread of new technology. The best fitting curve between Mendeley and PLOS Total is a cubic function. [limited] the data source studied is PLOS series journals, so there is a certain deficiency in the comprehensiveness of the data. Conclusion it is necessary to further study whether it can be extended to other subjects.
【作者单位】：南开大学图书馆;
【基金】：2016年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“网络时代开放教育资源引进与利用中的知识产权问题研究”(项目编号:16ATQ002) 2016年度南开大学亚洲研究中心资助项目“高品质科技期刊的Altmetrics分析”(项目编号:AS 1606) 2015年度天津市哲学社会科学规划重点项目“MOOC背景下的图书馆应对策略研究”(项目编号:TJTQ15-001)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：G206;Q78

【相似文献】