第一部分 慢性中性粒细胞白血病临床特征及基因突变的研究 第二部分 慢性粒单核细胞白血病基因突变的研究及预后意义
[Abstract]:Objective To investigate the clinical manifestations, morphology, cytogenetics, and gene mutation characteristics and prognosis of chronic neutrophil leukemia (CNL) patients.Methods 27 suspected patients with CNL were retrospectively diagnosed according to the WHO classification criteria in 2008. To determine the prognosis, JAK2 V617F mutation was detected by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR), CSF3R exon 14-17, ASXL1 exon 12, SETBP1 exon 4, CALR exon 9 and MPL exon 10 were directly sequenced to identify the mutation type. Generation sequencing was used to analyze the mutations of 112 common genes in hematological malignancies. The clinical manifestations, morphology, cytogenetics and gene mutations of CNL patients were analyzed. Two patients were diagnosed as unidentified monoclonal immunoglobulin disease (MGUS) with CNL. The median age of onset was 64 (43-80) years in 16 patients with CNL, and 75 (12/16) in males. The median hemoglobin level at diagnosis was 114 (81-154) g/L. The median white blood cell count was 41.20 (26.05-167.70)*10 g/L, and the median platelet count was 238 (91-394)*109/L. The median percentage of peripheral blood immature granulocytes was 2 (0-9)%, the median percentage of peripheral blood primitive cells was 0 (0-0.5)%, the median percentage of bone marrow primitive cells was 1 (0-4.5)%, and the median level of bone marrow fibrosis was 1 (0-3). Except for 1 (1 (1,7) (p32, q11), 1 + 21 clonal abnormality. Among the 16 CNL patients, the detection rate of CSF3R T618I mutation was 100% (16/16), one with CSF3R W791X mutation, ASXL1 mutation was 81% (13/16), G646WfsX12 (8 cases), Y591X (2 cases), S871SfsX4 (1 case), R404X (1 case) and Q976X (1 case), respectively. 63% (10/16), according to the detection frequency, were D868N (4 cases), 1871T (3 cases), G870S (1 case), G870D (1 case) and D874N (1 case). There were 9 cases with CSF3R T618I, ASXL1 and SETBP1 mutations, 4 cases with CSF3R T618I and ASXL1 mutations, 1 case with CSF3R T618I and SETBP1 mutations, and 1 case without CSF3R T618I and SETBP1 mutations. Two patients had mutations in ASXL1 and SETBP1. In addition, only one patient with CALRK385fs * 47 mutation was obtained by direct sequencing. All CNL patients had no JAK2 V617F mutation and MPL mutation. One patient with CSF3RT618I mutation but did not meet the WHO (2008) CNL diagnostic criteria had mutations in SETBP1 but did not detect mutations in ASXL1, JAK2 V617. All the mutations were heterozygous except one G870S homozygous mutation found in SETBP1 gene. The ASXL1 mutation and SETBP1 mutation were compared with the corresponding wild type in terms of sex ratio, age distribution, hemoglobin level. There were no significant differences in white blood cell count, platelet count, peripheral blood immature granulocyte ratio, peripheral blood primitive cell ratio, bone marrow primitive cell ratio, and whether myelofibrosis was above grade 1. There was no correlation between ASXL1 mutation and SETBP1 mutation. The median survival time of 16 CNL patients was 26 (95% CI 20-32) months. After the survival data of the patients undergoing blood stem cell transplantation, we found that the prognostic factors of CNL patients were WBC (>50 *109/L) survival time was shorter than that of 50 *109/L patients (vs. 39 months in November, P = 0.005). Sex, age (>60 years old), anemia (anemia < 120g/L for men, 110g/L for women, P = 0.063), and ASXL1 protrusion. Conclusion 1. CSF3R T618I gene mutation can be used as the main criteria for the diagnosis of CNL. CNL patients are often associated with ASXL1 and SETBP1 gene processes. Chromosome karyotype abnormalities were not specific in myeloid tumors. Chromosome karyotype abnormalities were not a poor prognostic factor. 3. The median survival time of CNL patients was 26 months. WBC (>50 *109/L) at diagnosis was a poor prognostic factor. Methods 141 patients with CMML were retrospectively diagnosed according to WHO classification criteria in 2008. The prognosis was determined by follow-up. The mutations of ASXL1 exon 12, SETBP1 exon 4, TET2 exon 3-11 and SRSF2 exon 1 were detected by direct sequencing. Results The median age of 141 CMML patients was 63 (18-85) years, and 95 (67%) were male. The median hemoglobin level was 88 (43-166) g/L at diagnosis, and the median white blood cell count was 21.88 (3.01-117). 57 *109/L, median neutrophil absolute value was 7.07 (0.30-66.91) *109/L, median monocyte absolute value was 3.72 (1.02-57.72) *109/L, median platelet count was 78 (4-1001) *109/L. A total of 65 (46%) patients with CMML had mutations in the ASXL1 gene (only senseless mutations and frameshift mutations were considered to be mutations), 25 (18%) had mutations in the SETBP1 gene. 46 patients (33%) had mutations in TET2 gene and 41 patients (29%) had mutations in SRSF2 gene. The mutations in ASXL1 gene were mainly frameshift mutations, of which 59 were frameshift mutations (38 were G646WfsX12), 7 were nonsense mutations, and 1 was frameshift mutation and nonsense mutation. There were 22 frameshift mutations, 19 missense mutations and 7 nonsense mutations in TET2 gene. One patient had missense mutations and nonsense mutations. One patient had both missense, nonsense and frameshift mutations. SRSF2 mutations were mainly missense mutations, P95H, P95L, P95R and frameshift mutations. All of the above mutations were heterozygous. ASXL1 was associated with SETBP1 gene mutation. TET2 was associated with SRSF2 gene mutation. Compared with wild-type patients, patients with TET2 mutation had a higher proportion of age (> 65 years) and bone marrow primordial cells (> 10%). There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between patients with SRSF2 mutation and those with wild type. Multivariate analysis showed that 141 patients with CMML survived, hemoglobin levels, and weeks. The presence or absence of IMCs and ASXL1 mutation were independent prognostic factors for CMML. According to the Mayo prognostic model, the median overall survival (MS) was not achieved in the low-risk group, 28 months in the medium-risk group and 18 months in the high-risk group. Month. A likelihood ratio test for the two prognostic score systems showed that the molecular Mayo prognostic model was superior to the Mayo prognostic model (-2 log likelihood ratio was 627 and 654 respectively, P = 0.001). The relative risk of ASXLlmut/TET2mut. The degree of mutation was 4.7 (95% CI 2.2-10.3; P = 0.000), 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.2; P = 0.025) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.6-2.5; P = 0.521). Conclusion 1. The mutation frequencies of ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2 and SRSF2 genes in CMML patients were 46%, 18%, 33% and 29%, respectively. ASXL1 mutation is an independent and unfavorable prognostic factor for the overall survival of CMML patients. Incorporating ASXL1 mutation into the prognostic score system helps to better distinguish the prognostic risk. 4. TET2 mutation was detected in CMML patients with ASXL1 mutation, suggesting worse prognosis. Prognosis.
【学位授予单位】:北京协和医学院
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R733.72
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Ferrara F.;Amato C.;张剑萍;;亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶基因突变导致卵巢过度刺激综合征1例[J];世界核心医学期刊文摘(妇产科学分册);2005年11期
2 Combi R;Dalprà L.;Ferini-Strambi L.;Tenchini M.L;袁海峰;;额叶癫痫与促肾上腺皮质激素释放激素基因突变的关系[J];世界核心医学期刊文摘(神经病学分册);2006年05期
3 智刚;苏成芝;;基因突变带来的启示[J];医学与哲学;1991年02期
4 潘宏铭;宋修山;;人群基因突变的检测[J];浙江医学情报;1995年02期
5 刘广志;新确定的基因与痴呆有联系[J];英国医学杂志(中文版);2000年03期
6 姚华,王国荃;砷与基因关系的研究进展[J];地方病通报;2001年01期
7 张苏明,刘小红,倪黎,金庆文,郭庆荣,宫道华;急性淋巴细胞性白血病与P~(53)基因突变的相关性研究[J];实用儿科临床杂志;2002年05期
8 庞庆丰,郭冬平,李晓,陈琪,范乐明;一个新的低密度脂蛋白受体基因突变位点[J];中华医学杂志;2003年05期
9 黄琰,李若葆;吸烟与肺癌基因突变的关系[J];潍坊医学院学报;2004年02期
10 易彦;张广森;;非肌性肌球蛋白重链9基因突变相关疾病[J];国外医学.输血及血液学分册;2005年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 吴竞生;徐修才;周荣富;方怡;王学锋;翟志敏;王鸿利;;β链基因突变引起一例遗传性无纤维蛋白原血症[A];中华医学会第八次全国血液学学术会议论文汇编[C];2004年
2 刘艳;雷小兵;彭振辉;肖生祥;王俊民;周欣;耿松梅;李政宵;;先天性大疱性鱼鳞病样红皮病1家系的基因突变研究[A];2006中国中西医结合皮肤性病学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
3 肖生祥;刘艳;雷小兵;彭振辉;王俊民;周欣;耿松梅;李政宵;;先天性大疱性鱼鳞病样红皮病1家系的基因突变研究[A];中华医学会第十二次全国皮肤性病学术会议论文集[C];2006年
4 马绍刚;方佩华;吕枚;许静;李宁;陈慧;冯洁;;先天性甲状腺功能减退症基因突变研究[A];天津市核学会2005年学术交流会论文汇编[C];2005年
5 杨芳;金佩佩;王学锋;李薇;丁秋兰;王冠军;王鸿利;;2例新的基因突变导致遗传性蛋白S缺陷症[A];中华医学会第七次全国检验医学学术会议资料汇编[C];2008年
6 王贵;裘卫东;;基因在疼痛与镇痛中的影响[A];浙江省医学会疼痛学分会成立大会暨首届浙江省医学会疼痛学分会学术年会论文汇编[C];2011年
7 孟岩;张续德;施惠平;赵时敏;姚凤霞;苏亮;黄尚志;;颅额鼻综合征的基因突变研究[A];第八次全国医学遗传学学术会议(中华医学会2009年医学遗传学年会)论文摘要汇编[C];2009年
8 曹林枝;;P53基因及其分子生物学作用[A];广西生物化学与分子生物学会第六次学术研讨会论文摘要[C];2003年
9 吴雪琼;张俊仙;李洪敏;梁建琴;钟敏;王巍;;结核分支杆菌耐药基因的研究[A];中国防痨协会全国学术会议大会学术报告[C];2001年
10 杨芳;金佩佩;王学锋;丁秋兰;王鸿利;李薇;王冠军;;2例新的基因突变导致遗传性蛋白S缺陷症[A];第11次中国实验血液学会议论文汇编[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 报道员 周谷风;基因突变是好是坏[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
2 孙浩;基因检测:为防病摘除还健康的器官?[N];新华每日电讯;2006年
3 张民;英展开癌症相关基因突变测定研究[N];中国医药报;2007年
4 本报记者 李禾;吸烟导致的基因突变可代代相传?[N];科技日报;2010年
5 医学博士 科学松鼠会成员 致桦;基因检测是与非[N];中国经营报;2010年
6 本报记者 王丹;天赋基因检测:预测未来还是娱乐大众[N];健康报;2010年
7 江苏省中医院转化医学中心 赖仁胜;基因检测放任自流态势需扭转[N];健康报;2011年
8 本报实习记者 杨璇;“基因保存”服务没价值[N];北京科技报;2010年
9 实习生 刘冰玉;检测癌症基因能否一纸完成?[N];科技日报;2012年
10 记者 耿建扩 通讯员 李晋陶 程益聪;人类8种新发基因突变被发现[N];光明日报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 肖珊;维吾尔族2型糖尿病相关基因的多态性及基因—基因、基因—环境交互作用研究[D];新疆医科大学;2015年
2 于韶荣;恶性肿瘤患者血浆KRAS基因突变检测[D];南京大学;2011年
3 杨琳;晚期非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变状态的血清多肽质谱研究[D];中国人民解放军军事医学科学院;2016年
4 马亚琳;非综合征型耳聋患者基因突变热点筛查及一个耳聋家系MYO7A基因新突变分析[D];山东大学;2016年
5 崔亚娟;第一部分 慢性中性粒细胞白血病临床特征及基因突变的研究 第二部分 慢性粒单核细胞白血病基因突变的研究及预后意义[D];北京协和医学院;2016年
6 冯磊;基于临床生化指标的冠心病预测模型建立及其与基因易感性关联的探索研究[D];南方医科大学;2016年
7 金佩佩;遗传性FⅫ缺陷症分子机制及血小板相关疾病研究[D];上海交通大学;2015年
8 茅江峰;不同基因突变对特发性低促性腺激素性性腺功能减退症患者的临床特点、隐睾和生精疗效的影响[D];北京协和医学院;2013年
9 杨昭庆;云南省两种遗传性血液疾病的基因突变研究[D];中国协和医科大学;2001年
10 李冰;第一部分 原发性骨髓纤维化患者基因突变的研究 第二部分 原发性骨髓纤维化患者的细胞遗传学研究 第三部分 血清铁蛋白是中国骨髓增生异常综合征中危-1组患者的独立预后因素[D];北京协和医学院;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李娟;Fabry病GLA基因变异与临床表现的相关研究[D];石河子大学;2015年
2 杨浩;Peutz-Jeghers综合征的STK11基因突变研究[D];川北医学院;2015年
3 周双才;非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变状态与中医体质的相关性研究[D];福建中医药大学;2015年
4 王庆泊;胃肠道间质瘤c-kit基因检测临床意义的研究(附119例分析)[D];河北医科大学;2015年
5 钱晓燕;EGFR及KRAS基因突变临床检测方法学比较及其影响因素分析[D];北京协和医学院;2015年
6 顾棚;偶蹄目TLR1-4基因的分子进化研究[D];四川农业大学;2014年
7 王薇;ARVC患者和正常人群桥粒基因突变及SNP比较研究[D];南京医科大学;2013年
8 郭秀;92例骨髓增殖性肿瘤JAK2V617F基因的检测及其临床意义[D];大连医科大学;2015年
9 蔡浩;青海晚期NSCLC患者EGFR基因突变状态与临床病理特征及疗效的关系[D];青海大学;2016年
10 陈兴旺;TTR基因突变c.-743A>T对该基因表达的影响[D];遵义医学院;2016年
,本文编号:2237540
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/jiyingongcheng/2237540.html