公民认识论视野下我国转基因食品争议治理研究

发布时间：2018-11-03 13:28

【摘要】：随着科学技术的不断发展,科学争议相伴而生,面对争议如何实施有效地治理,是当前形势下亟待解决的问题。对比多种研究路径最终选取符合综合分析思路且体现多元参与科学治理模式的公民认识论作为分析维度,并结合我国转基因食品争议现状进行深入研究,分析我国在治理争议过程中参与主体的行为特征以及存在的问题,尝试总结出我国公民认识论的特征,为形成合理的政府、专家、公众三者和谐互动的科学治理模式提供参考。第一章阐明本文的研究意义、研究目的和研究方法;综合分析了国内外学者面对科学争议带来的巨大挑战是如何从科学治理角度寻求回应、解决之法的。第二章通过探究科学争议出现的原因,凸显当前科学争议带来了诸多方面的挑战,面对挑战急需寻找有效的科学治理模式来予以应对。第三章从参与主体视角介绍公民认识论维度下的科学治理的新思路,具体区分政府、专家、公众在科学治理过程中扮演的不同角色、履行的不同职责。第四章由中国知网的数据统计结果得出我国转基因食品争议的焦点是关于其安全性之争。第五章结合我国转基因食品安全性争议现状,以公民认识论的视角分析我国的科学治理措施和存在的问题,并尝试归纳出治理过程中体现的公民认识论特征,为后续研究提供理论补充和参考。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, scientific disputes come into being, and how to solve them effectively is an urgent problem to be solved. Comparing various research paths to select the citizen epistemology which accords with the comprehensive analysis thought and embodies the multiple participation in the scientific governance model as the analysis dimension, and carries on the thorough research in the light of the current situation of the genetically modified food dispute in our country. This paper analyzes the behavior characteristics and existing problems of the participants in the process of governing disputes in China, tries to summarize the characteristics of the epistemology of Chinese citizens, and provides a reference for the formation of a reasonable scientific governance model of harmonious interaction among the government, experts and the public. The first chapter clarifies the significance, purpose and method of this paper, and analyzes comprehensively how scholars at home and abroad, facing the enormous challenge brought by scientific disputes, seek a response from the angle of scientific governance to solve the problem. The second chapter explores the causes of scientific disputes, highlights the current scientific disputes brought many challenges, facing the challenge is urgent to find an effective scientific governance model to deal with. The third chapter introduces the new ideas of scientific governance under the dimension of citizen epistemology from the perspective of participating subject, and specifically distinguishes the different roles and duties of government, experts and the public in the process of scientific governance. The fourth chapter draws the conclusion that the focus of the dispute is about the safety of transgenic food. The fifth chapter analyzes the scientific governance measures and existing problems in China from the perspective of citizen epistemology, and tries to sum up the characteristics of civil epistemology in the process of governance. To provide theoretical supplement and reference for follow-up research.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TS201.6;C912.6

【参考文献】