当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 农业技术论文 >

东北典型垦区土壤物理性质与肥力关系及其对造林的响应

发布时间:2018-01-06 04:25

  本文关键词:东北典型垦区土壤物理性质与肥力关系及其对造林的响应 出处:《东北林业大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 土壤物理性质 土壤肥力指标 农田 杨树人工林 针叶林 阔叶林


【摘要】:长期不合理开发导致东北黑土肥力下降,伴随严重土壤物理性质恶化,但针对物理性质重要性及造林恢复可能性研究较少。因此本研究以东北地区土壤为研究对象,测定不同物理性质(土壤孔隙度、比重、容重、比表面积、土壤含水量、土壤最大吸湿水)及其它理化和肥力指标(土壤电导率(EC)、pH值、土壤有机碳(SOC)、全氮(TN)、碱解氮(AN)、全钾(TK)、速效钾(AK)、全磷(TP)、速效磷(AP)、球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白(TG和EEG))的基础上,分别从其相关关系及受造林与否(农田和杨树防护林)和造林树种(针叶林和阔叶林)的影响进行研究,得出以下结论:(1)物理性质与其余指标相关关系方面:土壤比表面积、容重和孔隙度3个孔隙指标与其它指标显著相关个数及相关系数R2显示,土壤容重与土壤肥力及理化性质变化相关性最高。不同物理指标对于表征土壤肥力的功能存在差异性:土壤的比表面积与土壤含水量的相关性最强(R2=0.24, slope=0.085),表明土壤比表面积越大,土壤持水能力越强:土壤容重与土壤SOC含量相关程度最强(R2=0.21, slope=-24.92),而土壤的孔隙度与TN含量的相关程度最高(R2=0.08,slope=0.02)。3个指标与养分的不同形式的相关性分析结果显示:它们多与全量养分(TN、TK.TP)相关性较高(R2=0.058),而与养分速效量(AN.AK和AP)相关性较弱(R2=0.026)。(2)受造林与否影响方面:30余年的杨树造林在lm土壤剖面能够显著增加土壤孔隙度(1.89%)、显著降低土壤容重(60mg/cm3)和含水量(0.93%),伴有增加土壤K和降低P的趋势,但土壤N, TG, EEG和SOC没有明显的变化。土壤孔隙相关指标的提升与球囊霉素和SOC在土壤物理结构调节效能方面的提升是相关连的,并且杨树林的线性斜率,R2值分别是农田的1.2-2.8倍和1.6-2.4倍。养分的变化在不同地点和土层之间是存在显著交互作用的。同各地点农田相比杨树防护林消耗更多的水,并且土壤比表面积与土壤含水量密切相关。我们的研究结果对于从土壤改进的角度对农田造林实践的评估和管理提供支撑。(3)受造林树种影响方面:较针叶林而言,阔叶林在0-60cm土层内显著增加土壤含水量21.4%,孔隙度95%,SOC 2.2g/kg, AN 9.5mg/kg, TN 0.1g/kg, AP 1.4mg/kg, TP 0.05g/kg,显著降低了土壤容重2.7%。此外,通过针、阔叶林间土壤理化性质与土壤肥力相关指标的关系的差异分析得知,叶片类型的差异能够显著影响土壤含水量与SOC及土壤pH与土壤磷(TP、AP)的相关关系,其中土壤含水量的变化对针叶林SOC影响更大,而土壤pH的变化对阔叶林磷的影响更大。并且土壤理化指标的变化对土壤TN的影响更为显著,尤其土壤容重的变化(R2=0.68)。我们的研究将为中国东北地区的土壤退化及其评估提供一定的数据支撑。
[Abstract]:Long-term unreasonable exploitation led to the decline of soil fertility in Northeast China, which was accompanied by the deterioration of soil physical properties. But there are few studies on the importance of physical properties and the possibility of afforestation restoration. Therefore, this study takes the soil of Northeast China as the research object, and measures different physical properties (soil porosity, specific gravity, bulk density, specific surface area). Soil water content, maximum moisture absorption) and other physical, chemical and fertility indexes (soil electrical conductivity, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TNN), alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen (ANN)). Total potassium (TK), available potassium (AK), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (APP), balloon mycin related soil proteins (TG and EEGG). The effects of afforestation (farmland and poplar shelterbelt) and afforestation species (coniferous forest and broad-leaved forest) were studied. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) physical properties are related to the other indexes: soil specific surface area, bulk density and porosity are significantly related to the other indexes, and the correlation coefficient R2 shows. Soil bulk density had the highest correlation with soil fertility and physical and chemical properties. There were differences in the function of soil fertility with different physical indexes. The correlation between soil specific surface area and soil water content was the strongest (P < 0.05). R2P 0.24. Slope0. 085, indicating that the larger the specific surface area of soil, the stronger the water holding capacity of soil. The correlation between soil bulk density and soil SOC content is the strongest (R2 + 0. 21). The correlation between soil porosity and TN content is the highest (R20.08). The results of correlation analysis of three indexes and nutrient were as follows: most of them had high correlation with total nutrient (TNT K. TPV) (R2N 0.058). However, the correlation with available nutrient amount (AN.AK and APP) is weaker than that with R2C0.026, AK and AP2). The poplar afforestation for more than 30 years under the influence of afforestation or not can significantly increase the soil porosity in the soil profile (Lm). Decreased soil bulk density (60mg / cm ~ (3)) and water content (0.93%), accompanied by increasing soil K and decreasing P, but soil N, TG. There was no significant change in EEG and SOC. The improvement of soil porosity related indexes was related to the improvement of soil physical structure regulation efficiency by balloon mycin and SOC and the linear slope of poplar forest. R2 values were 1.2-2.8 times and 1.6-2.4 times of farmland, respectively. There was significant interaction between different sites and soil layers in nutrient changes. Compared with the farmland in different locations, poplar shelterbelts consumed more. Water. And the soil specific surface area is closely related to the soil moisture content. Our results provide support for the evaluation and management of afforestation practices in farmland from the perspective of soil improvement. Affected by afforestation tree species: more than coniferous forest. Broad-leaved forest significantly increased soil water content in 0-60cm soil layer by 21.4m, porosity 95 / kg SOC 2.2 g / kg, an 9.5 mg / kg. TN 0.1 g / kg AP 1.4 mg / kg TP 0.05 g / kg significantly decreased soil bulk weight 2.7%. The analysis of the relationship between soil physical and chemical properties and soil fertility among broad-leaved forest showed that the difference of leaf type could significantly affect soil water content and SOC, soil pH and soil phosphorus. Among them, the change of soil water content has more influence on SOC of coniferous forest. The change of soil pH had more influence on phosphorus in broad-leaved forest, and the change of soil physical and chemical index had more significant effect on soil TN. In particular, the variation of soil bulk density is 0.68. Our study will provide some data support for soil degradation and assessment in Northeast China.
【学位授予单位】:东北林业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:S714

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 田佳秋,兰伟,李树森,赵晶明;整地深度对土壤物理性质的影响[J];防护林科技;2005年03期

2 J.A.GENT;关继义;刘谦和;;采运作业和整地对森林土壤物理性质的影响[J];国外林业;1987年03期

3 郑存德;程岩;张明明;;质地对土壤物理性质的影响及调节研究[J];干旱区资源与环境;2014年04期

4 张冬青;何腾兵;林昌虎;何佳芳;;贵州乌江流域喀斯特土壤物理性质的研究[J];贵州科学;2006年02期

5 黎建强;张洪江;程金花;王幸;吕文星;;长江上游不同植物篱系统的土壤物理性质[J];应用生态学报;2011年02期

6 李梅;杨万勤;肖艳;吴福忠;;干扰对毕棚沟生态旅游区土壤物理性质的影响[J];中国农学通报;2010年14期

7 唐淑英,杨兴邦,谭军,陈东民;光明畜牧场土壤物理性质及其改良途径[J];土壤;1986年02期

8 张飞;陈云明;王耀凤;王琳琳;;黄土丘陵半干旱区柠条林对土壤物理性质及有机质的影响[J];水土保持研究;2010年03期

9 W·L.Pritchett;李佩忠;吴利华;;燃烧对森林土壤物理性质的影响[J];国外林业;1990年02期

10 王洪斌;森林火灾对土壤物理性质的影响[J];林业科技情报;2002年03期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 张鲁;周跃;许树克;;西南纵向岭谷区坡地土壤物理性质特征研究[A];中国环境科学学会2009年学术年会论文集(第二卷)[C];2009年

2 黄毅;张玉龙;;秸秆集中深还对土壤物理性质和玉米产量的影响[A];面向未来的土壤科学(上册)——中国土壤学会第十二次全国会员代表大会暨第九届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2012年

3 侯悦龙;陈学勋;常伟东;;敖汉旗人工林地土壤物理性质分析[A];科技创新与经济结构调整——第七届内蒙古自治区自然科学学术年会优秀论文集[C];2012年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 王立;黄土丘陵沟壑区保护性耕作条件下土壤物理性质及水土流失研究[D];甘肃农业大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 裴忠雪;东北典型垦区土壤物理性质与肥力关系及其对造林的响应[D];东北林业大学;2016年

2 路嘉丽;基于树种影响土壤差异的造林树种选择初步研究[D];东北林业大学;2016年

3 伍海兵;城市绿地土壤物理性质特征及其改良研究[D];南京农业大学;2013年

4 韩永俊;稻草整株还田对土壤物理性质的影响[D];东北农业大学;2003年

5 李海明;基于土壤物理性质的垃圾填埋场覆土厚度研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2014年

6 吴迪;土壤物理性质的化学调控技术及其对作物产量的影响[D];内蒙古农业大学;2011年

7 杜阿朋;六盘山叠叠沟小流域土壤物理性质及其水文功能研究[D];河北农业大学;2006年

8 蓝明菊;富营养化污水灌溉对土壤物理性质的影响研究[D];石河子大学;2010年

9 焦彩强;集约化生产模式下耕作对土壤物理性质的影响及效应分析[D];西北农林科技大学;2008年

10 徐爱珍;上阔下竹复合经营模式对林地土壤物理性质与有机碳的影响[D];南京林业大学;2012年



本文编号:1386292

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/1386292.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户df0c3***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com