覆盖材料和沟垄比对土壤水分和紫花苜蓿干草产量的影响
本文选题:垄沟集雨 切入点:紫花苜蓿 出处:《生态学报》2017年03期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:为寻求半干旱黄土高原区种植紫花苜蓿的适宜覆盖材料和最佳沟垄比,采用完全随机设计布置大田试验,以传统平作为对照,研究不同垄覆盖材料(土壤结皮、生物可降解地膜和普通地膜)和不同沟垄比(沟宽:垄宽分别为60∶30、60∶45和60∶60,单位是cm)对土壤水分和紫花苜蓿干草产量等的影响。结果表明:通过对2012年和2013年紫花苜蓿生育期降雨量统计,2a平均值显示,无效降雨次数(53次)大于有效降雨次数(27次),无效降雨对总降雨量的贡献率(19%)小于有效降雨(81%)。就紫花苜蓿全生育期而言,与平作相比,SR_(30)、SR_(45)、SR_(60)、BMR_(30)、BMR_(45)、BMR_(60)、CMR_(30)、CMR_(45)和CMR_(60)(SR、BMR和CMR分别代表土垄、生物可降解膜垄和普通膜垄,下标分别表示垄宽为30、45cm和60cm)连续2a的平均根层(0—140 cm)土壤贮水量分别提高12.8、19.2、24.4、26.0、30.7、40.5、29.9、37.1 mm和47.7 mm。垄沟集雨种植第1年龄和第2年龄紫花苜蓿根层没有出现明显干层。与平作相比,SR_(30)、SR_(45)和SR_(60)的连续2a紫花苜蓿平均实际干草产量分别降低3%、8%和13%,WUE分别提高52%、58%和55%;BMR_(30)、BMR_(45)、BMR_(60)、CMR_(30)、CMR_(45)和CMR_(60)的连续2a紫花苜蓿平均实际干草产量分别提高14%、12%、7%、17%、19%和9%,WUE分别提高49%、62%、59%、51%、67%和56%。当紫花苜蓿生育期降雨量为380.7—427.6 mm和沟垄比为60 cm∶35—36 cm时,生物可降解膜垄和普通膜垄的紫花苜蓿实际干草产量达到最大值,为该地区垄沟集雨种植紫花苜蓿提供参考。
[Abstract]:In order to find the suitable mulching material and furrow ratio for alfalfa planting in semi-arid loess plateau, the field experiment was conducted with complete random design, and the different ridge mulching materials (soil crust) were studied with traditional level as control. The effects of biodegradable mulching film and common mulching film on soil moisture and yield of alfalfa hay were studied in different furrow / ridge ratio (furrow width: furrow width: 60: 30: 60: 45 and 60: 60 in cm). The results showed that the soil moisture and the yield of alfalfa hay were increased in 2012 and 2013. The mean value of precipitation in alfalfa growth period was 2a. For the whole growth period of alfalfa, compared to the total growth period of alfalfa, the number of cases of ineffective rainfall is greater than that of effective rainfall (27 times) and the contribution rate of invalid rainfall to total rainfall is 19). For the whole growth period of alfalfa, compared with plain work, compared with plain work, the number of cases of ineffective rainfall is higher than that of the number of effective rainfall. Biodegradable film ridges and ordinary film ridges, The soil water storage was increased by 12.819. 2 ~ 24. 4 ~ 26. 0 ~ 30. 7 ~ 30. 7 ~ 29. 9 ~ 37. 1 mm and 47. 7 mm respectively. There was no obvious dry layer in the root layer of alfalfa at the first and second ages of the ridge catchment and the second age, respectively. There was no obvious dry layer in the root layer of alfalfa in the first and second ages of the ridge catchment cultivation, and the soil water storage was increased by 12. 819. 2% and 30. 7% respectively. The results showed that there was no obvious dry layer in the root layer of alfalfa. The average actual hay production of alfalfa for 2 years is reduced by 3 8% and 13WUE, respectively, by 52 58% and 5 55%, respectively, and the number of BMRs is increased by 52 58% and 55 5% respectively.) the average actual actual hay production of alfalfa for 2 years has increased by 1 412 717 19% and 9 WUE by 4 962 5959 567% and 56. 67%, respectively, in both the continuous 2a alfalfa average actual hay production and the continuous 2 year alfalfa average actual hay production. When the rainfall was 380.7-427.6 mm and the ratio of furrow and ridge was 60 cm:35-36 cm, The actual yield of alfalfa with biodegradable film ridges and common film ridges reached the maximum, which provided a reference for planting alfalfa with rain-harvesting in this area.
【作者单位】: 甘肃农业大学草业学院;甘肃农业大学农学院;中国气象局兰州干旱气象研究所/甘肃省气候变化与减灾重点实验室;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41461062,41161090)
【分类号】:S152.7;S541.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 白玉龙,姜永,乌艳虹,韩晓华,陶红梅;两种豆科牧草干草产量正交试验[J];内蒙古草业;2004年01期
2 刘淑新;朱若蝉;;收获与调制过程对干草品质的影响[J];现代畜牧兽医;2011年06期
3 武路广;霍梅俊;刘思奇;张亚茹;马婷婷;王欣;张毅;董宽虎;;白羊草干草产量与主要农艺性状的多元回归及通径分析[J];草地学报;2013年04期
4 B.S.Baker;徐崇敬;;用盘状测定器测定混合草层的干草产量[J];国外畜牧学.草原;1982年05期
5 王钦;影响干草质量的主要因素及其质量标准的评定方法[J];中国草地;1996年03期
6 高占魁;刘景辉;朱建国;段宇坤;焦立新;;氮和磷对健宝产鲜干草产量效应分析[J];耕作与栽培;2008年03期
7 诗志信;;国外干草生产概况[J];国外畜牧学.草原与牧草;1983年05期
8 董召荣;李焰焰;朱玉国;陈程;宋贺;李晓玲;;前茬施氮对皖草2号草产量影响的研究[J];草业科学;2007年06期
9 董宽虎;张瑞忠;李连友;王海;崔志文;孔宪石;;不同耕作方式对麦茬复种饲草干草产量的影响[J];中国草地学报;2010年02期
10 李志强;;燕麦干草质量评价[J];中国奶牛;2013年19期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 胡跃高;程霞;;科学管理 减少干草损失[A];首届中国苜蓿发展大会论文集[C];2001年
2 陈柔屹;任勇;唐祈林;荣廷昭;;施氮量及刈割间隔时间对玉草1号的影响[A];农区草业论坛论文集[C];2008年
3 杜文华;陆娟;段雪梅;刘晓玲;;氮磷肥对红三叶中异黄酮产量的影响[A];中国草学会饲料生产委员会第15次饲草生产学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 云南省草山饲料工作站 杨仕林;云南农田种草草种的选择[N];云南科技报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张志华;雁门关区不同品种紫花苜蓿产量和营养价值比较分析[D];山西农业大学;2015年
2 孟元发;鄂尔多斯地区紫花苜蓿生产性能及生理特性研究[D];中国农业科学院;2015年
3 董晓兵;人工羊草地生产力及水肥利用效率研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
4 宋兴阳;集雨垄径流特征和垄沟集雨对紫花苜蓿生产效应的影响[D];甘肃农业大学;2016年
5 伊霞;微肥配施对紫花苜蓿干草产量及营养品质的影响研究[D];河北农业大学;2009年
,本文编号:1606863
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/1606863.html