不同规模养殖户畜禽污染治理政策接受意愿分析——基于选择试验方法

发布时间：2018-04-04 02:26

本文选题：畜禽污染　切入点：治理政策　出处：《中国农业大学学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：为了解不同规模养殖户对畜禽污染治理政策的接受意愿,基于全国5省754个生猪养殖户的实地调查数据,运用选择试验方法实证检验了不同规模养殖户对技术培训、排污费、技术标准、沼气补贴和粪肥交易市场5项畜禽污染治理政策的接受意愿。研究结果表明,不同规模养殖户对畜禽污染治理政策的接受意愿具有异质性。小规模养殖户对沼气补贴政策的接受意愿最高,其次为全面技术培训和一般技术培训政策,对技术标准政策的接受意愿最低;中规模养殖户对沼气补贴政策的接受意愿最高,其次为粪肥交易市场和全面技术培训政策,对排污费政策的接受意愿最低;大规模养殖户对粪肥交易市场政策的接受意愿最高,其次为沼气补贴和技术标准政策,对一般技术培训政策的接受意愿最低。畜禽污染治理政策对不同规模养殖户的激励程度不同。中规模养殖户在各项政策下畜禽污染处理率的提高比例均较高,小规模养殖户在各项政策下畜禽污染处理率的提高比例均较低。
[Abstract]:In order to understand the willingness of different scale breeders to accept the policy of livestock and poultry pollution control, based on the field investigation data of 754 pig farmers in 5 provinces of China, the selection test method was used to empirically test the technical training and sewage charges of different scale breeders.Technical standards, biogas subsidies and manure trading market 5 livestock and poultry pollution control policy acceptance will.The results show that the willingness of livestock and poultry pollution control policy is heterogeneity among farmers of different scale.Small-scale farmers had the highest willingness to accept the biogas subsidy policy, followed by comprehensive technical training and general technical training policy, and the lowest willingness to accept the technical standard policy, while medium-scale farmers had the highest willingness to accept the biogas subsidy policy.The second is the manure trading market and the comprehensive technical training policy, with the lowest willingness to accept the sewage fee policy; the large-scale farmers have the highest willingness to accept the manure trading market policy, followed by the biogas subsidy and technical standard policy.Minimum willingness to accept general technical training policy.Livestock and poultry pollution control policy on different scale farmers different incentives.The proportion of the treatment rate of livestock and poultry pollution was higher in the middle scale farmers than in the small scale farmers under the policies.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学鄱阳湖生态经济研究院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金资助项目(71303099,71673123) 江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(JJ1510) 江西省教育科学“十二五”规划研究项目(一般30) 江西省普通高校科技落地计划科学前沿项目(KJLD12065) 江西省自然科学基金重大项目(20152ACB20004)
【分类号】：X713

【相似文献】