上备田河小流域不同林分类型固土保水能力
本文选题:固土保水 + 林分类型 ; 参考:《江西农业大学学报》2017年03期
【摘要】:以江西上犹县上备田河小流域连续8年的监测数据为基础,分析比较针阔混交林、湿地松林、杉木林、马尾松林和宜林荒山荒地(对照)5种不同林分类型的固土保水能力及其与降雨量、降雨强度、径流量和含沙量等因子的关系。结果表明:(1)各类型的径流量与土壤侵蚀量均呈逐年下降趋势,其针阔混交林年平均下降率最大,分别为7.4%和22.5%,变化最小的均为宜林荒山荒地。(2)年均径流量与年均土壤侵蚀量均表现为宜林荒山荒地马尾松林杉木林湿地松林针阔混交林;针阔混交林与宜林荒山荒地的径流量差异显著(P0.05);针阔混交林、湿地松林、杉木林、马尾松林与宜林荒山荒地的土壤侵蚀量均存在显著性差异(P0.05),针阔混交林与湿地松林、杉木林、马尾松林的土壤侵蚀量差异显著(P0.05)。(3)不同类型的土壤侵蚀量与降雨量、降雨强度均呈显著或极显著相关,降雨量、降雨强度对宜林荒山荒地土壤侵蚀量的影响程度最大,对针阔混交林的影响最小。
[Abstract]:Based on the monitoring data of Shangbei River small watershed in Shangyou County, Jiangxi Province for 8 consecutive years, this paper analyzed and compared the coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, Pinus elliottii forest and Chinese fir forest. The soil retention capacity of five different stand types in Pinus massoniana forest and barren mountain wasteland in Yilin and its relationship with rainfall intensity runoff and sediment content were studied. The results showed that the runoff and soil erosion showed a decreasing trend year by year, and the annual average decline rate of coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest was the highest. The average annual runoff and soil erosion amount were respectively 7.4% and 22.5%, respectively, and the smallest change was in the barren mountain wasteland of Yilin. 2) the annual runoff and the average annual soil erosion amount were both coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests of Pinus massoniana and Pinus massoniana. There were significant differences in soil erosion between coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest and barren mountain wasteland in Yilin, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, Pinus elliottii forest, Chinese fir forest, Pinus massoniana forest and barren mountain wasteland in Yilin forest, there were significant differences in soil erosion between coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest and Pinus elliottii forest, Chinese fir forest, coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest, Pinus elliottii forest and Chinese fir forest. The soil erosion amount of Pinus massoniana forest was significantly different (P0.05N. 3) different types of soil erosion amount and rainfall intensity were significant or extremely significant correlation, rainfall, rainfall intensity has the greatest impact on the amount of soil erosion in barren mountains and wasteland in Yilin. The effect on coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest was the least.
【作者单位】: 江西农业大学林学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(31360181、30860229) 江西省林业科技创新专项资金项目(201607)~~
【分类号】:S714.7
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张璇;殷有;刘明国;赵伟浩;吴栋栋;;朝阳地区不同林分类型对土壤养分元素的影响[J];中国高新技术企业;2008年09期
2 吕瑞恒;刘勇;于海群;李国雷;刘辉;王玉江;;北京山区不同林分类型土壤肥力的研究[J];北京林业大学学报;2009年06期
3 吕明亮;陈养飞;方佐昭;何风根;;柯城区不同林分类型生态公益林土壤理化性质初步研究[J];浙江林业科技;2010年02期
4 周国娜;袁胜亮;张丽丽;;不同林分类型下的土壤节肢动物群落的组成与分布[J];山东农业大学学报(自然科学版);2013年01期
5 王承建;盛振兴;;济南市南部山区不同林分类型土壤入渗规律的研究[J];山东林业科技;2007年05期
6 向仕敏;陆梅;徐柳斌;张仕艳;左智天;蒋翠芬;;5种林分类型林地土壤氮含量与其土壤微生物学性质的研究[J];西部林业科学;2008年01期
7 黄进;杨会;张金池;;桐庐生态公益林主要林分类型的土壤水文效应[J];生态环境学报;2009年03期
8 丛日亮;张金池;黄进;王如岩;王荣娟;陈莉莎;;苏南丘陵区主要林分类型土壤水文效应[J];亚热带水土保持;2010年04期
9 胡建朋;杨吉华;罗明达;李星辰;;山东石灰岩山地不同林分类型土壤入渗特征研究[J];水土保持学报;2011年03期
10 刘霞,王丽,张光灿,刘信儒,梁华;鲁中石质山地不同林分类型土壤结构特征[J];水土保持学报;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 史玉虎;肖文发;潘磊;王鹏程;黄志霖;王珠娜;;三峡库区典型小流域主要林分类型土壤渗透性能[A];森林可持续经营与生态文明学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 朱丽s,
本文编号:1956456
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/1956456.html