中国传统农业与有机农业关系之哲学辨析

发布时间：2018-06-03 03:59

本文选题：中国传统农业 + 有机农业　；参考：《南京农业大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文就传统农业与有机农业的关系为研究对象,主要从哲学思辨的角度对两者的关系进行详尽的分析,以规范的研究方法为主要的研究手段,从自然观、技术观、价值观和社会实践观对两种农业形式进行了深刻的比对。基于对文献的整体和思考,对相关概念进行了界定,对传统农业相关的历史发展、内涵、外延作出了一个简要的勾勒,并与有机农业的相关概念、特点、原则等进行对比,发现两者在农业行为的起始点和发展路径上存在着诸多相似与渊源,但是同时又各自具有不同的侧重点,不同的特质,并就从传统农业到有机农业的发展脉络进行了逻辑推演。本文认为中国传统与有机农业在自然观哲学部分,均带有自然整体论的哲学特质,但是分歧之处则是对于整体论认识的不均衡而产生的,这方面的原因可以被归纳为历史的、文化的等多种因素,传统农业以"天人合一"为起点,构建了一套卓有成效和哲学意味的农业体系,具有被动的、自发的、模糊的原始性特质,有机农业的整体自然观则较多的来源于时代的因素,是人类对于认识不断深化的结果,是主动的人类自律精神的觉醒。承接两者在自然整体论方面的差异,本文继续对两者的技术观异同进行挖掘,重点指出了两种农业形式在技术层面均具有尊重生命、尊重自然的特征,并充分认识到传统农业与有机农业在利用物质循环方面的优势之外,也看到了基于循环、尊重自然、生命的程度的不同和侧重点的差异,主动服从与被动应用的差异,最后联系到技术异化的现象等内容进行详细的分析。本文还以两者的价值观变迁为脉络,分析了从传统农业到有机农业发展过程中,关于人类对自然的价值发生了不同的变化,有着明显的转向的思想痕迹,关于自然价值的重申,文章进行了仔细的界定,即并非是对于神秘主义的提倡,也不是妄图建立"拜自然教",而试图打破科学理性独尊的格局,意图通过分析传统农业中的精神力量的回归,以强调推行有机农业所具有的价值意义。此外,本文还就现代有机农业的社会实践与中国传统农业的实践行为进行了对照,在看到时代背景的差异的前提下,分析了农业与其相关的组织模式之间的关系,尝试探讨现代有机农业所具有的社群修复功能、社会信用机制重建,以此与传统农业社群关系的形成呼应,探讨了从传统农业中作为出发点的"情"与有机农业中作为目标的"情"转变的实现路径,以完成两种农业形式在社会观层面上具有的契合性关系的论证。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the relationship between traditional agriculture and organic agriculture is studied, the relationship between them is analyzed in detail from the angle of philosophical thinking, and the normative research method is taken as the main research means, and the view of nature and technology is taken as the main research method. The values and social practice view have carried on the profound comparison to the two kinds of agricultural forms. Based on the whole and thinking of the literature, this paper defines the related concepts, gives a brief outline of the historical development, connotation and extension of traditional agriculture, and compares them with the related concepts, characteristics and principles of organic agriculture. It is found that there are many similarities and origins in the starting point and development path of agricultural behavior, but at the same time, they each have different emphases and characteristics, and the development context from traditional agriculture to organic agriculture is logically deduced. This paper holds that both Chinese tradition and organic agriculture have the philosophical characteristics of natural holism in the philosophical part of natural view, but the differences arise from the imbalance of the understanding of holism, which can be summed up as historical. Cultural factors and other factors, the traditional agriculture with the "unity of nature and man" as the starting point, constructed a set of fruitful and philosophical agricultural system, with passive, spontaneous, fuzzy primitive characteristics, The whole view of nature of organic agriculture comes from the factor of the times, which is the result of the deepening of human cognition and the awakening of the self-discipline spirit of human being. Based on the differences between the two in the theory of natural holism, this paper continues to dig out the similarities and differences between the two views of technology, and points out that the two forms of agriculture have the characteristics of respecting life and nature at the technical level. And fully aware of the advantages of traditional agriculture and organic agriculture in the use of material cycles, as well as the differences in the degree and focus of life based on recycling, respect for nature, and active and passive application, Finally, related to the phenomenon of technology alienation and other content for detailed analysis. This paper also analyzes the different changes in the value of human beings to nature in the process of development from traditional agriculture to organic agriculture in the context of the changes in the values of the two, and the obvious changes in the thinking traces, and the reaffirmation of the value of nature. The article has made a careful definition, that is, not advocating mysticism, nor attempting to establish "worship of nature", but trying to break the pattern of scientific rationality, with the intention of analyzing the return of spiritual power in traditional agriculture. In order to emphasize the value meaning of carrying out organic agriculture. In addition, this paper compares the social practice of modern organic agriculture with the practice behavior of Chinese traditional agriculture, and analyzes the relationship between agriculture and its related organization mode on the premise of different background of the times. This paper attempts to explore the social repair function of modern organic agriculture and the reconstruction of social credit mechanism, so that the relationship between modern organic agriculture and traditional agricultural communities can be formed and echoed. This paper discusses the way to realize the transformation of "emotion" in traditional agriculture and "emotion" in organic agriculture, so as to demonstrate the compatibility between the two forms of agriculture on the level of social view.
【学位授予单位】：南京农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：S-02

【相似文献】