不同马尾松群落类型的年凋落变化及松针分解过程研究
[Abstract]:Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) is the main afforestation tree species in the south of China. It has a wide distribution, strong adaptability and fast growth. It has a very important position in the forestry construction. Through the study of the annual litter change and pine needle decomposition process of different types of Masson pine community, it can better understand the nutrient cycling process of the ecological system of the Pinus massoniana forest ecosystem. A long-term fixed-point monitoring method was used to study the annual litter change and pine needle decomposition process of three different densities of Pinus massoniana plantation, the pine needles decomposition process of three different community types and the pine needles under the condition of multi factor regulation. The litter collection net and litter decomposition bag were arranged in the pure forest of Pinus massoniana in different stand density. The litter was collected continuously for one year and the seasonal variation of litter volume was analyzed. The litter decomposition bag was continuously recovered for 18 months, and the dry weight and nutrient content of the litter were analyzed. The litter decomposition bag was collected for one year, and the changes of dry weight and nutrient content were analyzed. The decomposition of pine needles was regulated by 4 factor 3 level orthogonal test, and the change of decomposition rate was analyzed. The litter volume and nutrient content were analyzed with Excel and SPSS data processing software. The results showed: (1) middle density forest year The litter size was the largest, about 4.51t/hm2, obviously greater than low, high density stand, significant difference (P0.05), and there was no significant difference between the low density stand and the high density stand. There was a significant difference between the low density stand and the high density stand, and the litterfall was the largest in the fall, and the pine needles accounted for the largest proportion of the litter in the litter, and the nutrient concentration in the pine needles had a distinct season. The difference between the maximum and the minimum seasons was significant (P0.05). The changes in the annual return of nutrients in different densities were the same as that of the annual litter, which were the largest, low, high density and little difference, and there were obvious seasonal variations of the nutrient return, which were the largest in autumn, in summer and in the two quarter of winter and spring. The difference between the maximum and the minimum seasons was significant (P0.05). (2) the decomposition of pine needles in the artificial pure forest of Pinus massoniana was very slow, which was different from those of previous studies, because the decomposition bag cleared the surface litter and the semi decomposition layer, cut off the relationship between the pine needles and the microbes, soil microbes and pine needles. The decomposition rate of pine needles increased rapidly after a period of decomposition, and the decomposition rate of pine needles in the two quarter of summer and autumn was faster. After 18 months of decomposition, the weight loss rates of pine needles were 40.15%, 47.85% and 43.5%, respectively, and the decomposition rate and decomposition period of pine needles in Pinus massoniana plantation were all changed with the change of density, 3 The decomposition rate of pine needles in the density stand is 0.342,0.434,0.381, the difference between 22 and the medium density (No. 6 forest) is the fastest. It shows that the increase of the density of Pinus massoniana plantation can accelerate the decomposition of the litter, but it will restrict the decomposition of the litter in a certain degree, so the management of the Pinus massoniana Plantation The rational planning of the stand density can effectively accelerate the decomposition of litter and promote the nutrient cycling of the woodland. The half-life of the 3 density stand is 2.0A, 1.6A, 1.8A, respectively 8.8a, 6.9a, 7.9a, half life and turnover period. (3) the 3 types of pine needles begin to decompose the fastest. Then gradually slow down, after 1A decomposition, the 3 types of weightlessness were 45.70%, 52.50% and 48.10% respectively, the decomposition rates were 0.611,0.744 and 0.656 respectively. The difference between the 22 and the natural secondary forests of Masson pine was the fastest, followed by Pinus massoniana, Liriodendron and broad-leaved mixed forest and the slowest decomposition of Pinus massoniana plantation. The 3 types of forest species richness index were 4.12,4.34 and 3.69 respectively, which were the largest in natural secondary forests. The more species diversity was, the more rich the shrub broad-leaved trees were, the more species and quantity of soil microbes and the faster the decomposition of litter, which indicated that the appropriate replanting of shrub broad-leaved trees in the pure forest of Masson Pine people could not change when they were planted. In the case of pre operation, the nutrient cycling speed of woodland was accelerated and the productivity of Pinus massoniana woodland was increased. The half-life of 3 types of pine needles was 1.1a, 0.9A, 1.1a respectively, and the turnover period was 4.9a, 4.0a, 4.6a, respectively. (4) in the process of pine needles, the contents of each element were constantly changing, but two kinds of different kinds were not. The release dynamics of nutrient elements in the same level of pine needle decomposition test were similar, C showed direct release mode, K, Ca, Mg and other elements showed leaching release mode, N, P, Mn, Cu and other elements showed enrichment release mode; Fe, Zn slightly different, the concentration release mode was shown in different density tests, and the different types of experiments were leaching rich. The set release mode is related to the difference in the time and the composition of the stand, the arrangement of the test time is different, the temperature and the rainfall are different, which lead to the difference in the dynamics of the element release and the difference in the composition of the stand, which will lead to the difference of the microorganism structure and the difference of the rule of the element release. (5) among the 4 factors, the microbial factor and the organic matter It can significantly affect the decomposition of pine needles, and the influence of surfactant and C/N is not significant. Therefore, bacteria and organic substances are the main factors affecting the decomposition of pine needles, while surface active agents and C/N are secondary factors. Through the selection of the optimal levels of each factor, A3D2 B1C3 is inoculated with decomposing agent 2 (compound bacteria), chicken manure is added, and surfactants are not treated with surfactants. Spraying glucose - NH4Cl mixed solution is the best combination to control pine needles decomposition.
【学位授予单位】:贵州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S714
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卢善土;闽北马尾松资源现状及发展设想[J];林业经济问题;1990年02期
2 方兴家;马尾松施肥增产增效[J];安徽林业;1996年01期
3 李歌发,邓名家;浅议发展马尾松[J];湖南林业;1997年01期
4 张秀华;;马尾松、固氮树种混交造林探讨[J];林业勘察设计;2000年01期
5 谢锦升,陈光水,何宗明,杨玉盛,吴大同;退化红壤不同治理模式马尾松生长特点分析[J];水土保持通报;2001年06期
6 陈虞禄,黄立军,韩其飞,张朝旺;韶关地区良种马尾松与湿加松幼龄生长调查[J];热带林业;2004年02期
7 江海涛;盛宗保;程建国;宋宏林;;马尾松根系生长与土壤的关系[J];安徽林业科技;2004年03期
8 周长海;皖东马尾松纯林更新改造技术研究[J];安徽农业科学;2005年06期
9 范建华;;马尾松毛红椿混交林生长效果和土壤肥力研究[J];防护林科技;2007年03期
10 朱鹤鸣;;马尾松培育技术的研究初报[J];安徽农学通报;2008年01期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 黄传伟;;沿海丘陵马尾松马占相思混交林生产力和改土效果研究[A];中国水土保持探索与实践——小流域可持续发展研讨会论文集[C];2005年
2 黄光霖;周志春;;马尾松纸浆林培育中存在的问题和其对策[A];中国造纸学会第九届学术年会论文集[C];1999年
3 李午平;伍家荣;李冬;;马尾松生长性状的早晚期相关与早期预测[A];林木遗传改良讨论会文集(杉木、马尾松等树种)[C];1991年
4 林德喜;胡锋;;马尾松林套种不同阔叶树土壤肥力性质的分异研究[A];中国地壤学会第十次全国会员代表大会暨第五届海峡两岸土壤肥料学术交流研讨会文集(面向农业与环境的土壤科学专题篇)[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 记者 宋克顺邋通讯员 汪文正;一场“黄雨”洒下的生态喜忧[N];湖北日报;2008年
2 张昌祯 记者 刘水莲;托起绿色的希望[N];赣南日报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 李志勇;酸沉降条件下的重庆铁山坪森林健康监测及调控技术研究[D];中国林业科学研究院;2006年
2 张令峰;不同混交比例马尾松林生态功能比较研究[D];安徽农业大学;2013年
3 罗达;南亚热带格木、马尾松幼龄纯林及其混交林碳氮特征研究[D];中国林业科学研究院;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 昝玉亭;马尾松、湿地松人工林结构对森林水文功能的影响[D];江西农业大学;2013年
2 秦金舟;枞阳大山马尾松针阔混交林林地主要生态效应研究[D];安徽农业大学;2014年
3 林惠章;飞播马尾松混交林生物量及其空间结构研究[D];江西农业大学;2015年
4 吴明;马尾松—麻栎人工混交林种内与种间竞争关系研究[D];河南农业大学;2015年
5 邓超;马尾松纯林与混交林生态系统生物多样性与生物量研究[D];四川农业大学;2015年
6 陆德辉;不同马尾松群落类型的年凋落变化及松针分解过程研究[D];贵州大学;2015年
7 刘敏;缙云山不同类型马尾松混交林的土壤水文生态功能研究[D];北京林业大学;2011年
8 王爱萍;马尾松自身化感及其与伴生种之间的化感作用[D];福建农林大学;2004年
9 封晓辉;气候变化对中国马尾松径向生长的影响[D];中国林业科学研究院;2011年
10 林培治;福建长汀水土流失区马尾松种群动态及其机制研究[D];福建师范大学;2013年
,本文编号:2121413
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2121413.html