罕台川流域上游水土保持措施减水减沙效益研究
[Abstract]:The upper reaches of the Hantaichuan Basin belong to the second sub-region of the Loess Hilly and Gully region, and its soil and water conservation management is typical. This paper takes the upper reaches of the Hantaichuan Basin as the study area, and fully understands the present situation of land use in the upper reaches of the basin. Based on the present situation of soil and water conservation and the characteristics of river basin water and sediment, the runoff depth and erosion modulus of different land use types are determined by setting up standard runoff plot test observation, based on the water storage capacity of typical silt dam. Based on the study of sediment retention and service life, the benefits of water and sediment reduction of soil and water conservation measures in the upper reaches of Hantaichuan River Basin in 1998 and 2013 were calculated by using "soil and Water Conservation method". At the same time, the water and sediment reduction benefits of soil and water conservation measures in the upper reaches of Hantai River Basin from 1990 to 1999 are calculated by using "hydrological method", and the results of water and sediment reduction benefits of "hydrological method" and "soil and water conservation method" are compared and analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the annual rainfall in Hantaichuan Basin varies greatly, and more than 70% of the annual rainfall in the year is seasonal rainfall. The runoff sediment content is high, the runoff and sediment transport amount are greatly different from one year to another, and the recent decrease is obvious. The distribution of runoff and sediment transport is uneven in the year. (2) the runoff depth of different land use types on the slope in 2013 and the change trend of erosion modulus are the same, which are as follows: barren land closure, recommended economic forest, tree forest, shrub forest and shrub mixed forest, and the runoff depth of the wasteland, The erosion modulus is the largest, 10.7mm and 8279t/km2 a, respectively. The runoff depth and erosion modulus of Arbor and Irrigation mixed forest are the smallest, which are respectively 4.5mmm and 2696t/km2 A. (3) the service life of the backbone dam built from 1980 to 1989 is 26 years. The service life of the backbone dam, which was built from 1990 to 1999 and 10 years from 2000 to 2009, is 30 years longer than the designed silting life. The service life of the medium-sized dam and the small dam are 34, 20 and 11 years, respectively. The service life of medium dam and core dam built after 2010 are 36 years and 22 years respectively, which are 14 years, 10 years and 6 years longer than that of design siltation, respectively, and the service life of medium dam after 2010 is 36 years and 22 years respectively. (4) based on the method of soil and water conservation, the reduction of water and soil conservation in the upper reaches of Hantaichuan basin in 1998 was 835700 m3 and 2.152 million m3, respectively, and the benefit of water reduction was 13.90% and 35.81%, respectively. The sediment reduction was 768600 t and 1.9077 million t, respectively, and the benefit of sediment reduction was 16.40% and 40.71% respectively. (5) based on the hydrological method, the water reduction of soil and water conservation in the basin of Hantaichuan from 1990 to 1999 was 1.82 million m ~ 3851 million m ~ (3), and the sediment reduction was 2.43 million m ~ (3), respectively. T, 3.64 million t, the benefits of water reduction are 13.07 and 61.09, respectively, and the benefits of sediment reduction are 60.45 and 90.55, respectively. (6) the results of calculation of water and sediment reduction benefits of soil and water conservation measures in the upper reaches of Hantai River Basin are compared and analyzed by "soil and water conservation method" and "hydrological method". The reasons for the difference between the two methods are pointed out. It is concluded that both soil and water conservation law and hydrology law should be used to confirm each other in the future research.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:S157
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏强;张秋良;代海燕;郭鑫;;大青山不同植被下的地表径流和土壤侵蚀[J];北京林业大学学报;2008年05期
2 邓慧平,李秀彬,陈军锋,张明,万洪涛;流域土地覆被变化水文效应的模拟——以长江上游源头区梭磨河为例[J];地理学报;2003年01期
3 顾新庆,,于增彦,赵海玉,艾子万,郭万喜;不同治理措施对坡面径流和泥沙量的影响[J];河北林业科技;1994年03期
4 王士永;贾国栋;段红祥;宋思铭;吴海龙;张艺;;北京山区小流域不同植被覆盖对地表径流影响研究[J];湖南农业科学;2011年19期
5 魏文俊;王兵;冷泠;;宁夏六盘山落叶森林凋落与枯落物分布及持水特性的研究[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版);2006年03期
6 斯琴;王普;王金花;;罕台川孔兑暴雨洪水产输沙特征研究[J];内蒙古水利;2014年01期
7 钟祥浩,程根伟;森林植被变化对洪水的影响分析——以长江上游典型小流域和洪水事件为例[J];山地学报;2001年05期
8 唐政洪,蔡强国;我国主要土壤侵蚀产沙模型研究评述[J];山地学报;2002年04期
9 何进知,李舒宝,蒋永奎,杜长辉;森林植被对流域产汇流的影响分析[J];水力发电学报;2001年02期
10 王礼先,张志强;森林植被变化的水文生态效应研究进展[J];世界林业研究;1998年06期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 方怒放;小流域降雨—径流—产沙关系及水土保持措施响应[D];华中农业大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 叶俊道;黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域土地利用与侵蚀产沙关系研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2011年
2 吴胜德;延河流域水保减沙效益及对水库设计的影响分析[D];西安理工大学;2003年
3 朱志丹;基于GIS的小流域水土保持减沙效益研究[D];华中农业大学;2006年
4 付凌;黄土高原典型流域淤地坝减沙减蚀作用研究[D];河海大学;2007年
5 程斯;开县芋子沟小流域水土保持效益分析与评价[D];西南大学;2009年
6 常颖;内蒙古希拉穆仁草原产流产沙试验过程研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2014年
本文编号:2135299
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2135299.html