滇南亚热带地区典型公益林与商品林凋落物储量及持水特性
[Abstract]:In order to study the hydrological and ecological effects of litterfall of public welfare forest in the subtropical region of southern Yunnan, Taking 7 typical public welfare forests of Pu'er city, A0 evergreen broadleaved forest (A0 evergreen broad-leaved forest), A _ 1 (Pinus kesiya) pure forest, A _ (2) A _ (2) A _ (2) A _ (3) Quercus mixed Quercus (2:8) A4 yellow bamboo forest, (Dendrocalamus membranceus) (A5) shrub forest, as the research object, the same type of commercial forest was studied. In addition, compared with rubber forest (Rubber plantation) and eucalyptus forest (Eucalyptus robusta), through field investigation, indoor soaking method was used to quantitatively study its litter reserves, water holding capacity, rainfall interception performance and so on. The results showed that: (1) in the public welfare forest, The litter storage of pure Pinus simaoensis forest was (21.30 卤2.10) t hm~ (-2), and that of evergreen broadleaved forest was (12.47 卤1.31) t hm~ (-2), and that of commercial forest was (14.30 卤2.41) t hm~ (-2) and (2.83 卤0.12) t hm~ (-2). (2). The water holding capacity of evergreen broadleaved forest was the largest (0.841mm), and the shrub forest was the smallest (0.449 mm); commercial forest). The moisture capacity of litter in Hevea was the largest (0.795 mm),) and the smallest (0.505 mm).) in Simao pine pure forest. The general trend was that the litter water capacity of broadleaved species was greater than that of coniferous species. There was a logarithmic relationship between the water holding capacity of litter and soaking time (Y=alnt b). (3). The rate of water absorption of the same forest and commercial forest was almost the same, except for the mixed oak, the water absorption rate of other types of public welfare forest was higher than that of the same type of commercial forest. The relationship between the water absorption rate of litter and the soaking time of different stands showed a power function relationship (YYT ~ (-b). (_ 4). The maximum water holding capacity (3.416 mm) of pure Pinus simao forest (3.416 mm) was larger than that of evergreen broadleaved forest (2.686 mm). The interception capacity of rainfall was also the best (2.033 mm); commercial forest, the most effective interception of litter (1.394mm), the largest degree of interference in rubber forest litter effective storage capacity (0.434 mm). Comprehensive analysis shows that the hydro-ecological function of litters in public welfare forest is better than that in commercial forest in the subtropical area of southern Yunnan. The integrity of litter layer is destroyed and the hydrological function of litterfall layer is weakened because of artificial management. Therefore, human disturbance is one of the main factors that affect the hydrological function of litter layer.
【作者单位】: 西南林业大学林学院;江城县勐烈镇林业服务中心;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(31660173) 西南林业大学云南省省级重点学科(林学)(2012BAD23B04) 云南省林学一流学科建设项目(51600625) 云南省教育厅重点项目(515006009) 普洱市林业局委托项目(215660)
【分类号】:S714
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李雪峰;韩士杰;胡艳玲;赵玉涛;;长白山次生针阔混交林叶凋落物中有机物分解与碳、氮和磷释放的关系[J];应用生态学报;2008年02期
2 万猛;田大伦;樊巍;;豫东平原杨-农复合系统凋落物的数量、组成及其动态[J];生态学报;2009年05期
3 马红亮;刘维丽;高人;杨玉盛;孙杰;;凋落物与单宁酸对森林土壤无机氮的影响[J];应用生态学报;2011年01期
4 彭耀强;薛立;曹鹤;任向荣;梁丽丽;;三种阔叶林凋落物的持水特性[J];水土保持学报;2006年05期
5 王清奎;汪思龙;于小军;张剑;刘燕新;;杉木与阔叶树叶凋落物混合分解对土壤活性有机质的影响[J];应用生态学报;2007年06期
6 孙志虎;牟长城;张彦东;;地统计学方法在长白落叶松人工林凋落物现存量估测中的应用[J];生物数学学报;2007年04期
7 杜春艳;曾光明;张龚;苏小康;王玲玲;黄璐;蒋益民;;韶山针阔叶混交林凋落物层的淋溶及缓冲作用[J];生态学报;2008年02期
8 覃勇荣;曾艳兰;蒋光敏;岑忠用;蓝崇钰;;不同植被恢复模式凋落物水分涵养能力比较研究——以桂西北喀斯特石漠化地区为例[J];中国农学通报;2008年10期
9 曹鹤;薛立;梁丽丽;任向荣;谢腾芳;王相娥;;3种生态公益林凋落物的持水特性[J];土壤通报;2009年01期
10 骆宗诗;向成华;慕长龙;;绵阳官司河流域主要森林类型凋落物含量及动态变化[J];生态学报;2007年05期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 吴华;张建利;喻理飞;卢红英;袁丛军;;草海流域不同森林类型枯落物水源涵养能力研究[A];第十五届中国科协年会第8分会场:环境科技创新与生态环境建设研讨会论文集[C];2013年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 梁德飞;凋落物质量、土壤动物和牛粪添加对青藏高原高寒草甸凋落物分解的影响[D];兰州大学;2016年
2 陈光升;华西雨屏区几种植被恢复模式凋落物的生态功能研究[D];四川农业大学;2008年
3 潘辉;三种相思树人工林凋落物养分归还功能及碳平衡研究[D];福建农林大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 季婧;紫金山栓皮栎林凋落物特性及其对土壤性状的作用[D];南京林业大学;2015年
2 李超;杨东山十二度水自然保护区凋落物及土壤层真菌群落动态研究[D];中国林业科学研究院;2013年
3 刘诚诚;模拟氮沉降和凋落物组成对柳杉人工林凋落物层土壤动物多样性的影响[D];四川农业大学;2014年
4 易志强;红壤退化恢复林地凋落物归还特征与土壤水源涵养功能评价[D];南昌工程学院;2017年
5 李雷达;中亚热带不同退化林地植物叶片—凋落物层—土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[D];中南林业科技大学;2017年
6 王庆玲;黔中地区几种喀斯特次生林凋落物生态功能研究[D];贵州师范大学;2009年
7 郭伟;川西亚高山植物层次调控对凋落物凋落与分解动态及苔藓的影响[D];四川农业大学;2010年
8 刘尚华;京西百花山区9种植物群落凋落物对土壤环境影响研究[D];内蒙古农业大学;2008年
9 钱正敏;茂兰喀斯特森林凋落物动态研究[D];贵州师范大学;2009年
10 严海元;缙云山马尾松林凋落物的微生物分解及养分释放特征研究[D];西南大学;2011年
,本文编号:2203964
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2203964.html