黄土高原土地利用变化对土壤侵蚀影响研究
[Abstract]:Soil erosion is one of the most important global environmental problems, and is one of the environmental effects caused by land-use change. The study of the impact of land-use change on soil erosion has become the key in the field of land-use change and soil erosion research. The loess plateau is one of the most serious soil and water loss in China and even the whole world, and with the adoption of a series of ecological measures such as the construction of the three-north protection forest system, the conversion of the farmland to the forest and the grass and the ban of the mountain, the land-use pattern of the Loess Plateau has changed significantly. Moreover, it is necessary to study the spatial and temporal differentiation of land-use change on soil erosion in the Loess Plateau. Based on the 1: 100,000 scale long-time series of land use change and the dynamic database of soil erosion, which is based on the remote sensing and digital earth research institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, the soil erosion severity index, the intensity index, the rate of change of soil erosion, etc. are comprehensively used. The temporal evolution of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau from the late 1980s to the year 2000,2000-2005 and 2005-2010 was evaluated, and the regional differences of soil erosion in the comprehensive treatment planning program of the Loess Plateau (2010-2030) were analyzed. The effect of land-use change on soil erosion is further analyzed. The results show that: (1) The loess plateau in the Loess Plateau is the most serious area of water erosion in the Loess Plateau in 2010, and the sand and desert areas are the most serious areas of the wind erosion. The severity index of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau in 2010 is 4.04, The soil erosion is the most serious in the Loess Plateau, the severity index of the soil erosion is 7.63, the wind erosion in the sand and the desert area is the most serious, the severity index of the loess high-gully region, the non-agricultural irrigation area and the soil-stone mountain area is decreased in turn, and the lowest in the valley plain area is 1.06. (2) The water erosion intensity of the Loess Plateau increased by 0.88 at the end of the 1980s to the end of the year 2000, and the intensity of the water erosion in the Loess Plateau from the end of the 1980s to the end of the year 2000 was improved, and the average intensity of the water decreased by about 1. Between the end of the 1980s and the end of 2000, The average wind erosion intensity of the loess plateau decreased by 0.39, and the average wind erosion intensity increased by 0.67 for 2000 to 2005, and the average wind erosion intensity decreased by 0.87 in 2005 to 2010. In addition, the area of increased soil erosion in each of the management zones is becoming smaller and smaller, especially after 2005, the overall erosion intensity of each zone is reduced. (3) The main land-use change way of soil erosion is different from different treatment zones on the Loess Plateau, but the dynamics of the grassland are relatively large for each zone. The grassland in the high-gully region of the loess, the plain area of the valley, the mountainous area of the soil and the non-agricultural irrigation area are mainly cultivated as cultivated land, and the grassland in the sandy land and the desert area is the main part of the unutilized land. The area and effect of returning farmland to forest in the loess hilly and gully region are the most significant. (4) The land-use change of soil erosion in the Loess Plateau was mainly based on the non-use of land and grassland in the Loess Plateau, and the land was changed to forest land after 2000. In the end of the 1980s to 2000, there existed more and more wasteland and grassland degradation as the unutilized land. During the period from 2000 to 2005, the land-use change that caused the change of soil erosion mainly has the conversion of farmland to forest, and the grassland is degraded to the unutilized land and the grassland is changed into forest land; in the period of 2005 to 2010, the soil erosion is affected by the conversion of the farmland to the forest, the grassland in the land is not used, and the urban expansion is the main. (5) In general, the soil erosion intensity between the land use types of the Loess Plateau is from light to weight to the water area, and the land, the forest land, the grassland, the cultivated land, the unused land and the soil erosion of the urban and rural industrial and mining areas are related to the change direction of the land use mode. The reduction of cultivated land can generally reduce the intensity of soil erosion, but the degradation of the cultivated land is not the use of land to increase the soil erosion, and the forest land is cultivated as the cultivated land, and the degradation of the forest land will aggravate the soil erosion. The development of the forest land as the land for urban and rural industrial and mining residents has resulted in an average erosion intensity of around 1 grade, and the degradation of the cultivated grassland and the vegetation has increased the soil erosion, and the land reclamation of the grassland is the land for the urban and rural industrial and mining residents, so that the intensity of the soil erosion is reduced by an average of 1 to 2; The decrease in water area will often result in an increase in the intensity of soil erosion, which, in contrast, has not been used to reduce the total soil erosion better.
【学位授予单位】:中国科学院大学(中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所)
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S157
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李红旮,崔伟宏;缅甸中部干旱地区土壤侵蚀的分析[J];遥感学报;2000年03期
2 刘钦普;美国土壤侵蚀治理的历史、现状和问题[J];许昌师专学报;2000年02期
3 王少军,张志;湖北省丹江口市土壤侵蚀景观形成机理[J];水土保持通报;2001年05期
4 John.W.Peterson PE;美国控制土壤侵蚀的经验[J];中国水土保持;2002年07期
5 Taro Uchida,Takahisa MiZuayma,Akitsu Kimoto ,Yuko Asano;中国东南部利用铯-137观测荒坡土壤侵蚀的局限性[J];中国水土保持;2002年07期
6 杨胜天,朱启疆,张卫国;应用智能化遥感解译方法监测贵阳市土壤侵蚀[J];中国水土保持;2002年07期
7 任兆选;美国土壤侵蚀实验室马克博士来绥考察[J];中国水土保持;2002年08期
8 ;澳大利亚对土壤侵蚀的解释[J];水土保持科技情报;2002年03期
9 ;美国对土壤侵蚀的解释[J];水土保持科技情报;2002年03期
10 ;日本的土壤侵蚀概念与法规[J];水土保持科技情报;2002年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 谢婧;吴健生;王秀茹;郑茂坤;;深圳市土地利用对土壤侵蚀的影响研究[A];中国地理学会百年庆典学术论文摘要集[C];2009年
2 何伯干;;福建晋江流域土壤侵蚀及其危害[A];第四届全国工程地质大会论文选集(一)[C];1992年
3 樊哲文;黄灵光;钱海燕;方豫;;鄱阳湖流域土壤侵蚀的空间分异规律及影响因素分析[A];第十七届中国遥感大会摘要集[C];2010年
4 蔡继清;任志勇;李迎春;;土壤侵蚀遥感快速调查中有关技术问题的商榷[A];全国第一届水土保持监测学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年
5 马为民;张剑波;田卫堂;;纹理解译标志在土壤侵蚀遥感调查中的应用[A];全国第一届水土保持监测学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年
6 卓慕宁;李定强;吴志峰;王继增;刘平;;广东省典型地区土壤侵蚀特征及防治对策[A];“全国水土流失与江河泥沙灾害及其防治对策”学术研讨会会议文摘[C];2003年
7 黄毅;张玉龙;曹忠杰;高云彪;蔡景平;;辽宁省土壤侵蚀的变化趋势及其防治对策[A];“全国水土流失与江河泥沙灾害及其防治对策”学术研讨会会议文摘[C];2003年
8 双瑞;双书东;程焕玲;;河南省不同土壤侵蚀区主要侵蚀特征及防治措施与对策[A];“全国水土流失与江河泥沙灾害及其防治对策”学术研讨会会议文摘[C];2003年
9 林敬兰;杨学震;陈明华;;基于“3S”技术的福建省土壤侵蚀动态监测研究[A];中国水利学会首届青年科技论坛论文集[C];2003年
10 赵春华;张学兵;杨开望;史志华;王天巍;蔡崇法;丁树文;;替代能源措施对三峡地区典型流域土壤侵蚀的影响[A];全国水土保持生态修复研讨会论文汇编[C];2004年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 黄观平;东莞土壤侵蚀59平方公里[N];东莞日报;2013年
2 记者 黄峰 通讯员 肖培青;土壤侵蚀快速调查与水土保持评估方法研究取得突破性进展[N];黄河报;2007年
3 杨旋;土壤侵蚀:触目惊心的黑洞[N];中国国土资源报;2010年
4 记者 郑北鹰;“长治”工程每年约减少土壤侵蚀2亿吨[N];光明日报;2005年
5 记者 杨亚非;轻点鼠标土壤侵蚀了然[N];人民长江报;2006年
6 记者 李力;我国年减少土壤侵蚀15亿吨[N];经济日报;2006年
7 记者 李锋德 李坤;辽宁全国首个完成高分辨率水土流失调查[N];中国水利报;2007年
8 江西省水利厅;江西省第三次土壤侵蚀遥感调查结果[N];江西日报;2004年
9 辽宁省水利厅;辽宁省第四次土壤侵蚀遥感普查成果公报[N];辽宁日报;2007年
10 本报记者 屈遐;水土保持不宜多家管理[N];中国环境报;2000年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 陕永杰;太湖流域典型地区土壤侵蚀特征及其环境效应[D];南京大学;2011年
2 程楠楠;黄土高原土壤侵蚀与地貌形态耦合分析[D];中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心);2016年
3 郁科科;陇中黄土高原土壤侵蚀与气候变化耦合特征及其对人地关系的影响[D];中国科学院研究生院(地球环境研究所);2016年
4 徐仪红;辽东湾沿岸土壤中钚同位素的分布特征及其土壤侵蚀示踪研究[D];南京大学;2014年
5 滕洪芬;基于多源信息的潜在土壤侵蚀估算与数字制图研究[D];浙江大学;2017年
6 陈少辉;遥感影像融合在土壤侵蚀分析中的模型研究[D];华中科技大学;2007年
7 林惠花;典型区域土壤侵蚀的地理学分析[D];福建师范大学;2009年
8 刘洋;岷江源头区植被景观与流域土壤侵蚀的动态相关性[D];中国科学院研究生院(成都生物研究所);2007年
9 华丽;“人—自然”耦合下土壤侵蚀时空演变及其防治区划应用[D];华中农业大学;2013年
10 黄炎和;闽南地区的土壤侵蚀与治理[D];福建师范大学;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 习静雯;黄土高原土地利用变化对土壤侵蚀影响研究[D];中国科学院大学(中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所);2017年
2 杨泽;兴县土壤侵蚀及景观格局研究[D];山西农业大学;2015年
3 尚书;小流域土壤侵蚀评价系统的设计与实现[D];北京林业大学;2015年
4 韦安胜;秦岭北麓面源污染风险评价[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
5 许福慧;黄土区露天煤矿排土场土壤侵蚀治理效益研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2015年
6 闫帅;土壤侵蚀空间估算与土地利用调控研究[D];中国地质大学(北京);2015年
7 苗连朋;黄土丘陵区典型流域植被与水沙变化响应关系模型比较研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
8 李耀军;黄土高原土壤侵蚀时空变化及其对气候变化的响应[D];兰州大学;2015年
9 路彩玲;海原县土地利用变化与土壤侵蚀关系研究[D];宁夏大学;2015年
10 吴胡强;大别山上舍小流域不同林分土壤侵蚀特征研究[D];南京林业大学;2015年
,本文编号:2438200
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/nykj/2438200.html