个人数据安全法律保护研究
发布时间:2018-03-16 19:01
本文选题:个人数据 切入点:个人数据安全 出处:《四川省社会科学院》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着以云存储、云计算为标志的互联网技术不断发展,海量数据所隐藏的价值被不断挖掘,科学技术一方面充当着社会变革者的角色,另一方面打破了旧有社会形态和思维惯性。技术进步冲撞着伦理、道德、法律的藩篱,其中的积极因素可能被社会规则吸收,而消极因素往往就会引起新的社会问题和制度缺漏。我们惊叹于数据在改善社会供需的精准预测和资源配置上发挥的巨大作用,然而数据引发的社会问题——尤其是个人数据安全的问题却不断成为人们生活中的担忧。社会的演进总是处在“创新生产力”与“规避负面性”的漩涡之中,相应的制度保护就应运而生,也可以看做是技术创新而引起社会变革的边际成本。一项制度并不是一个静态的、封闭的概念预设,它随着技术进步、社会形态变迁而不断演化。事实上技术化的数据应用始终走在制度化的个人数据安全保护的前面,使得制度保护在后面疲于追赶,这里面有两重因素,第一重因素是现有的个人数据安全保护理念依旧没有跳出传统模式,旧式思维已经不能适应现代社会形态的复杂性和易变性;第二重因素是即便能够审时度势、创新个人数据安全保护的理念、思路,但在配套的制度设计、决策、执行上停滞不前,造成个人数据安全保护在立法、监管上的脱节。本文分为五个部分,第一部分作为基本概念介绍,对个人数据和个人数据安全分别做了界定和分析;第二部分对传统个人数据安全理论进行解构,分析了个人数据安全法律保护的必要性,为个人数据安全制度的完善引领新的方向;第三部分分析了我国个人数据安全面临的问题和原因;第四部分介绍了外国对相关问题的经验和对我国的启发;第五部分尝试构建我国个人数据安全保护的规制路径。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of Internet technology marked by cloud storage and cloud computing, the hidden value of massive data is constantly being excavated. On the one hand, science and technology are acting as social revolutionaries. On the other hand, it breaks down the old social formation and the inertia of thinking. The technological progress bumps into the barriers of ethics, morality and law, and the positive factors among them may be absorbed by the social rules. Negative factors often lead to new social problems and institutional gaps. We marvel at the enormous role that data plays in improving accurate forecasting of social supply and demand and resource allocation. However, the social problems caused by data-especially the issue of personal data security-have been a constant concern in people's lives. The evolution of society is always in the whirlpool of "innovation productivity" and "avoiding negativity". The corresponding institutional protection arises at the historic moment, and can also be seen as the marginal cost of social change caused by technological innovation. An institution is not a static, closed conceptual presupposition. In fact, the technical data application has always been in front of the institutionalized personal data security protection, which makes the institutional protection tired of catching up. There are two factors in this. The first factor is that the existing concept of personal data security protection is still not out of the traditional mode, the old thinking can no longer adapt to the complexity and variability of modern social formation; the second factor is that even if the situation can be judged, Innovation of personal data security protection concept, ideas, but in supporting system design, decision-making, implementation of stagnation, resulting in personal data security protection in the legislative, regulatory disconnect. This paper is divided into five parts, The first part, as the basic concept, defines and analyzes the personal data and personal data security, the second part deconstructs the traditional personal data security theory, and analyzes the necessity of the legal protection of personal data security. The third part analyzes the problems and causes of personal data security in our country, the 4th part introduces the experiences of foreign countries and enlightens our country. Part 5th attempts to construct the regulation path of personal data security protection in China.
【学位授予单位】:四川省社会科学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.16;TP309
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈红;;个人信息保护的法律问题研究[J];浙江学刊;2008年03期
2 刘s,
本文编号:1621230
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/ruanjiangongchenglunwen/1621230.html