台山市城市总体规划评估研究
[Abstract]:As the legal basis for guiding urban construction and management, urban planning is the public policy to guide, regulate and promote the healthy and orderly development of the city. However, with the accelerating process of urbanization, many urban planning has lost its corresponding role in regulating urban development and has produced a series of urban problems. How to enhance the effectiveness of urban planning and give full play to its guiding role has become an important issue in the field of urban planning in China. As an important part of urban planning system, urban planning evaluation is also the legal requirement of urban planning compilation method and urban and rural planning law in China. Through the planning evaluation can effectively detect, monitor the implementation of the current plan, and get relevant feedback information, so as to make recommendations for planning, policy formulation and planning management amendments, adjustments, Make the operation of urban planning into a virtuous circle. At present, although the relevant research of urban planning assessment theory has been preliminarily carried out in China, some methods of planning evaluation have been explored. However, due to the more contents of urban planning and the influence of uncertain factors, it is difficult to carry out the planning evaluation effectively. In view of the problems existing in the evaluation of urban planning in China, this paper takes Taishan City as an example, discusses the content of the assessment of urban master planning, the construction of evaluation system and the evaluation method. Firstly, this paper summarizes the theoretical basis and practical experience of urban planning assessment at home and abroad, obtains the cognition of urban planning assessment theory and practice, and points out the existing problems of urban planning assessment in China at present. Secondly, taking the recent construction content as the main evaluation object, the evaluation system of urban planning is built around the three dimensions of planning results, planning implementation process and planning implementation effect. Finally, relying on the evaluation system, taking Taishan City as the empirical research object, using the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis method and questionnaire, the evaluation of Taishan City is carried out. The problems existing in the implementation of the plan and the related influencing factors are analyzed, and the relevant suggestions for the revision of the plan are put forward. This paper draws the following conclusions by empirical analysis: through the research on the theory and practice of urban master plan evaluation at home and abroad, combined with the characteristics of the overall planning and implementation of our country. The index system of urban planning evaluation suitable for our country is constructed, and the results of planning preparation, the process of planning implementation and the effect of planning implementation are incorporated into the evaluation system to realize the evaluation of the whole process of urban planning. The index deviation analysis method used in the evaluation results effectively avoids the weighted assignment of the evaluation results which is commonly used in our country at present, and obtains an evaluation score, which can be used to judge the quality of the implementation of the planning.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:TU984.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张旺锋;张祥德;徐佳;;我国城市规划过程中的公众参与体系构建[J];城市发展研究;2009年04期
2 荣西武,李铁,赵荣山;小城镇规划编制与实施评价体系研究[J];城市规划;2005年10期
3 姚燕华;孙翔;王朝晖;彭冲;;广州市控制性规划导则实施评价研究[J];城市规划;2008年02期
4 施源;周丽亚;;对规划评估的理念、方法与框架的初步探讨——以深圳近期建设规划实践为例[J];城市规划;2008年06期
5 欧阳鹏;;公共政策视角下城市规划评估模式与方法初探[J];城市规划;2008年12期
6 汪昭兵;杨永春;杨晓娟;杨永民;;体制变迁下的兰州城市总体规划实施效果分析[J];城市规划;2010年02期
7 孙施文,周宇;城市规划实施评价的理论与方法[J];城市规划汇刊;2003年02期
8 田莉;吕传廷;沈体雁;;城市总体规划实施评价的理论与实证研究——以广州市总体规划(2001-2010年)为例[J];城市规划学刊;2008年05期
9 宋彦;江志勇;杨晓春;陈燕萍;;北美城市规划评估实践经验及启示[J];规划师;2010年03期
10 虞明远;宋兵;;道路运输规划评价指标体系研究——以科学发展观为指导的规划评价指标体系[J];公路交通科技;2006年08期
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 段鹏;城市总体规划实施评估[D];中南大学;2011年
2 张琳;秀山县城市总体规划实施评估研究[D];重庆大学;2010年
3 蒲向军;城市总体规划实施研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
4 费潇;城市总体规划实施评价研究[D];浙江大学;2006年
5 熊斌;长沙市城市总体规划实效性评价研究[D];湖南大学;2006年
6 冯晶艳;居住区规划使用后评估方法研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年
7 沈颖溢;杭州市城市总体规划实施评价研究[D];浙江大学;2010年
8 侯艳玉;城市空间发展与规划目标一致性评估研究[D];山东建筑大学;2012年
,本文编号:2161572
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2161572.html