基于低碳理念的历史文化街区保护利用规划研究
发布时间：2019-06-08 14:21
【摘要】：在发展低碳经济、建设“资源节约型、环境友好型”两型社会应对全球气候问题的战略背景下,历史文化街区的低碳发展显得尤为重要。本文探索性地将低碳理念运用于历史文化街区保护利用规划中,以科学计量碳排放的工具一“碳足迹”为基础,在量化评价的基础上选择最佳方案,提出街区低碳发展策略,实现街区低碳永续发展目标。主要研究结论如下： (1)本文通过碳足迹计量确定建(构)筑物能耗、交通出行方式、居民日常生活、旅游开发是历史文化街区主要碳排放因子。研究表明：①保护整治方式、施工工艺等与历史文化街区建(构)筑物碳排放量紧密联系；②乔灌草复层绿化种植方式对二氧化碳的固定作用最明显；③居民生活用能是日常生活碳足迹的主要来源；④街区旅游开发碳足迹体现在旅游食、住、行、娱、购、游和废弃物等方面。 (2)文章结合太平街历史文化街区保护利用规划案例,将碳足迹量化评价运用于不同整治方案评价中,为决策者选择最低碳排放方案提供依据。 (3)在“碳足迹”量化评价的基础上,创新性地提出低碳理念下历史文化街区保护利用策略,运用低碳技术在街区保护利用的各阶段落实低碳理念,达到营建低碳历史文化街区目标,为历史文化街区的保护利用提供参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:Under the strategic background of developing low-carbon economy and building "resource-saving, environment-friendly" society to deal with global climate problems, the low-carbon development of historical and cultural blocks is particularly important. In this paper, the concept of low carbon is applied to the conservation and utilization planning of historical and cultural blocks. Based on the "carbon footprint", which is a scientific tool for measuring carbon emissions, the best scheme is selected on the basis of quantitative evaluation, and the low carbon development strategy of the block is put forward. To achieve the goal of low-carbon sustainable development in the block. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) in this paper, the energy consumption of buildings, traffic travel mode, daily life of residents and tourism development are the main carbon emission factors of historical and cultural blocks by carbon footprint measurement. The results show that: (1) the protection and treatment methods and construction technology are closely related to the carbon emissions of buildings (structures) in historical and cultural blocks, (2) the effect of planting on carbon dioxide is the most obvious. (3) the energy consumption of residents is the main source of carbon footprint of daily life, and the carbon footprint of tourism development in 4 blocks is reflected in tourism food, housing, travel, entertainment, shopping, travel and waste. (2) combined with the protection and utilization planning case of Taiping Street Historical and Cultural District, the quantitative evaluation of carbon footprint is applied to the evaluation of different renovation schemes, which provides the basis for decision makers to choose the minimum carbon emission scheme. (3) on the basis of quantitative evaluation of "carbon footprint", this paper innovatively puts forward the strategy of protection and utilization of historical and cultural blocks under the concept of low carbon, and implements the concept of low carbon in all stages of block protection and utilization by using low carbon technology. To achieve the goal of building low-carbon historical and cultural blocks, to provide reference and reference for the protection and utilization of historical and cultural blocks.
【学位授予单位】：湖南农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：TU984.114
本文编号：2495352
[Abstract]:Under the strategic background of developing low-carbon economy and building "resource-saving, environment-friendly" society to deal with global climate problems, the low-carbon development of historical and cultural blocks is particularly important. In this paper, the concept of low carbon is applied to the conservation and utilization planning of historical and cultural blocks. Based on the "carbon footprint", which is a scientific tool for measuring carbon emissions, the best scheme is selected on the basis of quantitative evaluation, and the low carbon development strategy of the block is put forward. To achieve the goal of low-carbon sustainable development in the block. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) in this paper, the energy consumption of buildings, traffic travel mode, daily life of residents and tourism development are the main carbon emission factors of historical and cultural blocks by carbon footprint measurement. The results show that: (1) the protection and treatment methods and construction technology are closely related to the carbon emissions of buildings (structures) in historical and cultural blocks, (2) the effect of planting on carbon dioxide is the most obvious. (3) the energy consumption of residents is the main source of carbon footprint of daily life, and the carbon footprint of tourism development in 4 blocks is reflected in tourism food, housing, travel, entertainment, shopping, travel and waste. (2) combined with the protection and utilization planning case of Taiping Street Historical and Cultural District, the quantitative evaluation of carbon footprint is applied to the evaluation of different renovation schemes, which provides the basis for decision makers to choose the minimum carbon emission scheme. (3) on the basis of quantitative evaluation of "carbon footprint", this paper innovatively puts forward the strategy of protection and utilization of historical and cultural blocks under the concept of low carbon, and implements the concept of low carbon in all stages of block protection and utilization by using low carbon technology. To achieve the goal of building low-carbon historical and cultural blocks, to provide reference and reference for the protection and utilization of historical and cultural blocks.
【学位授予单位】：湖南农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：TU984.114
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 曹红葵;;对水泥企业生产环境负荷之浅析[J];新疆环境保护;2009年01期
2 刘顺妮,林宗寿,张小伟;硅酸盐水泥的生命周期评价方法初探[J];中国环境科学;1998年04期
3 刘天星;胡聃;;北京住宅建设的环境影响:1949~2003年——从生命周期角度评价建筑材料的环境影响[J];中国科学院研究生院学报;2006年02期
，本文编号：2495352
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sgjslw/2495352.html
