灼烧底泥抑制内源磷释放的研究
[Abstract]:At present, the mulching method is a kind of in-situ remediation technology for controlling endogenous phosphorus, which is widely concerned at home and abroad, and the sediment and purified water sludge also have a certain adsorption capacity for phosphorus. Therefore, the combination of the two methods is applied to the research of channel restoration. It will be a new way of thinking. In this paper, the adsorption effect of exogenous phosphorus and the distribution of phosphorus in different forms of phosphorus in interstitial water and sediment were studied. The influence of burning mode on the adsorption characteristics of the material and the mechanism of different dosing methods on the transport and transformation of phosphorus in sediment were discussed. The sediment of Meiliang Bay in Taihu Lake, the bottom mud of Shuanghe River in Suzhou and the sewage sludge of a water purification plant in Suzhou were used as experimental materials. In the experiment, the overlying water and the interstitial water were measured by means of Rhizon interstitial water sampler and Unisense microelectrode. The data of various kinds of phosphorus in sediments were analyzed, and the transformation of phosphorus forms among them, as well as the changes of physical and microbial characteristics of microinterfaces in sediments were analyzed. According to the model equation, the method of exogenous phosphorus entering the sediment and the mechanism of the transformation of endogenous phosphorus form in the sediment were discussed. After fitting with Langmuir model, it was found that the sludge had larger maximum phosphorus adsorption capacity (S _ (max), lower P equilibrium concentration (EPC_0) and lower phosphorus saturation (DSP), and that S( max) (8.55 mg kg~ (-1) was larger than that of scorched sludge (2.64 mg kg~ (-1), and the activated sludge had higher P adsorption capacity (S _ (max) (8.55 mg kg~ (-1) than that of burned sludge (2.64 mg kg~ (-1). This shows that the activated sludge has stronger phosphorus adsorption and retention ability. In the study of burning sediment, it was found that 5.985 mg and 5.978 mg of exogenous phosphorus were injected into the sediment after mixing or covering the burnt sediment in the two groups. However, when the sediment is mixed with the burning sediment, 84.18% of the exogenous phosphorus is converted into weakly adsorbed phosphorus, and when the burning sediment is covered in the sediment, the phosphorus in the sediment is released, which mainly comes from Fe/Al-P., which accounts for 87.50% of the total phosphorus in the sediment. These phenomena are attributed to different microenvironments, where mulch is more likely to form anaerobic conditions than mixing. In the study of burning clean water sludge, it was found that the contribution rate of mixing and mulching to the disappearance of phosphorus in overlying water was almost the same, which was obviously higher than that of the control test. However, if the contact probability between the burning water sludge and the overlying water is considered, the phosphorus adsorption capacity of the unit purified water sludge is 2.3 times as much as that under the mulching condition. The dissolved phosphate concentration in interstitial water (1-2cm) was 33.17 times higher than that in mixed water (mean value), which was mainly due to the decrease of dissolved oxygen permeation depth. Under mixed conditions, exogenous phosphorus is easier to form Ca-P, and more NH_4Cl-P and Fe/Al-P are easily released under mulching condition, which implies that the modification of mixing to sediment microenvironment is more favorable to the adsorption of exogenous phosphorus and retention of endogenous phosphorus. From all the experimental results as well as the adsorption of exogenous phosphorus, the control of phosphorus in interstitial water, the transformation of sediment microenvironment, the transformation of endogenous phosphorus forms, etc., although the construction difficulty of blending is greater than that of covering, However, blending technology is promising and can be replaced by "injection of burning water sludge".
【学位授予单位】:苏州科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TV85
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵小蓉;黄应平;高婷;沈颢;刘德富;;三峡大学文思湖底泥分析与评价[J];三峡大学学报(自然科学版);2009年01期
2 付震;廖先容;王学欢;;污水库底泥处理方法探讨[J];海河水利;2009年05期
3 费瑞兴,夏福兴;黄浦江底泥的污染及农业利用[J];水运工程;1987年04期
4 张继育;王劭然;张大磊;;南水北调中线工程京石段干渠底泥吸附铬研究[J];青岛理工大学学报;2013年06期
5 陈荷生,张永健,宋祥甫,邹国燕;太湖底泥生态疏浚技术的初步研究[J];水利水电技术;2004年11期
6 刘沅;朱伟;;底泥处理技术及其在深圳的应用[J];广东水利水电;2012年02期
7 郑习健;珠江广州河段底泥的污染分析[J];长江建设;1996年05期
8 王松;王立彤;魏新庆;;汉沽污水库底泥的环保疏浚试验工程设计[J];中国给水排水;2011年04期
9 贾利;淮河干流及京杭大运河底泥中砷、镉、铅和锌的分布初探[J];水资源保护;1991年01期
10 魏敬池;;水库蓄泄过程对底泥质量的影响[J];水科学与工程技术;2013年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 罗锴;吴烈善;杨希;廖育思;;城市内湖底泥氮营养释放的实验研究[A];中国环境科学学会2009年学术年会论文集(第三卷)[C];2009年
2 杨磊;胥峥;林逢凯;高逸秀;张萌;;城市富营养化河道底泥中微生物的新陈代谢能力研究[A];中国环境科学学会2006年学术年会优秀论文集(上卷)[C];2006年
3 汤红亮;张新周;朱明成;李勇;;江苏淮安市里运河底泥吸附与释放数模研究[A];Proceedings of Conference on Environmental Pollution and Public Health(CEPPH 2012)[C];2012年
4 刘军;程晓宏;邹国明;佘年;王琦;;城市河道底泥生物修复技术研究进展[A];中国河道治理与生态修复技术专刊[C];2010年
5 刘凌;崔广柏;;太湖底泥氮污染分布规律及生态风险研究[A];太湖高级论坛交流文集[C];2004年
6 陈荷生;房玲娣;张永健;蒋英姿;;太湖底泥生态疏浚研究与探讨[A];太湖高级论坛交流文集[C];2004年
7 殷效玲;周立;郑祥民;;上海市苏州河市区段支流底泥污染研究[A];海峡两岸地理学术研讨会暨2001年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2001年
8 杨卓;王永福;郝红;王殿武;;白洋淀底泥重金属污染评价研究[A];人水和谐及新疆水资源可持续利用——中国科协2005学术年会论文集[C];2005年
9 成新;江溢;蒋英姿;;太湖底泥与污染情况调查[A];太湖高级论坛交流文集[C];2004年
10 唐燕萍;马利民;林匡飞;;伊乐藻控制河道底泥中磷营养盐释放的效果[A];2007中国可持续发展论坛暨中国可持续发展学术年会论文集(2)[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 记者 刘永明;大沙河含砷污染底泥处理完毕[N];中国化工报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 张建华;太湖生态清淤关键技术及效果研究[D];南京大学;2011年
2 魏明蓉;受污染武汉南湖底泥特征分析及其处置方法研究[D];武汉理工大学;2012年
3 黄建军;城市河道底泥营养盐释放及化学修复研究[D];天津大学;2009年
4 李剑超;河湖底泥有机污染物迁移转化规律研究[D];河海大学;2002年
5 李功振;京杭大运河(苏北段)底泥重金属污染与释放规律研究[D];中国矿业大学;2009年
6 孙远军;城市河流底泥污染与原位稳定化研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2009年
7 林建伟;地表水体底泥氮磷污染原位控制技术及相关机理研究[D];同济大学;2006年
8 张志红;疏浚底泥污染物在粘土防渗层中的运移规律研究[D];北京交通大学;2007年
9 童敏;城市污染河道底泥疏浚与吹填的重金属环境行为及生态风险研究[D];华东师范大学;2014年
10 常素云;城市河道生物修复技术研究[D];天津大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨s,
本文编号:2282366
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2282366.html