侧槽溢洪道水力特性模型试验与数值模拟研究
[Abstract]:In order to study the hydraulic characteristics and the downstream erosion of the side-channel spillway, the physical model test of the side-channel spillway is carried out, and the numerical simulation of the prototype is carried out using the parameters obtained from the experiment, and the flow pattern, the water surface line, the pressure and the flow rate in the side-tank spillway are analyzed. Downstream scour, etc., the results can be referred to for similar projects. The main research results of the paper are as follows: (1) The discharge value under various working conditions is greater than the design value, and the spillway discharge capacity meets the requirements; the flow coefficient of the side weir is increased slowly with the increase of the water head, and the value is between 0.385 and 0.499. (2) The section of the side dam section, the side groove section, the parabolic section, the straight slope section and the anti-arc section meet the over-current requirements: the section of the section of the section of the steep slope of the spillway tunnel does not meet the requirements; the height of the side wall of the open channel section meets the requirements; the height of the right wall of the bucket section is insufficient, and the section is required to be locally increased. The minimum water flow cavitation number of the spillway section of the spillway is near the end of the arc section, with a minimum of about 0.97-1.16, the maximum point flow rate of the section is about 16.4 m/ s and not more than 30 m/ s. (3) The slope ratio of the upstream slope of the scour hole under the nose and the nose is 1/ 2.5, the energy dissipation requirement is not met, and the water jet is directly flushed to the root of the bank of the other bank. The water flow in the four optimized integrated types of the nose cone can avoid the direct flushing of the root of the mountain bag on the other side of the bucket, and the degree of lateral diffusion of the ejection water tongue in the three body types is larger than that of the original body. The result of the comprehensive comparison is that the shape of the tongue-like shape and the hydraulic parameters of the optimized body 3 are the best. (4) The water flow in the spillway of the opposite side of the Fluent software is simulated, and the results of the numerical simulation are as high as the result of the model test from the flow pattern, the water surface line, the section flow rate and the pressure comparison of the selected flow section. It is indicated that the method is suitable for the simulation of the article.
【学位授予单位】:西安理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TV135.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 Richard J.Mc Sherry;Ken V.Chua;Thorsten Stoesser;;Large eddy simulation of free-surface flows[J];Journal of Hydrodynamics;2017年01期
2 秦翠翠;邵学军;周建银;周刚;肖毅;;环流修正模型对连续弯道水流模拟的适用性分析[J];清华大学学报(自然科学版);2016年12期
3 王青;黄细彬;;基于Flow-3D的陡坡弯道水流三维数值模拟[J];水资源与水工程学报;2016年05期
4 张林;;水电站溢洪道空化数分布及抗空蚀措施分析[J];水利科技与经济;2016年07期
5 张立群;;断面宽高比对弯道水流水力特性影响分析[J];黑龙江水利科技;2016年05期
6 李建波;李礼;;张峰水库溢洪道水力特性三维数值模拟[J];太原理工大学学报;2015年06期
7 杨吉健;刘韩生;文明宜;曹长冲;安梦雄;;台阶式溢洪道阶顶过流断面弗劳德数沿程变化研究[J];水力发电学报;2015年06期
8 王磊;刁明军;朱润野;闫谨;;“M”形台阶溢洪道的消能特性[J];水力发电学报;2015年05期
9 高梦露;刘亚坤;孙洪亮;高东红;;阶梯式溢洪道的数值模拟研究[J];水利与建筑工程学报;2015年02期
10 杨磊;徐宏亮;唐培磊;刘彬;李栋;;许家崖水库溢洪道消能防冲方案模型试验研究[J];水力发电学报;2014年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张岩;洞式溢洪道的水力特性试验及数值模拟研究[D];大连理工大学;2015年
2 宿祺;团山子水利枢纽工程溢洪道模型试验研究[D];大连理工大学;2014年
3 朱金龙;昌马水库溢洪道改建工程模型试验及数值模拟研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2013年
本文编号:2434613
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2434613.html