可靠度计算方法的改进及其在核电厂防波堤稳定性中的应用
[Abstract]:The breakwater in the nuclear power project mainly provides protection for the plant area of the nuclear power plant and water collection and drainage facilities such as circulating cooling water and nuclear safety water to protect it from the wave attack and to protect the pumping station from the influence of the wave. The foundation is usually shoreline subsoil with poor engineering properties, which is easy to cause geological disasters under earthquake and other external effects, and its stability has a great influence on the normal operation of the plant area and drainage facilities. It is not enough to evaluate the stability of breakwater foundation soil and embankment material by safety factor, but the reliability of breakwater in nuclear power engineering is less studied at present. In this paper, a new sample sampling method is studied. On the basis of the traditional response surface method and the improved Kriging model, the function is constructed, and then the reliability analysis is carried out by using the Hasofer-Lind reliability index calculation method. Firstly, the reliability of breakwater is studied by using the traditional quadratic polynomial response surface. Since the response surface method is used to calculate the reliability of structures, it is necessary to iterate until the reliability index converges. In each iteration, new samples are taken near the current check point to construct the response surface. For complex problems, it takes a lot of calculation time for each sampling. In this paper, an improved method of response surface construction-sample accumulation method is proposed, that is, the new sample is used to construct the response surface together with all the samples prior to this iteration, so that the information of the existing sample points can be used to the maximum extent. The reliability iteration can avoid the problem that it is difficult to converge in local extremum or reciprocating oscillation, and the computational efficiency is improved. If only the sample points close to the limit state surface are selected to participate in the construction of cumulative and response surfaces, the computational efficiency can be further improved. Two examples are given to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the sample accumulation method. Finally, the stability and reliability of the breakwater of a nuclear power project are analyzed by the improved method. The traditional response surface method often uses quadratic polynomial to construct the function, which makes it difficult to fit the implicit limit state surface with high nonlinearity, and is sensitive to the selection of sampling center and sampling method. In this paper, the global optimization ability of particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used to improve the Kriging model, solve the optimization problem of related parameters, and can better simulate the implicit limit state surface with high nonlinearity. The method of sample accumulation is still used in the selection of samples. An example shows that the improved Kriging model based on sample accumulation can fit the limit state surface very well, and the efficiency and accuracy are greatly improved compared with the traditional response surface method. Furthermore, it is found that selecting the sample point close to the limit state surface to construct the sample accumulation and function can improve the computational efficiency. According to the example of slope stability reliability analysis, it is found that it is appropriate to select the sample point with safety factor in the range of [0.9, 1.1] to accumulate. The improved Kriging model based on sample accumulation is not sensitive to sampling center and sampling method, and has better adaptability. Finally, the reliability of breakwater stability in a nuclear power project is analyzed.
【学位授予单位】:大连理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TM623;U656.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马栋和;王常明;杨树才;吴谦;朱海波;;两种Rosenblueth改进法分析边坡稳定可靠度[J];吉林大学学报(地球科学版);2011年S1期
2 谭晓慧;边坡稳定可靠度分析方法的探讨[J];重庆大学学报(自然科学版);2001年06期
3 杨继红;刘汉东;秦四清;董金玉;孙强;李厚恩;;考虑土性参数空间变异性的边坡可靠度分析[J];工程地质学报;2007年02期
4 张崎;李兴斯;;结构可靠性分析的模拟重要抽样方法[J];工程力学;2007年01期
5 范昭平;吴勇信;;考虑土性参数概率分布对边坡可靠度的影响[J];公路;2010年01期
6 余大胜;康海贵;;响应面法计算结构可靠度的回顾[J];工业建筑;2006年S1期
7 黄辉;思林水电站边坡稳定可靠度分析[J];贵州工业大学学报;1997年03期
8 赵维涛,安伟光,严心池;二阶二次矩可靠性指标[J];哈尔滨工程大学学报;2004年02期
9 谭海涛;徐定海;王善;;一种计算结构可靠度的一元分解法[J];哈尔滨工程大学学报;2009年08期
10 吴坤铭;王建国;谭晓慧;毕卫华;;基于可靠度敏感性的2种响应面法研究边坡稳定性[J];合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版);2011年08期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 高月华;基于kriging代理模型的优化设计方法及其在注塑成型中的应用[D];大连理工大学;2009年
2 吴振君;土体参数空间变异性模拟和土坡可靠度分析方法应用研究[D];中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所);2009年
3 赵威;结构可靠度分析代理模型方法研究[D];哈尔滨工业大学;2012年
,本文编号:2453677
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/shuiwenshuili/2453677.html