盛大文学诉百度侵权案法律分析
发布时间：2018-08-03 17:11
【摘要】：网络著作权是传统著作权在网络环境下的延伸。随着互联网的普及,网络技术的发展对著作权的影响犹如一枚硬币,一面促进知识的传播,一面又冲击现有的保护体系。近几年在我国兴起的网络小说热不仅催生了不计其数的网络职业写手,并且有人凭借其过人的头脑和出众的文采一夜成名,而且为网络文学市场带来了巨大的利润空间。与此同时,网络盗版作品的泛滥使网络著作权的侵权现象变得不足为奇。更糟糕的是,网络侵权问题的复杂性又给权利人的权利救济增加了难度。因此,重构著作权的保护体系已经迫在眉睫。 在绝大多数的网络侵权的案件中,网络服务提供商都扮演了一种特殊的角色。百度作为全球最大的中文搜索引擎,在推动我国的互联网发展方面可谓是有目共睹。由于涉及的问题较为复杂,盛大文学诉百度案一度被视为网络著作权类侵权案件的典型而引起广泛关注,百度也因此被推向风口浪尖。笔者通过分析该案,对该案涉及的有关著作权之法律问题进行解析,发现我国对网络著作权保护方面的不足,并就此发表拙见,旨在完善著作权保护体系,从而加强对网络著作权的保护力度。本文分四部分： 第一部分,对案情进行回顾,介绍案件争议焦点与引发的法律问题。 第二部分,对本案涉及的著作权相关内容、网络著作权侵权责任的认定以及责任的豁免进行分析,并就存在的问题提出笔者的主张。 第三部分,对本案的争议焦点和引发的法律问题予以定论。 第四部分,对完善我国著作权保护的相关办法提出浅见。
[Abstract]:Network copyright is the extension of traditional copyright in the network environment. With the popularization of the Internet, the influence of the development of network technology on copyright is like a coin, which not only promotes the spread of knowledge, but also impinges on the existing protection system. In recent years, the popularity of network novels in our country has not only given birth to countless network professional writers, but also some people have become famous overnight with their superior minds and outstanding literary talent, and have brought huge profit space to the network literature market. At the same time, the proliferation of network pirated works makes the infringement of network copyright become unsurprising. To make matters worse, the complexity of network infringement makes it more difficult for right holders to remedy their rights. Therefore, it is urgent to reconstruct the copyright protection system. In the vast majority of network infringement cases, network service providers have played a special role. Baidu as the world's largest Chinese search engine, in promoting China's Internet development is obvious to all. Due to the complexity of the issues involved, Shanda Literature v. Baidu case was once regarded as a typical network copyright infringement case and caused widespread concern, and Baidu was pushed to the forefront. By analyzing the case, the author analyzes the legal problems involved in the case, and finds out the deficiencies in the protection of network copyright in our country, and puts forward some opinions on this, in order to perfect the copyright protection system. So as to strengthen the protection of network copyright. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part reviews the case, introduces the focus of the case dispute and legal issues. The second part analyzes the copyright related content of this case, the network copyright tort liability and the exemption of liability, and puts forward the author's opinion on the existing problems. The third part, the focus of the dispute and the legal issues caused by the conclusion. The fourth part, to perfect our country copyright protection related method puts forward the simple opinion.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2162420
[Abstract]:Network copyright is the extension of traditional copyright in the network environment. With the popularization of the Internet, the influence of the development of network technology on copyright is like a coin, which not only promotes the spread of knowledge, but also impinges on the existing protection system. In recent years, the popularity of network novels in our country has not only given birth to countless network professional writers, but also some people have become famous overnight with their superior minds and outstanding literary talent, and have brought huge profit space to the network literature market. At the same time, the proliferation of network pirated works makes the infringement of network copyright become unsurprising. To make matters worse, the complexity of network infringement makes it more difficult for right holders to remedy their rights. Therefore, it is urgent to reconstruct the copyright protection system. In the vast majority of network infringement cases, network service providers have played a special role. Baidu as the world's largest Chinese search engine, in promoting China's Internet development is obvious to all. Due to the complexity of the issues involved, Shanda Literature v. Baidu case was once regarded as a typical network copyright infringement case and caused widespread concern, and Baidu was pushed to the forefront. By analyzing the case, the author analyzes the legal problems involved in the case, and finds out the deficiencies in the protection of network copyright in our country, and puts forward some opinions on this, in order to perfect the copyright protection system. So as to strengthen the protection of network copyright. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part reviews the case, introduces the focus of the case dispute and legal issues. The second part analyzes the copyright related content of this case, the network copyright tort liability and the exemption of liability, and puts forward the author's opinion on the existing problems. The third part, the focus of the dispute and the legal issues caused by the conclusion. The fourth part, to perfect our country copyright protection related method puts forward the simple opinion.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 王迁;;发达国家网络版权司法保护的现状与趋势[J];法律适用;2009年12期
2 陈锦川;;关于网络技术服务提供者侵权责任几个问题的研究[J];法律适用;2011年06期
3 吴汉东;;网络时代的版权产业和版权保护问题[J];法人杂志;2009年01期
4 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
5 王迁;;论“网络传播行为”的界定及其侵权认定[J];法学;2006年05期
6 王迁;;《信息网络传播权保护条例》中“避风港”规则的效力[J];法学;2010年06期
7 吴汉东;;论网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任[J];中国法学;2011年02期
8 张新宝;任鸿雁;;互联网上的侵权责任:《侵权责任法》第36条解读[J];中国人民大学学报;2010年04期
9 王迁;;“WAP搜索”及相关服务著作权侵权问题研究[J];知识产权;2012年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 何悦;网络著作权侵权责任研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
，本文编号：2162420
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sousuoyinqinglunwen/2162420.html
