“网页快照”著作权侵权问题探析
发布时间：2018-08-20 13:08
【摘要】：几乎所有的搜索引擎都推出“网页快照”服务,它是搜索引擎在收录网页时,对网页进行备份,存在自己的服务器缓存里,以供用户使用的技术。该服务已成为搜索引擎的一项重要而具有特色的专项技术服务。但是,这样一项被搜索引擎普遍应用,深受喜爱的技术,由于涉嫌侵犯原权利所有人的复制权和信息网络传播权,从其推广至今,屡屡被诉。在此尴尬格局下究竟该如何定性此行为的性质,如何平衡各方利益,给予这种技术找一个法律上出口,以上问题无论是学界还是实务界都没有达成共识。因此,本文首先对“网页快照”行为的法律性质进行界定,在认定其构成著作权法上的复制和信息网络传播行为的基础上,进一步对其著作权侵权责任认定详尽分析,认为“网页快照”侵权为直接侵权,应该适用无过错归责原则。接下来对“网页快照”侵权责任可能适用各种免责事由的合理性与可行性进行探讨,得出系统缓存避风港规则不能适用于“网页快照”；我国的“限制与例外”在适用时存在许多法律上的障碍；默示许可有其合理性,应该在法律上给予确认。最后从合理使用与默示许可两个方面对我国相关法律制度的完善提出建议,以期建立一个“一般条款+特别列举”模式的合理使用制度和一个有限制的默示许可原则。
[Abstract]:Almost all search engines have launched a "web snapshot" service. It is a technology that the search engine backs up the web pages when it collects them and stores them in its own server cache for users to use. Generally used and well-loved technologies have been repeatedly prosecuted since they were suspected of infringing the copyright and the right to disseminate information on the Internet of the original owners of the rights. In this embarrassing situation, how to determine the nature of the act, how to balance the interests of all parties, and how to give the technology a legal export, the above issues are still in academic circles. Therefore, this paper first defines the legal nature of the act of "web snapshot". On the basis of affirming that it constitutes copyright law copying and information network dissemination, it further analyzes in detail the determination of copyright infringement liability and holds that the infringement of "web snapshot" is a direct infringement. Next, the author discusses the rationality and feasibility of various exemptions that may be applicable to the tort liability of "web snapshot", and draws the conclusion that the rules of system caching haven can not be applied to "web snapshot"; there are many legal obstacles in the application of "restrictions and exceptions"; implied permission has its own characteristics. The rationality should be confirmed in law. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the relevant legal system in China from two aspects of rational use and implied license, with a view to establishing a reasonable use system of "general clause + special enumeration" model and a limited implied license principle.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2193714
[Abstract]:Almost all search engines have launched a "web snapshot" service. It is a technology that the search engine backs up the web pages when it collects them and stores them in its own server cache for users to use. Generally used and well-loved technologies have been repeatedly prosecuted since they were suspected of infringing the copyright and the right to disseminate information on the Internet of the original owners of the rights. In this embarrassing situation, how to determine the nature of the act, how to balance the interests of all parties, and how to give the technology a legal export, the above issues are still in academic circles. Therefore, this paper first defines the legal nature of the act of "web snapshot". On the basis of affirming that it constitutes copyright law copying and information network dissemination, it further analyzes in detail the determination of copyright infringement liability and holds that the infringement of "web snapshot" is a direct infringement. Next, the author discusses the rationality and feasibility of various exemptions that may be applicable to the tort liability of "web snapshot", and draws the conclusion that the rules of system caching haven can not be applied to "web snapshot"; there are many legal obstacles in the application of "restrictions and exceptions"; implied permission has its own characteristics. The rationality should be confirmed in law. Finally, some suggestions are put forward to perfect the relevant legal system in China from two aspects of rational use and implied license, with a view to establishing a reasonable use system of "general clause + special enumeration" model and a limited implied license principle.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁慧星;;中国侵权责任法解说[J];北方法学;2011年01期
2 王迁;;搜索引擎提供“快照”服务的著作权侵权问题研究[J];东方法学;2010年03期
3 郭威;;默示许可在版权法中的演进与趋势[J];东方法学;2012年03期
4 赵莉;质疑网络版权中“默示许可”的法律地位[J];电子知识产权;2003年12期
5 周春慧;;版权之权利限制应适度[J];电子知识产权;2009年07期
6 吕炳斌;;网络时代的版权默示许可制度——两起Google案的分析[J];电子知识产权;2009年07期
7 阮开欣;;网页快照著作权问题探究——美国的司法实践及借鉴[J];电子知识产权;2010年06期
8 乔生;;网络版权保护的趋势与发展——兼论合理使用的抗争[J];法学杂志;2009年02期
9 梅术文;;信息网络传播权默示许可制度的不足与完善[J];法学;2009年06期
10 王迁;;《信息网络传播权保护条例》中“避风港”规则的效力[J];法学;2010年06期
，本文编号：2193714
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/sousuoyinqinglunwen/2193714.html
