两种采血方法在血液常规检验中的应用效果比较

发布时间：2018-01-26 09:57

本文关键词： 静脉血末梢血血常规检验　出处：《河南医学研究》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的对比两种采血方法在血液常规检验中的应用价值。方法选择2014年5月至2015年5月在内黄县人民医院行血常规检验患者170例作为研究对象,所有患者均同期采用静脉采血法与末梢采血法进行血液常规检验。对两种检验结果进行回顾性分析。结果在血常规检验中,静脉血红细胞计数(RBC)、白细胞计数(WBC)、血小板(PLT)、血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞比容(HCT)等指标与末梢血比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);两组平均红细胞体积(MCV)与平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论血常规检验中两种采血方法检验结果存在一定差异,其中静脉采取法检验结果具有准确、稳定等优势,临床应用价值更为显著。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the application value of two blood collection methods in routine blood test. Methods 170 patients with blood routine examination were selected from May 2014 to May 2015 in Neihuang County people's Hospital. All the patients were tested with venous blood collection method and peripheral blood sampling method at the same time. The results of the two tests were analyzed retrospectively. Results in the blood routine examination, the red blood cell count of vein blood was counted (RBC). Compared with peripheral blood, WBC count, PLT, HB and HCT were significantly higher than those in peripheral blood (P 0.05). The mean erythrocyte volume (MCV) and mean erythrocyte hemoglobin concentration (MCHCC) were compared between the two groups. Conclusion there are some differences between the two methods in blood routine examination, among which the results of vein sampling method have the advantages of accuracy and stability. The clinical application value is more obvious.
【作者单位】：内黄县人民医院检验科;
【分类号】：R446.11
【正文快照】： 血常规检验是一种临床最为基础的检验项目,人体血液中主要有红细胞、白细胞、血小板3种不同功能的细胞,其对机体多种病变均有显著的敏感性,血常规即通过对上述3种细胞数量、形态、分布的变化判断病情发展趋势[1]。临床上最常见的两种血常规检验方式为末梢血与静脉血,末梢血采

【相似文献】