在基层医院舒适护理对胃镜检查患者焦虑状况的影响

发布时间：2018-03-04 05:02

本文选题：舒适度　切入点：胃镜　出处：《中外医学研究》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:研究对于基层医院接受胃镜检查的患者提供舒适护理服务的应用效果。方法:以笔者所在医院2014年5月-2015年5月收治接受胃镜检查的58例患者,为常规组,以2015年6月-2016年8月收治的患者58例为干预组,常规组患者接受一般胃镜检查流程与服务,干预组患者接受舒适护理干预措施,观察两组患者舒适度评价及对临床护理服务满意度,总结患者干预前后SAS评分结果。结果:常规组患者对于临床提供的护理服务措施满意度为72.41%,干预组为98.28%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。常规组患者对于术前心理紧张缓解度、身心不适症状、恶心呕吐表现、紧张焦虑心理等指标评分均低于干预组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。干预前,两组SAS评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);干预后,干预组患者SAS评分较高,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对于临床接受胃镜检查的患者提供检查期间舒适护理服务,大部分患者主诉对护理服务满意度较高,且患者舒适度评分较高,焦虑心理状态得到缓解,值得临床推广应用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to study the effect of comfortable nursing care for patients undergoing gastroscopy in primary hospital. Methods: 58 patients with gastroscopy were treated in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2015 as routine group. From June 2015 to August 2016, 58 patients were treated as intervention group. Patients in routine group received general gastroscopy examination procedure and service, and patients in intervention group received comfortable nursing intervention. The evaluation of comfort and satisfaction with clinical nursing care were observed in the two groups. Results: the satisfaction degree of patients in routine group and intervention group was 72.41 and 98.285.There was significant difference between routine group and intervention group (P 0.05). The scores of physical and mental discomfort, nausea and vomiting, anxiety and anxiety were significantly lower than those in the intervention group (P 0.05). Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in SAS scores between the two groups (P 0.05), but after intervention, the SAS score of the patients in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group. Conclusion: for the patients undergoing gastroscopy, most of them have higher satisfaction with nursing service and higher score of comfort. Anxiety state has been alleviated, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
【作者单位】：安岳县人民医院;
【分类号】：R473.5

【相似文献】