新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病恢复期患儿家长焦虑抑郁状况及影响因素分析
[Abstract]:Background Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is one of the main causes of neurological impairment in infants and young children. Children often need long-term treatment and rehabilitation. Parents are the main caregivers of children. Their own factors play an important role in the treatment and rehabilitation of children with HIE. Children as parents of psychological stress events, coping improperly may appear anxiety, depression and other psychological problems, serious can cause psychological disorders, affecting the quality of treatment and care of children. Methods 196 parents of HIE convalescent children in the Department of pediatric rehabilitation in four tertiary general hospitals of Henan Province from October 2014 to October 2015 were selected as the subjects. General data questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and depression scale and Chinese version of family intimacy were used. The scores of anxiety and depression, family function and social support were investigated with the Adaptability Scale, Social Support Rating Scale and SPSS19.0 software. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis, t test, variance analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Results 1. The scores of anxiety and depression of parents of HIE convalescent children were 9.43 (+). 3.62, the score of depression was 9.19 + 3.83, about 70% had different degrees of anxiety and depression tendency, of which about 40% certainly had anxiety and depression. 2. Univariate analysis showed that different educational background, occupation, family relationship, personality characteristics, residence, understanding of the disease, self-perceived stress and care for different months, HIE level, rehabilitation course of treatment. Parents of children with anxiety scores were statistically significant (P 0.05); different educational background, residence, self-perceived pressure, payment methods and care for different months, HIE degree, rehabilitation course of parents of children with depression scores were statistically significant (P 0.05). 3. Family function, family actual cohesion and There was no significant difference between the domestic norms (P 0.05). Ideal intimacy, intimacy dissatisfaction, adaptability dissatisfaction were higher than the norm, actual adaptability and ideal adaptability were lower than the norm (P 0.05). The scores of anxiety and depression were negatively correlated with family actual intimacy, actual adaptability, and both were negatively correlated with intimacy dissatisfaction and adaptability dissatisfaction. The scores of social support were higher than those of domestic norm (P 0.05). The social support level was moderate or higher, of which 79.1% was moderate and 20.9% was high. The scores of anxiety and depression were all higher than those of social support, objective support and subjective support. Social support utilization was negatively correlated (P 0.05). Regression analysis showed that self-perceived stress, objective support score, HIE level, social support utilization, personality characteristics, residence, intimacy dissatisfaction entered the regression equation with anxiety score as dependent variable, and together effectively explained 39.5% of the variance (P 0.05); self-perceived stress, and intimacy dissatisfaction. Objective support score, social support utilization and rehabilitation course all entered regression equation with depression score as dependent variable, which explained 36.1% of variance (P 0.05). Among them, objective support score and social support utilization were all negative influencing factors of parents'anxiety and depression scores. Conclusion 1. Long emotional state is not optimistic, anxiety, depression scores are at a higher level. General demographic sociological data, self-perceived stress, personality characteristics, residence, HIE degree, rehabilitation course are the main factors affecting parents'anxiety and depression. 2. HIE recovery period of children's parents' family function status needs to be improved. Family cohesion dissatisfaction is an important factor affecting the level of anxiety. 3. The parents of HIE convalescent children have moderate social support. The more social support they receive, the lower the level of anxiety and depression.
【学位授予单位】:新乡医学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:R473.74
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王玲,叶明志,赵耕源,梁超莲;653对中年夫妻婚姻现状及影响因素探讨[J];中国行为医学科学;1997年03期
2 秦新红;桑文华;李丽英;;网瘾家庭环境、父母教养方式、亲密度和适应性的病例对照研究[J];现代预防医学;2010年22期
3 翁正,张敬悬,刘庆桂,,李洪泉,赵胜春,陈万香,徐作国,任洪岱;农村自杀未遂者家庭环境、亲密度及适应性的对照研究[J];中国心理卫生杂志;1996年04期
4 杨祺;;危险! 宠物出没[J];时尚育儿;2012年03期
5 曾昭祥,刘琳,房茂盛,李志成,高新学;精神分裂症患者家庭环境、父母教养方式以及亲密度和适应性的调查分析[J];四川精神卫生;2004年01期
6 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 梁晓燕;黄燕;魏岚;;宿舍亲密度和适应性与大学生孤独感的关系研究[A];全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会论文摘要集[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报记者 张元章;父母如何教育“不听话”的孩子?[N];珠海特区报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 王永刚;以数据为中心的在线社会网络若干安全问题研究[D];北京大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 谭景麟;基于社交关系图谱的移动社交设计研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
2 李彤;亲社会花费对幸福感的影响:人际亲密度的边界作用[D];曲阜师范大学;2015年
3 张玉婷;基于等级反应模型和评定量表模型的青少年亲子关系亲密度量表编制[D];贵州师范大学;2016年
4 王俊力;恋人间实际亲密度对自我面孔优势效应的影响[D];西南大学;2016年
5 单胜华;新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病恢复期患儿家长焦虑抑郁状况及影响因素分析[D];新乡医学院;2016年
6 华烨;基于相对关系亲密度的局部社团发现算法研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2014年
7 霍丽婕;以增加亲密度为目的的会话分析[D];复旦大学;2013年
8 曹坤宇;基于亲密度及影响力的微博社交兴趣圈挖掘算法研究[D];天津大学;2013年
9 王伟伟;人际亲密度对自我道德行为的影响[D];宁波大学;2014年
10 赵天宸;彩印SNS用户亲密度模型的设计与实现[D];北京邮电大学;2013年
本文编号:2251106
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/linchuangyixuelunwen/2251106.html