文献与田野间的双向阅读——西方社会科学与中国传统人文学相结合的人类学之路

发布时间：2018-01-07 06:11

本文关键词：文献与田野间的双向阅读——西方社会科学与中国传统人文学相结合的人类学之路　出处：《探索与争鸣》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：迄今为止,中国人类学的主流依旧采用西方的田野工作方法来从事调查研究。然而,单纯的田野研究很难适应有着悠久历史文献累积的中国,因为历代精英和国家制造的文本已经深深地影响并形塑了中国的底层社会。"文献与田野间的双向阅读"旨在强调文献中国研究和经验中国研究的结合,强调从中国古典文献中寻找做人类学的智慧,希望走一条带有强烈传统人文学色彩的中国人类学道路。至于新媒体时代的双向阅读,则穿梭于"文献世界"、"真实世界"和"虚拟世界"三界之间。文献世界、真实世界是网络虚拟社会的文化底色与根本语法规则,网络虚拟世界未衍生出新的组织社会的语法逻辑。但愿保守的态度与乐观地期望网络能产生新的社会文化模式的积极态度,构成一种互补,学术上彼此映发。
[Abstract]:So far, the mainstream China anthropological fieldwork method is still used to engage in western research. However, it is difficult to adapt to the field of literature has a long history of accumulation of China, because the elite and the national manufacturing text has deeply influenced and shaped the underlying social China. "Two-way reading and literature the field aims to emphasize the literature research and experience research Chinese Chinese, for the wisdom from anthropology China classical literature, hope to learn a human China road with a strong traditional humanities color. As for the two-way reading in the new media era, the shuttle in" world literature "," real world "and the" virtual world "three realms. Literature world, the real world is virtual social cultural background and the basic rules of grammar, the virtual world not derived from the new social organization language Legal logic. I hope that the conservative attitude and optimistic expectation that the network can produce a new social and cultural model of the positive attitude, form a complementary, academically showing each other.

【作者单位】：青岛大学法学院;青岛大学历史人类学研究中心;
【分类号】：C912.4
【正文快照】： 对于人类学家来说,开展田野调查几乎是人人志、碑刻、个人著述和民间文书等,进行民族志书写都能进行的工作。甚至某种程度上而言,田野工作或重构民间社会历史(这在社会史领域尤其如此),(field work)是人类学家身份的一个标签。这在专业本文并不指这一类泛泛的研究。这样的研究

【相似文献】