宝钢发展过程的政府干预研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 02:22

本文选题：宝钢发展 + 政府干预　；参考：《华南理工大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：政府经济职能的内容中,很重要的一方面就是保持宏观经济的稳定性。稳定的宏观经济是市场活动的主体的共同要求;实践表明,市场的自我组织机制不可能消除经济周期性波动,唯有依靠政府的宏观调控才有可能缓解波动。改革开放初期,国内各行各业开始走上新的发展道路,钢材作为国家发展的重要战略物质,变得尤为稀缺;宝钢集团被称为中国改革开放的产物,1978年12月23日,就在十一届三中全会闭幕的第二天,在中国上海宝山区长江之畔打下第一根桩;随着我国经济规模的快速增长,我国钢铁企业也随之迅猛发展,无论是钢铁企业的数量,还是钢铁产量,都在突飞猛进,逐步由产品稀缺变成产能过剩。从1996年起,国家就开始通过相关宏观调控政策限制钢铁行业进一步盲目扩张,但政策的效果不明显,主要是抑制企业规模扩大意愿的市场条件没有形成,与各地区的快速发展势头不相符。一方面,在国民经济的快速发展和大规模投资的拉动下,钢材需求快速增长,带动钢铁产能增长;另一方面,钢铁企业即便是在微利的情况下,仍然有增产扩能的冲动,地方政府处于某些方面的原因,也在一定程度上推动了钢铁产能的扩张。近期,国务院又出台相关的指导意见,对钢铁行业的发展做进一步的规划。从改革开放初期到现阶段,政府干预从没间断过。本论文主要从市场与制度的角度出发,以国家投资大型钢铁企业为切入点,对近年来关于政府干预对钢铁行业的影响进行了回顾和总结,包括政府干预相关理论、政府干预对钢铁企业经营行为的影响、政府干预与企业绩效等方面;再阐述钢铁企业伴随着国家经济的发展而壮大,剖析现阶段国家对钢铁企业发展战略的规划,探讨行政制度对钢铁企业战略和行为的影响机制。本文主要通过大量的数据分析,政策、文件对比,定性、定量结合分析的方法,以钢铁行业代表宝钢为主要切入点,分析政府干预的时机、手段、效果等等,讨论政府干预的合法性,阐述市场、企业与政府干预的关系及相互的作用。
[Abstract]:In the content of the government economic function, the very important aspect is to maintain the macroeconomic stability. The stable macro-economy is the common requirement of the main body of market activities, and the practice shows that the self-organizing mechanism of the market can not eliminate the cyclical fluctuation of the economy, and only by relying on the macro-control of the government can the fluctuation be alleviated. At the beginning of reform and opening up, domestic industries began to embark on a new development path, and steel, as an important strategic material for national development, became particularly scarce. Baosteel Group was called the product of China's reform and opening up, on December 23, 1978. On the second day of the closing of the third Plenary session of the 11th CPC Central Committee, the first pile was laid on the banks of the Yangtze River in Baoshan District, Shanghai, China. With the rapid growth of China's economic scale, China's iron and steel enterprises have also developed rapidly, regardless of the number of iron and steel enterprises. Or steel production, are advancing by leaps and bounds, gradually from the scarcity of products into overcapacity. Since 1996, the state has been restricting the steel industry from further blind expansion through relevant macroeconomic control policies, but the effect of the policy is not obvious, mainly because the market conditions to restrain the willingness of enterprises to expand have not been formed. It is not in line with the rapid development momentum in various regions. On the one hand, with the rapid development of the national economy and the pull of large-scale investment, the demand for steel has increased rapidly, driving the growth of steel production capacity; on the other hand, iron and steel enterprises still have the urge to increase production and expand their capacity even under the circumstances of small profits. Local governments in some ways, also contributed to the expansion of steel capacity. Recently, the State Council issued relevant guidance, the development of the steel industry to make further planning. From the beginning of reform and opening up to the present stage, government intervention has never stopped. This paper reviews and summarizes the influence of government intervention on the iron and steel industry in recent years, including the relevant theories of government intervention, from the point of view of market and system, taking the state investment in large iron and steel enterprises as the starting point. The influence of government intervention on the operation behavior of iron and steel enterprises, the influence of government intervention and enterprise performance, and the development of iron and steel enterprises with the development of national economy, and the analysis of the current state plan for the development strategy of iron and steel enterprises, This paper discusses the influence mechanism of administrative system on the strategy and behavior of iron and steel enterprises. This article mainly through the massive data analysis, the policy, the document contrast, the qualitative, the quantitative union analysis method, takes the iron and steel industry representative Baosteel as the main entry point, analyzes the government intervention time, the means, the effect and so on. This paper discusses the legitimacy of government intervention, expounds the market, the relationship between enterprises and government intervention and their mutual effects.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F426.31;D630

【参考文献】