资源型地区高碳产业绿色生产率研究

发布时间：2018-05-24 18:14

本文选题：绿色生产率 + 高碳产业　；参考：《环境科学与技术》2016年S2期

【摘要】：基于2003-2011年河北、内蒙古、陕西、山西、宁夏等5个资源型地区的煤炭采选业、黑色金属采选业、有色金属采选业、石油加工及炼焦业、医药制造业、黑色金属冶炼和压延业、有色金属冶炼和压延业、电力热力生产和供应业等8个高碳产业的投入产出数据,本文采用曼奎斯特-鲁恩博格生产率指数估算绿色生产率,并从济发展水平、结构性因素、制度因素以及市场因素等4个方面实证分析影响资源型地区高碳产业绿色生产率及其分解的具体因素,结果表明(1)不变价人均收入和GDP增长率显著促进绿色TFP、技术效率及技术进步的增长;(2)要素投入结构和工业产值占比对绿色TFP、技术效率及技术进步的影响为正,但是并非都在10%及以上的显著水平显著,同时国有企业比重绿色全要素生产率、技术进步具有显著的负面影响,而对技术效率影响不显著;(3)净出口占比对绿色TFP、技术效率及技术进步的显著影响为正,但是政府干预和财政分权不利于绿色TFP、技术效率及技术进步的增长;(4)能源价格显著促进技术效率、技术进步与绿色TFP增长,而物价变化对术效率、技术进步与绿色TFP增长的影响并不明显。
[Abstract]:Based on the five resource-based regions of Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Shanxi and Ningxia from 2003 to 2011, coal mining and separation, ferrous metal mining and separation, non-ferrous metal mining and separation, petroleum processing and coking, pharmaceutical manufacturing, ferrous metal smelting and calender, etc. The input-output data of eight high-carbon industries, such as non-ferrous metal smelting and calender industry, electric power thermal production and supply industry, are used in this paper to estimate green productivity using Manquist Luenberger productivity index, and from the level of economic development, structural factors, The paper empirically analyzes the specific factors that affect the green productivity and its decomposition of high-carbon industry in resource-based regions from four aspects: institutional factors and market factors. The results show that the constant price per capita income and GDP growth rate significantly promote green TFPs, and the technological efficiency and technological progress increase. 2) the input structure and industrial output value of the factors have a positive effect on the green TFPs, technological efficiency and technological progress. However, not all of them are significant at the level of 10% or more, and the proportion of state-owned enterprises to green total factor productivity and technological progress has a significant negative impact. However, the proportion of net exports to green TFPs, technological efficiency and technological progress is not significant. However, government intervention and fiscal decentralization are not conducive to green TFP.At the same time, technological efficiency and technological progress are increased. (4) Energy prices significantly promote technological efficiency, technological progress and green TFP growth, while price changes contribute to technological efficiency. The influence of technological progress and green TFP growth is not obvious.
【作者单位】：西北农林科技大学;
【基金】：2014年内蒙古自治区科技厅软科学研究计划项目:内蒙古自治区科技创新能力评价及科技资源优化配置策略研究 2013年高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题:民族地区加快转变经济发展方式与改善民生关系研究:以内蒙古为例(201315011120008) 内蒙古自治区自然基金博士项目:内蒙古企业雇主品牌体系建设研究阶段性成果(2014BS0705)
【分类号】：F224;F427

【相似文献】