侵犯信息网络传播权赔偿路径探究

发布时间：2018-01-20 03:43

本文关键词： 信息网络传播权法定赔偿权重系数　出处：《华侨大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：信息网络传播权是著作财产权的一种，网络技术打破了传统著作权制度的内在平衡，权利人难以控制其享有的信息网络传播权，纠纷也日益增多。现有的侵权损害赔偿的路径仅是有关法律规定，即受害人的实际损失、侵权人所得利益、法定赔偿额等三种计算方法，由于《信息网络传播条例》等相关著作权立法的局限性，在审判实践中暴露出了规则确定性较低、可预测性较差、经济效率较低等弊端，因此，为应对新技术发展，对侵犯信息网络传播权的赔偿制度必须具有新的思路和立法范式。本文从百度文库事件入手，利用经济学分析的利益平衡、帕累托最优等理论方法，通过借鉴国外有关理念，思考可行的对策。在通过剖析具体案例，，并对司法审判实践的考量因素如侵权作品的知名度、许可使用费、市场价值、侵权的主观过错、点播次数等一一予以分解后，重新整合，并创新地提出仿效刑事审判的量刑规范化，将法定赔偿规则与法官的自由裁量权灵活结合，并采用指标权重体系的数学工具，以公式化说理的方式来解决当前法定赔偿额的计算不公开、标准不统一、缺乏效率和没有弹性的瓶颈问题，希望能对有关立法部门建制网络侵权损害赔偿制度有所助益。最后，本文期待有关部门能够审慎制定平衡著作权权利保护和网络科技发展的法律规范，使制度具有可预期性，最大限度地防范侵权损害的发生。
[Abstract]:Information network communication right is a kind of property right of works. Network technology has broken the inherent balance of traditional copyright system, and the right owner can not control the information network communication right he enjoys. The existing path of tort compensation is only related to the law, namely the actual loss of the victim, the interests of the infringer, the legal compensation. Because of the limitation of the relevant copyright legislation, such as "Information Network Communication regulations", it has exposed some disadvantages in the trial practice, such as low certainty of rules, poor predictability, low economic efficiency and so on. In order to cope with the development of new technology, the compensation system for infringing the right of information network communication must have a new thinking and legislative paradigm. This paper starts with the Baidu Library incident and makes use of the benefit balance of economic analysis. Pareto optimal theory and methods, through the reference of foreign ideas, thinking of feasible countermeasures. Through the analysis of specific cases, and judicial practice considerations such as the popularity of infringing works, licensing fees. Market value, the subjective fault of infringement, the number of times on demand are decomposed one by one, and re-integrated, and innovatively proposed to follow the criminal trial of sentencing standardization. Combining the statutory compensation rules with the discretion of the judge, and adopting the mathematical tools of the index weight system to solve the current legal compensation calculation in the form of formulaic reasoning, the standard is not unified. Lack of efficiency and lack of flexibility of the bottleneck, I hope to be relevant to the relevant legislative branch of the system of tort damages in the legislative network to help. Finally. This paper expects relevant departments to carefully formulate legal norms to balance the protection of copyright rights with the development of network science and technology so as to make the system predictable and to prevent the occurrence of infringement damage to the maximum extent.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】