数字环境下私人复制行为研究

发布时间：2018-01-25 02:51

本文关键词： 数字环境私人复制合理使用版权补偿金　出处：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：版权制度的每一次进步及变革都与技术的进步不可分离,数字时代的来临,带来了私人复制属性的巨大改变。为私人使用而复制作品在传统版权法中是合理使用制度的经典模式。但因为现代复制技术的突飞猛进、复制成本的急剧降低及作品使用数量的急剧增加,版权人利益面临着私人复制给它带来的前所未有的威胁。随着数字时代的到来,私人复制问题是每个国家都无法回避的问题。私人复制行为在整个版权法中虽是一个比较微小的问题,但触及的却是著作权法的本源及核心价值,因此本文可以说是以小见大,对解决现实问题有一定的参考意义,希望对我国著作权法制的完善有一定的帮助。本文主要由四部分组成: 第一部分是私人复制行为的概述。本部分首先介绍了私人复制的概念,接着回顾了历史发展长河中私人复制的发展和变化:印刷版权时代的私人复制对整个版权体系的影响是微不足道的,也没有威胁到著作权人的利益,因此是合理的;电子版权时代的私人复制对著作权人的利益影响逐渐增大,天秤开始倾斜,因此此时的私人复制开始受到质疑,各国也开始做出相关的反应,如德国补偿金的出现;随着技术的进步,进入数字时代的私人复制不再理所当然属于合理使用范围,如何定性此时的私人复制及如何对其进行规制,是各国都要面临的一个迫于解决的问题。私人复制是否都属于合理使用呢?对于私人复制行为的性质认定有两大学说:侵权论和合理使用论。但两大学说都有所偏颇,值得进一步探讨。第二部分是有关私人复制行为性质判定的立法及局限。在回顾国际组织关于私人复制问题的立法及各国的努力的基础上了解到“三步检验法”和1976美国版权法规定的合理使用“四要素”是关于合理使用标准影响最大的参考因素,也是判断私人复制是否为合理使用的准则。其中合理使用“四要素”更被广泛采用。然而,合理使用四要素在数字环境下出现了一定的局限性。第三部分是数字环境下私人复制行为性质认定之标准构建。通过上文的分析,作者结合现实,提出了在数字环境下私人复制行为认定应持有的标准:首先,“利益平衡”是数字环境下认定私人复制性质的基本准则。其次,“合理使用四要素”是数字环境下认定私人复制的基本准则。最后,“传播”是数字环境下私人复制合法与否的参考因素。第四部分,是对我国《著作权法》的再分析及立法建议。首先指出相关立法的不足,然后,提出私人复制相关立法改进。
[Abstract]:Every progress and reform of copyright system cannot be separated from the progress of technology, and the digital age is coming. It has brought about a great change in the property of private reproduction. Copying works for private use is the classic mode of reasonable use in traditional copyright law. But because of the rapid development of modern reproduction technology. With the rapid reduction of reproduction costs and the sharp increase in the number of works used, the interests of copyright owners are facing an unprecedented threat to private reproduction. With the advent of the digital age. Private reproduction is an unavoidable problem in every country. Although private reproduction is a relatively minor problem in the whole copyright law, it touches on the origin and core value of copyright law. Therefore, this paper can be said to see the whole through a small part, which has certain reference significance to solve the practical problems, hoping to be helpful to the perfection of the copyright law system in our country. This article mainly consists of four parts: The first part is an overview of private replication. This part first introduces the concept of private replication. Then it reviews the development and changes of private reproduction in the long history: the impact of private reproduction in the printing copyright era on the whole copyright system is insignificant and does not threaten the interests of copyright owners. Therefore, it is reasonable; In the era of electronic copyright, the influence of private reproduction on the interests of copyright owners gradually increased, Libra began to tilt, so private copying began to be questioned at this time, and countries began to make relevant responses. Such as the appearance of German compensation; With the development of technology, private reproduction in the digital age is no longer a reasonable scope of use, how to characterize the private copy and how to regulate it. It is a problem that all countries have to deal with. Is private reproduction a reasonable use? As to the nature of private reproduction, there are two universities: tort theory and rational use theory, but the two theories are biased and worthy of further discussion. The second part deals with the legislation and limitations of the nature of private reproduction. On the basis of reviewing the legislation of international organizations on the issue of private reproduction and the efforts of States, it is understood that the "three-step test method" The rational use of the "four elements" under the copyright Law of the United States in 1976 and 1976 is the most important reference factor for the rational use of standards. It is also the criterion to judge whether private reproduction is reasonable use. The "four elements" are more widely used. However, the reasonable use of the four elements has some limitations in the digital environment. The third part is the standard construction of the nature of private reproduction in digital environment. Through the analysis above, the author puts forward the standards that should be held in the recognition of private reproduction in the digital environment: first of all. "balance of interests" is the basic criterion of determining the nature of private reproduction in digital environment. Secondly, "rational use of four elements" is the basic criterion of determining private reproduction in digital environment. "Communication" is a reference factor for the legality of private reproduction in the digital environment. Part 4th is the reanalysis and legislative suggestion of copyright Law of our country. Firstly, it points out the deficiency of the relevant legislation, and then puts forward the improvement of the relevant legislation of private reproduction.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】