网络著作权民事侵权案件管辖权确定研究

发布时间：2018-02-08 14:40

本文关键词： 网络著作权侵权管辖权博客　出处：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：滕州一作者郑先生的博客文章在网站上未经授权,被网站或他人使用侵犯其信息网络传播权、署名权、保护作品完整权、获得报酬权一案,在2011年成为了社会关注的焦点。笔者作为维权律师代理该案,在办理的过程中,感慨颇深,取证难,寻找侵权主体难,立案难等等之难。分析其根本原因,是网络著作权管辖权的规定及理论存在问题所致。鉴于此,本文围绕越来越来越多网络侵权纠纷,特别是网络著作权侵权诉讼中的一个基本问题——管辖权,进行了分析。管辖权的确定是侵权诉讼程序的前提和基础,对于网络侵权案件的管辖权问题,我国在这方面的理论研究不深入成熟,目前尚未达成有相对统一意见的管辖权原则。本文从网络著作权的侵权行为入手,结合我国网络环境下著作权侵权现有的法律保护规定,运用案例分析方法,分析网络著作权在法律保护方面存在的问题,最终得出可以将原告所在地作为网络著作权案件的管辖地优先适用的结论。全文除了引言和结语外,共分为六部分。第一部分笔者通过自己办理网络侵权案例,体会到网络著作权维权之难,很大程度上是因为管辖权方面的立法不完善,引起了笔者对有关著作权及管辖权问题的一些思考。第二部分分析我国目前有关网络著作权侵权方面的法律规定,共分四节。第一节论述网络著作权侵权的概念；第二节阐释网络著作权侵权人的认定问题；第三节分析了网络著作权侵权行为常见的几种形式。第四节指出我国出台的网络环境下著作权侵权法律规定的问题。第三部分讲述我国关于网络著作权侵权案件的司法管辖问题。从司法管辖的含义谈到我国对网络著作权管辖的规定,继而指出我国网络著作权管辖存在的问题。第四部分是国外对网络著作权侵权案件司法管辖的法律规定。有关网络著作权管辖权早已引起了发达国家的关注和重视,并形成了比较成熟完善的网络著作权管辖权的规定。该部分主要就美国、欧洲、加拿大等国家有关管辖权的相关法律规定作出了归纳和分析。第五部分对确定管辖权的新主权理论、管辖相对论等几种主流理论进行了分析。第六部分是本文的重点章节。该部分主要阐述我国在网络侵权案件管辖权上存在的问题,并在借鉴外国这此问题的立法经验基础上,对我国的网络著作权管辖问题提出笔者的一些立法思考。首先,可以将原告所在地作为网络著作权侵权案件管辖地优先适用,此节分三点具体阐述了适用该原则的原因依据；同时,为了防止原告适用上述原则滥诉,可以辅以适用“不方便法院”原则；其次,传统的侵权行为实施地仍是管辖地确定的一般原则；最后,笔者要强调的是并不能放弃被告住所地法院管辖,但要稍作补充。
[Abstract]:An author of Tengzhou, Mr. Zheng, whose blog article is unauthorized on the website, was used by the website or others to infringe on his right to network dissemination of information, to be signed, to protect the integrity of the work, and to be paid. In 2011, I became the focus of social attention. In the process of handling the case, the author, as a rights lawyer, had deep feelings, difficulty in obtaining evidence, difficulty in finding the main body of infringement, difficulty in filing a case, and so on. In view of this, this article revolves around more and more network infringement disputes, especially one of the basic problems in the network copyright infringement litigation-jurisdiction. The determination of jurisdiction is the premise and foundation of tort proceedings. For the jurisdiction of network tort cases, the theoretical research in this respect is not mature in our country. At present, the principle of jurisdiction with relatively uniform opinions has not been reached. This paper begins with the infringement of network copyright and combines the existing legal protection provisions of copyright infringement under the network environment in our country, and applies the case analysis method. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the legal protection of network copyright and finally draws the conclusion that the plaintiff's location can be used as the jurisdiction of the network copyright case first. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into six parts. The first part of the author through their own network infringement cases, to understand the network copyright rights protection difficulties, to a large extent, because of the jurisdiction of the legislation is not perfect, The second part analyzes the current legal provisions of network copyright infringement in China, which is divided into four sections. The first section discusses the concept of network copyright infringement; The second section explains the identification of network copyright infringer; Section three analyzes several common forms of network copyright infringement. Section 4th points out the problems of copyright infringement laws and regulations issued by our country under the network environment. The third part talks about the network copyright infringement cases in our country. From the meaning of judicial jurisdiction to our country's regulations on the jurisdiction of network copyright, Then it points out the problems existing in the jurisdiction of network copyright in our country. Part 4th is the legal regulation of judicial jurisdiction of network copyright infringement cases in foreign countries. The jurisdiction of network copyright has already attracted the attention and attention of developed countries. And has formed relatively mature and perfect regulations of network copyright jurisdiction. This part mainly concerns the United States, Europe, The relevant laws and regulations on jurisdiction in Canada and other countries have been summarized and analyzed. Part 5th gives a new sovereignty theory for the determination of jurisdiction. Part 6th is the key chapter of this paper. This part mainly expounds the problems existing in the jurisdiction of network infringement cases in China, and on the basis of drawing on the legislative experience of foreign countries on this issue. The author puts forward some legislative thoughts on the jurisdiction of network copyright in our country. Firstly, the plaintiff's location can be used as the jurisdiction place of network copyright infringement cases in priority. This section elaborates the reasons for the application of this principle in three aspects. At the same time, in order to prevent the plaintiff from overapplying the above principles, the principle of "inconvenient courts" can be applied; secondly, the traditional place of tort is still the general principle determined by the jurisdiction; finally, The author emphasizes that the court jurisdiction of the defendant's domicile should not be waived, but should be supplemented.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】