著作权质押研究

发布时间：2018-02-08 16:03

本文关键词： 著作权质押公示模式制度构想　出处：《中南民族大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：著作权质押是著作权利用制度的一个重要方面。伴随着知识经济的到来,知识产权在我国日益得到重视。因为较之以往社会财富的表现形式发生了很大的变化,财富的表现形式不仅是土地、房产、资源和不动产等有形资产,而且包括专利、商标、商誉、著作权等知识产权在内的无形资产。特别是对一些高新科技类的中小企业来说,新型财富的意义甚是重大,因为它们的财产更多地是知识产权等无形资产。这些企业要发展就必须通过一定的方式来进行融资,著作权等相关知识产权质押就为这些企业提供了崭新的融资渠道。第一,本文分析了著作权质押的概念与特征。本文从著作权质押的最一般理论着手,通过对比动产质押的概念,深入剖析著作权质押的基础理论,并且结合了《物权法》的最新规定。然而,2007年《物权法》在知识产权质押方面的规定并没有在很大程度上突破原《担保法》的局限,在对知识产权质押的问题上的规定仍然是较为粗略和概括的,没有对知识产权质押的效力的内容、知识产权质押的公示、担保权益的实现、知识产权设定质押后使用费的提存机关等细节问题做出详细的回答。第二,讨论了著作权质押所存在的问题。2007年《物权法》与《著作权法》等知识产权法及其实施细则之间存在一些衔接上的问题。如,我国《物权法》明确规定了用作质押的知识产权必须是“可以转让的”,而著作权许可使用权是否可以质押并不明确,《著作权法》规定了著作权人转让著作权和许可使用该权利的情形。但是同样的,这种按第24条产生的许可使用权是否属于《物权法》第223条规定的“可以转让的权利”是不清楚的。《著作权法实施细则》第25条规定著作权的转让和许可“可以”在管理部门进行登记。然而,在《著作权法实施细则》中并无著作权质押或者著作权许可使用权质押的规定。根据《物权法》第223条规定著作权的质押只有在登记后方得生效。第三,现有研究缺乏理论深度,只是局限在著作权质押制度的表面问题的一些探讨。如对几种特殊质押标的的探讨,涉及到未完成作品能否质押以及存在哪些制度上的缺失,这些问题都是在本文讨论范围之列。此外,尚有一些重要问题仍在讨论之列,如著作权质权制度的价值追求与平衡问题等。第四,指出著作权质押的现状及不足并提出粗浅的制度构想。本文正是试图克服实践及学界中出现的不足,最后寻找到完善我国著作权质押制度的出路,充分体现著作权质押制度的价值所在,并提出立法建议供有关部门参考。
[Abstract]:The pledge of copyright is an important aspect of the copyright utilization system. With the coming of knowledge economy, intellectual property has been paid more and more attention in our country. The forms of wealth are not only tangible assets such as land, real estate, resources and real estate, but also intangible assets, such as patents, trademarks, goodwill, copyrights, etc., especially for some small and medium-sized high-tech enterprises. New types of wealth are of great significance because their assets are more intangible assets, such as intellectual property rights. If these enterprises are to develop, they have to finance them in a certain way. Copyright and other related intellectual property pledge for these enterprises to provide a new financing channel. First, this paper analyzes the concept and characteristics of copyright pledge. From the most general theory of copyright pledge, this paper analyzes the basic theory of copyright pledge by comparing the concept of chattel pledge. And combined with the latest provisions of the property Law. However, in 2007, the provisions of the Law on property Rights on the pledge of intellectual property did not to a large extent break through the limitations of the original "Guaranty Law". The provisions on the issue of intellectual property pledge are still relatively rough and general. There is no content of the validity of the pledge of intellectual property, the publicity of the pledge of intellectual property, the realization of the security interest, Set the intellectual property rights to pledge the deposit of royalties and other details of the organization to make a detailed answer. Secondly, the problems of copyright pledge are discussed. In 2007, there are some problems in connection between the intellectual property Law and copyright Law, and the detailed rules of its implementation. For example, The property Law of our country clearly stipulates that the intellectual property rights used as pledge must be "transferable", but it is not clear whether the right to use the copyright license can be pledged. The copyright Law stipulates that the copyright owner transfers the copyright and permits the transfer of the copyright. Where this right can be used. But again, It is not clear whether this right of use granted under Article 24 is "transferable" under Article 223 of the Law on property. Article 25 of the implementing rules of the copyright Law provides that "the transfer and licensing of copyright" may. "to register with management... however, There is no provision for the pledge of copyright or the right to use copyright license in the detailed rules for the implementation of the copyright Law. According to Article 223 of the Law on property Rights, the pledge of copyright shall only take effect after registration. Third, the existing research lacks theoretical depth, but it is limited to some superficial problems of copyright pledge system. For example, the discussion of several special pledge objects involves whether the work can be pledged or not and what system is missing. In addition, some important issues are still under discussion, such as the value pursuit and balance of copyright pledge system. In 4th, the author points out the present situation and deficiency of copyright pledge and puts forward a superficial institutional conception. This paper tries to overcome the shortcomings in practice and academic circles, and finally finds a way out to perfect the copyright pledge system in China. Fully reflect the value of copyright pledge system, and put forward legislative suggestions for the relevant departments for reference.
【学位授予单位】：中南民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】