《满洲评论》及其时代

发布时间：2018-03-19 19:29

本文选题：伪满洲国　切入点：日文报刊　出处：《东北师范大学》2012年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《满洲评论》是在伪满洲国活跃的日本文人们所创办的时事评论周刊。1931年8月15日于大连创刊，正值九一八事变勃发前夕；于1945年7月7日正式停刊，翌月日本宣布无条件投降。从时期上而言，几乎横亘伪满洲国的成立至灭亡的14年历史。《满洲评论》共刊行29卷总676期，每半年刊行合集为1卷。1979年至1981年间，前28卷经东京龙溪书舍整理翻印出版，作为珍贵文献在日本伪满学术界受到重视。《满洲评论》长期以来受到中日两国学界的关注，且不仅局限于伪满洲国问题研究领域，由于其史料价值意义重大，近年来更是逐渐受到来自东亚近代史、殖民地文学、移民问题及思想史研究等诸多学科领域的关注。但对《满洲评论》本身进行深度挖掘与系统研究的工作，尚不够完善。时至今日，伴随着中日两国伪满洲国研究逐渐走向成熟，相关研究资料日益充实，学术研究氛围逐步自由开放，对《满洲评论》做出全面研究的外在环境以及内部理由已经形成。《满洲评论》14年的整理与分析工作变得十分必要。论文首先着眼《满洲评论》创刊经历，论述了刊物两大灵魂人物橘朴与小山贞知的生平和刊物之间的密切关联，从殖民文化移植的角度，求证了刊物诞生初期的思想源泉。其次，，以《满洲评论》的自身构成为核心，通过对时事评论栏目的分期研究，考证了刊物编撰人员的变迁历程，梳理了杂志在各时期的关注重点与主张。同时对刊物特辑进行了总体的归类、整理和分析研究，并附有《满洲评论》大事纪年及与之关联的伪满大事纪，以用作全篇论文的比照。除了作为刊物主体部分的时事评论之外，构成《满洲评论》的多元化要素同样极其重要。如佐藤大四郎主导的中国东北农村问题研究、山口慎一负责的文学专栏以及小山贞知一手操纵下的相关满洲青年联盟与协和会的报道等，均是刊物中不可分割的有机组成。最后一章，是将视线从《满洲评论》这一主体延伸开来，从周边研究来侧面评定该刊的价值与意义。首先是将中日两国学者的既有成果进行了梳理和总结，特别是对其中的不确切和不翔实的地方进行了考察与深入研究。其次谈到的是，围绕《满洲评论》翻印而引发的、在日本学术界知名的“龙溪书舍事件”，该刊的翻印经过跌宕起伏，绝不逊色于其创刊历程，同样使人饶有兴味。满洲评论社将刊物上登载过的重要文章进行整理出版，形成了《满洲评论丛书》，对这些出版物的发掘与研究，是考察《满洲评论》思想史的重要方面。本论文中对《满洲评论》本身及其周边所作出的研究，仅是挖掘了该刊及其时代中社会生活的一角，尚不敢妄称成熟的研究成果。但其中对《满洲评论》的拆解与归类整理方式，较之传统意义有了一定程度的突破；同时关注刊物中殖民与军国主义、马克思主义倾向两种力量的抗衡，并科学合理地将其进行区分对待；对满洲青年联盟和协和会与刊物之间的关联、刊物中的文学要素和移民问题报道等方面的整理与研究，为国内相关领域提供了补充；特别是对《满洲评论》特辑与单行本的挖掘、佐藤大四郎与中国东北农村运动的考察以及“龙溪书舍事件”的叙述，都是目前国内相关研究领域尚未完整开掘的部分。从充实伪满文献资源、丰富伪满报刊研究等意义上，希望能够贡献一份力量。《满洲评论》的相关研究，仅只是一个开始。相信中日两国学界对《满洲评论》的研究，在不久的将来必定兴盛。
[Abstract]:< > in the Manchuria review is the puppet Manchuria government active Japanese people founded the weekly commentary.1931 years of its founding in Dalian in August 15th, 918 when the incident arose on the eve of the official publication; in July 7, 1945, the month following Japan's unconditional surrender. From the perspective of the period, almost through the establishment of cross puppet Manchuria perish 14 years of history. The Manchuria review is published in 29 volumes total > 676, every six months for publication Collection Volume 1.1979 to 1981 years, the first 28 volumes by the Tokyo Longxi Shushe finishing as a precious literature reprint published in Japan, the academic attention.
< > Manchuria review has long been the concern of scholars in China and Japan, and is not limited to the issue in the research field of the puppet Manchuria government, due to its historical value is significant, especially in recent years gradually from East Asian history, colonial literature, immigration and history research concerned many fields. But the depth of excavation and the system research to the Manchuria review work < > itself, is still not perfect. Today, with the Japanese puppet regime in Manchuria to study gradually mature, the related research data is full, free and open academic atmosphere gradually, make a comprehensive research on "Manchuria Review > external environment and internal reasons have been formed collation and analysis work. The Manchuria review >14 is very necessary.
The author reviews published < Manchuria > experience, discusses the close relationship between the two publications the soul Orange Park and Koyama Zhenchi's life and publications, from the colonial culture transplant angle, the confirmation of the source of the birth of the early publications. Secondly, in "Manchuria Review > itself as the core, through the research on the current stage review column, textual changes in the course of publication compiling staff, combing the magazine in the focus and ideas in each period. At the same time of publication special for the overall classification, collation and analysis of the study, with the Manchuria review event calendar > < and associated with the events, this paper used to contrast.
In addition to being the main part of the publication commentary, constitute elements of Manchuria > < diversified comments also is extremely important. Such as the study of Chinese northeast rural problems led by Misaki Sato Oshiro, Yamaguchi Shinichi responsible for the literary column and Koyama Zhenchi Manchuria operate a Youth League and the Union will report, are part of the organic the publication.
The last chapter is to extend the attention away from "the Manchuria Review > this subject, from the side to the surrounding research value and significance of the journal evaluation. The first is the Chinese and Japanese scholars both achievements and summarizes, especially for the exact and detailed local and deeply talking about the research. Secondly, on < Manchuria comments triggered > reprint, in the academic circles in Japan known as the" Longxi sanctum event ", the Journal of the reproduced through ups and downs, not inferior to its founding history, also make people interesting. Manchuria review press will be important articles in journals published. Published, form a review of < Manchuria >, explore and Research on these publications, is an important aspect of" Manchuria Review > in the history of thought.
The research of < Manchuria > comments made by itself and its surrounding, is only a corner of the social life of the Mining Journal and its era, still can't take mature research results. But the "Manchuria Review > dismantling and classification, the traditional has a certain degree of breakthrough; at the same time attention and publications in colonial military doctrine, the Marx doctrine tendency of the two force to contend, and reasonably the distinction; the association between the Manchuria Youth League and association with the publications, collation and research of literary elements and immigration reports and other aspects of the publication, which serves as a supplement to domestic field; especially mining of < Manchuria Review > features and booklet, and China inspects Misaki Sato Oshiro northeast rural sports and the" narrative Longxi sanctum event ", is the current domestic research field No complete digging part. From the literature to enrich the rich resources, the newspaper research significance, hoping to contribute to a force.
The related research in the Manchuria review is only a beginning. It is believed that the study of the Sino Japanese academic circles on the Manchuria review will be prosperous in the near future.

【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G239.29;K26

【参考文献】