我国数据库知识产权保护新探

发布时间：2018-03-24 23:34

本文选题：数据库　切入点：原创性数据库　出处：《浙江工商大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,数据库产业因其具有巨大的投资和经济价值,已经成为经济社会中的一个重要产业。数据库作为人类智力创造的成果,需要巨大的制作投入,具有巨大的经济价值,却极容易被复制,被大量的非法使用。但是我国对数据库并没有提供专门的法律给予保护,在世界范围内,对数据库的法律保护也没有形成统一的标准。因此如何解决数据库的法律保护问题已成为国内外法律界关注的焦点之一。数据库有两大基本类型：一是数据或其他材料的选择、编排具有原创性,我们把它叫做原创性数据库。二是数据或其他材料的选择、编排不具有原创性,但有实质性投入的,我们把它叫做非原创性数据库。本文以原创性数据库与非原创性数据库为路径,分别对两者保护的有关问题进行分析,比较研究,探寻在我国建立行之有效的数据库知识产权保护体系的方法。本文首先对数据库概念、特征进行法律界定,并基于洛克的财产权理论和休谟的实用主义财产说对数据库法律保护的必要性进行了阐述。然后从总体上简要介绍世界范围内对数据库法律保护的各种模式以及我国对数据库保护的现状。进而分别对原创性数据库和非原创性数据库保护展开分析论证。对由著作权保护的原创性数据库,主要针对理论上存在争议,实践中又很难判断的独创性标准问题运用案例分析法和比较分析法进行分析。对非原创性数据库,本文分别考查美国不正当竞争法,欧盟《数据库法律保护指令》对非原创性数据库的特别权利保护内容以及德国《著作权法》对非原创性数据库的邻接权保护的内容。运用比较分析法,提出邻接权保护非独创性数据库比特别权利保护更适合,而不正当竞争法可作为法律最后的一个兜底保护手段。最后提出如何构建我国数据库知识产权保护体系,提出具体的立法修改内容。建议借鉴德国的著作权法,形成著作权法统一下的数据库双轨保护体系,即著作权法保护原创性数据库,邻接权保护非原创性数据库,不正当竞争法兜底保护。
[Abstract]:In recent years, because of its huge investment and economic value, database industry has become an important industry in economic society. As a result of human intelligence creation, database industry needs huge production investment and has great economic value. But our country does not provide special laws to protect the database, in the world, The legal protection of database has not formed a unified standard, so how to solve the problem of legal protection of database has become one of the focuses of domestic and foreign legal circles. There are two basic types of database: one is the choice of data or other materials, the arrangement is original, we call it the original database, the other is the choice of data or other materials, the arrangement is not original, but it has substantial input. We call it the non-original database. This paper takes the original database and the non-original database as the path to analyze and compare the protection of the two databases. This paper explores the methods of establishing an effective database intellectual property protection system in China. First of all, this paper defines the concept and characteristics of database by law. Based on Locke's theory of property right and Hume's theory of practical property, this paper expounds the necessity of the legal protection of database. The current situation of database protection in our country. Then the analysis and argumentation of original database and non-original database protection are carried out respectively. Case analysis and comparative analysis are used to analyze the originality standard, which is controversial in theory and difficult to judge in practice. For the non-original database, this paper examines the unfair competition law in the United States. The European Union's Directive on the legal Protection of databases, the contents of special rights protection for non-original databases, and the contents of the German copyright Law for the protection of neighboring rights of non-original databases. It is put forward that the non-original database of neighboring right protection is more suitable than special right protection, and unfair competition law can be used as the last protection means of law. Finally, the author puts forward how to construct the intellectual property protection system of database in China. It is suggested that the dual system of database protection under the unification of copyright law should be formed, that is, copyright law protects originality database, neighbor right protection non-originality database, Unfair competition law is protected.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】