视频聚合平台的著作权侵权认定研究

发布时间：2018-03-29 11:20

本文选题：视频聚合平台　切入点：深度链接　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,视频聚合平台悄然兴起,其提供的"一站式"观看服务给用户带来了极大的便利。然而视频聚合平台采用的深度链接技术却饱受争议。学术界对深度链接技术的侵权问题形成了服务器标准与用户感知标准两种截然不同的观点。司法实务中,法院采取的认定标准不同,造成了法律适用混乱的局面。究其原因,主要在于各方对信息网络传播权中"提供作品"行为的理解不同。本文在对视频聚合平台模式进行法律剖析的同时,通过对比司法实践中采用不同认定标准的法院判决,分析现行两种认定标准的利弊之处,继而主张采用实质呈现标准对视频聚合平台的深度链接行为进行认定。实质呈现标准相较于现行两种认定标准更有利于平衡各方利益,不仅能够有效保护被链视频网站利益而且不会阻碍视频聚合平台的健康发展。本文分为三部分:第一部分对视频聚合平台的模式进行剖析,从行为主体、行为方式、行为对象的角度分析其法律性质,为侵权认定标准探讨奠定基础,提出视频聚合平台的深度链接行为所引发的法律问题。第二部分围绕侵权认定标准展开讨论,结合司法实务中的具体案例分析服务器标准、用户感知标准、有效技术措施和反不正当竞争法在著作权侵权认定上各自的不足之处。第三部分对信息网络传播权中"提供作品"行为进行再理解,主张采用"实质呈现标准"认定该行为是否侵权更为合理。该部分采用著作权创设目的和利益平衡两种角度对实质呈现标准的合理性进行论述,建议在司法层面上由最高人民法院出台司法解释,发布指导性案例,并在立法层面上拓宽信息网络传播权,使之涵盖视频聚合平台的深度链接行为。
[Abstract]:In recent years, video aggregation platforms have emerged quietly. Its "one-stop" viewing service has brought great convenience to users. However, the deep link technology used in video aggregation platform has been controversial. The infringement of deep link technology in academic circles has formed a server mark. In judicial practice, The different standards adopted by the court resulted in confusion in the application of the law. The main reason lies in the different understanding of the behavior of "providing works" in the right of information network communication. This paper analyzes the mode of video aggregation platform and makes a contrast between the court decisions of different standards in judicial practice. This paper analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two existing standards, and then proposes to use the substantive presentation standard to identify the deep link behavior of the video aggregation platform. Compared with the current two standards, the substantive presentation standard is more conducive to balancing the interests of all parties. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part analyzes the mode of video aggregation platform, from the behavior subject, the behavior way, From the point of view of the object, the author analyzes its legal nature, lays a foundation for the discussion of the standard of tort determination, and puts forward the legal problems caused by the deep-link behavior of the video aggregation platform. Combining with the concrete cases in the judicial practice, the server standard, the user perception standard, Effective technical measures and anti-unfair competition law in the copyright infringement of their respective shortcomings. The third part of the information network dissemination of the right to "provide works" behavior re-understanding, The author advocates that it is more reasonable to use the "substantial presentation standard" to determine whether the act is infringing or not. This part discusses the rationality of the substantive presentation standard from two angles: the purpose of copyright creation and the balance of interests. It is suggested that the Supreme people's Court should issue judicial interpretation, issue instructive cases, and broaden the right of information network dissemination at the legislative level to cover the deep link behavior of video aggregation platform.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】