论作品临时复制的法律规制

发布时间：2018-04-17 02:13

本文选题：复制 + 临时复制　；参考：《河北经贸大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：复制权是著作权的一项最基本权利。一直以来,著作权人对于其作品的利用几乎都是建立在对复制权的控制之上的,但是随着数字技术和网络技术的发展,临时复制权是否应归版权人所有,临时复制权是否能被传统复制权所包括,这些问题是学者争论最为激烈的问题。由于关于临时复制没有形成统一的定论,有关临时复制的争论持续达十几年。笔者通过对理论和司法实践的探讨,对临时复制提出自己的看法。本文共分四章,主要内容如下：第一章主要考察临时复制和复制的内涵及特征。复制就是通过各种方式制作与原作品相同的作品的行为,具有作品再现性、载体的有形性及存在方式的固定性的特性。临时复制虽然具有自己的特性,即主体的不特定性、复制的不完整性及复制的自动性三性。但是复制与临时复制的区别只是量上的区别,不存在质上的区别。第二章从理论和司法实践双方面进行审视与考察,首先从中国的理论界对临时复制正反的观点进行了深入的探讨,最终认为临时复制应当纳入到复制权中；除了理论探讨外,还对司法实践进行了考察,虽然在理论上对临时复制的争论比较大,但是,在司法实践中大都认为临时复制应归于复制制度中,美国1999年的Intellectual Reserve, inc. v.UtahLighthouse Ministry, Inc.案,早己对临时复制进行了确认。我国2009年5月腾讯诉王金友案,也间接地对临时复制进行确认。第三章主要考察国际条约和最主要国家关于临时复制的规定。《伯尔尼公约》最先明确了不论以任何方式和采取任何形式复制都属于复制的范围。《世界知识产权组织版权条约》和《世界知识产权组织表演和录音制品条约》虽然在最后的条文中,没有将临时复制加进去,但是,临时复制是复制的一种,这是复制权发展的趋势。国外立法中,美国、欧盟、澳大利亚和加拿大等国都在立法中认定临时复制是复制的一种,日本虽然在立法上不承认临时复制归入到复制制度中去,但是,“一时的储积”的规则已经成为重要的研究课题了。第四章最后对临时复制的立法提出自己的建议。首先在《计算机软件保护条例》和《信息网络传播权保护条例》中明确定位,将临时复制这一概念引入到两个条例当中去,然后适时修改著作权法。在确立了临时复制制度之后,要建立默示许可制度和侵权赔偿制度,并对原有的合理使用制度进行修改,保障临时复制制度的实施。
[Abstract]:The right to copy is one of the most basic rights of copyright.All along, the copyright owner's use of his works is almost based on the control of the right to copy. But with the development of digital technology and network technology, whether the temporary right of reproduction should be owned by the copyright owner,Whether the temporary replication right can be included in the traditional reproduction right is the most controversial issue among scholars.Since there is no uniform conclusion about temporary replication, the debate about temporary replication has lasted for more than a decade.Through the discussion of theory and judicial practice, the author puts forward his own views on temporary reproduction.This paper is divided into four chapters, the main contents are as follows:The first chapter mainly examines the connotation and characteristics of temporary replication and replication.Reproduction is the behavior of making the same work as the original work in various ways. It has the characteristics of reproduction of the work, tangible of the carrier and fixed of the mode of existence.Although temporary replication has its own characteristics, that is, the subjectivity, the incompleteness of replication and the automatization of replication.But the difference between replication and temporary replication is only quantitative, not qualitative.The second chapter examines and inspects from both theory and judicial practice. First of all, it makes a thorough discussion on the positive and negative views of temporary replication from the theoretical circle of China, and finally concludes that temporary replication should be included in the right of replication.The author also investigates the judicial practice. Although there is a great debate on temporary replication in theory, it is generally believed in judicial practice that temporary replication should be attributed to the replication system. The United States in 1999, Intellectual Reserve, inc. v.UtahLighthouse Ministry, Inc.In this case, the provisional copy has been confirmed.In May 2009, Tencent v. Wang Jinyou case, also indirectly confirmed the provisional copy.Chapter III focuses on international treaties and the provisions of the most important countries on interim reproduction. The Berne Convention first made it clear that reproduction falls within the scope of reproduction by any means and in any form. < World intellectual property OrganizationThe Weaving copyright Treaty and the WIPO Treaty on performances and Phonograms, although in the final articles,Temporary replication is not added, but temporary replication is a kind of replication, which is the trend of replication rights.In foreign legislation, the United States, the European Union, Australia, Canada and other countries have all recognized in their legislation that temporary replication is a kind of reproduction. Although Japan does not recognize temporary duplication as part of the reproduction system in legislation, however,The rule of "temporary storage" has become an important research topic.Chapter four puts forward some suggestions on the legislation of temporary copy.Firstly, in the computer Software Protection regulations and the Information Network Transmission right Protection regulations, the concept of temporary copy is introduced into the two regulations, and then the copyright Law is amended in due course.After establishing the temporary copy system, the implied license system and tort compensation system should be established, and the original reasonable use system should be modified to ensure the implementation of the temporary copy system.
【学位授予单位】：河北经贸大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】