当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 出版论文 >

网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任制度研究

发布时间:2018-04-18 13:55

  本文选题:网络 + 著作权侵权 ; 参考:《河南师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:互联网技术的高速发展,网络已经融入到我们的生活中,在为我们的生活带来许多便利,同时网络侵权行为所带来的问题也日益严重。尤其是作品的传播,其方式从传统纸质版扩展到现代网络版,其途径由网络服务提供者直接通过网络平台媒介以求实现,这一形式的转变不仅使文化传播更加广泛,而且也使著作权保护这个问题从现实走向了虚拟。随之而来,网络著作权侵权的案件也层出不穷,加之网络环境的一系列特点例如虚拟性、隐蔽性、传播快和覆盖广等,也使网络著作权的保护问题愈来愈变得更为棘手。网络服务提供者,主体广泛,责任认定困难,针对这方面的法律法规也亟待完善。因此,当网络著作权侵权案件出现时,网络服务提供者往往成为众矢之的。网络服务提供者在网络著作权侵权案件中是否应该承担责任、应当承担什么样的责任、处罚的力度应在何种程度比较合适等等,这些问题在司法界和实务界一直存有争议。为此,我国立法及司法也给于了极大的关注,出台了一系列的法律予以规范,但是法律总是有滞后性的,不断地研究此类问题具有重要的现实意义。本文主要采用举例子、比较分析等方法,从从四方面阐述了网络服务提供者的著作权侵权问题,主要内容是网络服务提供者的概念分类、网络服务提供者著作权侵权行为形式以及网络服务提供者应当承担责任的理论依据,明确了网络服务提供者承担侵权责任的原理,结合我国的现实情况以及例如百度文库侵权案等案件入手,归责原则、间接侵权行为、主观过错和赔偿性制度作为切入点,指出我国网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任制度的不足,结合国外的先进国家的法律,例如美国的《数字千年立法》、德国的《信息和通讯服务法》等,同时思考我国的现有法律,分析出优点和不足,以此得出相关的启示,经过论述以及结合国外的先进法律,分析思考我国的不足之处,从归责原则、间接侵权行为、主观过错和赔偿性制度四方面,浅谈怎样完善我国的立法提出粗浅的意见和建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of Internet technology, the network has been integrated into our life, which brings us a lot of convenience. At the same time, the problems caused by network infringement are becoming more and more serious.In particular, the dissemination of works is extended from the traditional paper version to the modern online version, and its way is realized by the network service providers directly through the network platform media. This form of transformation not only makes the spread of culture more extensive,It also makes the problem of copyright protection from reality to fictitious.Subsequently, the network copyright infringement cases also emerge in endlessly, in addition to a series of characteristics of the network environment, such as virtual, hidden, fast transmission and wide coverage, also makes the network copyright protection more and more difficult.The network service provider, the main body is extensive, the responsibility is difficult, the law and regulations in this respect also need to be perfected urgently.Therefore, when network copyright infringement cases appear, network service providers often become the target.Whether the network service provider should bear the responsibility in the network copyright infringement case, what kind of responsibility should bear, what degree of punishment should be appropriate and so on, these questions have been disputed in the judicial and the practical field.Therefore, the legislation and judicature of our country have been paid great attention to, and a series of laws have been issued to regulate them, but the law is always lagging behind, so it is of great practical significance to study this kind of problem constantly.This paper mainly introduces the copyright infringement problem of network service provider from four aspects by using examples, comparative analysis and other methods. The main content is the concept classification of network service provider.The form of copyright infringement by network service provider and the theoretical basis that network service provider should bear liability, which make clear the principle of network service provider to bear tort liability.Starting with the reality of our country and cases such as Baidu Library infringement case, the principle of imputation, indirect tort, subjective fault and compensatory system are taken as the entry point.This paper points out the deficiency of copyright tort liability system of network service provider in our country, combines the laws of advanced countries abroad, such as the Digital Millennium legislation of the United States and the Information and Communication Service Law of Germany, and so on. At the same time, it also considers the existing laws of our country.By analyzing the advantages and disadvantages, we can draw the relevant enlightenment. After discussing and combining the advanced laws of foreign countries, we analyze and think about the shortcomings of our country, from the four aspects of imputation principle, indirect tort, subjective fault and compensatory system.A brief talk on how to perfect the legislation of our country and put forward some superficial opinions and suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:河南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王军权;;网络话语权的规制模式研究[J];法律适用;2015年02期

2 徐伟;;网络侵权治理中通知移除制度的局限性及其破解[J];法学;2015年01期

3 韩赤风;;互联网服务提供者的义务与责任——以《德国电信媒体法》为视角[J];法学杂志;2014年10期

4 王英;;网络服务提供者责任限制制度的国际观察[J];图书馆建设;2014年06期

5 罗莉;;论惩罚性赔偿在知识产权法中的引进及实施[J];法学;2014年04期

6 徐伟;;网络服务提供者“知道”认定新诠——兼驳网络服务提供者“应知”论[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2014年02期

7 鲁甜;;互联网开放平台服务提供商的侵权责任认定研究[J];中南财经政法大学研究生学报;2013年06期

8 王艳芳;;《关于审理侵害信息网络传播权民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》的理解与适用[J];人民司法;2013年09期

9 孟传香;;关于网络服务提供者不作为刑事责任问题的探讨[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期

10 鲁春雅;;论网络服务提供者的侵权责任[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2012年05期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 林可挺;论网络服务提供者侵权行为认定及责任承担[D];华东政法大学;2012年

2 王鑫;网络服务提供者不作为侵权行为研究[D];复旦大学;2012年

3 钱腾飞;网络服务提供者侵权责任研究[D];广东商学院;2011年



本文编号:1768643

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/1768643.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f46c4***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com