冒名行为民事责任研究

发布时间：2018-05-27 08:15

本文选题：冒名行为 + 署名权　；参考：《西南政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 在现实生活中,有一种与盗版侵权同样猖獗的行为,那就是冒名行为,即假冒他人署名的行为,这是一种比盗版更加恶劣的行为。从古至今,无论是国内还是国外,冒名行为无时不在,无处不在。许多著名的作家、画家都曾遭遇过冒名的困扰。伪书、假画不仅使被冒名者的名誉和经济利益受损,而且严重扰乱了正常的市场秩序,损害了消费者的利益。从1995年我国首例“冒名”侵权案件开始,关于冒名行为是著作权侵权问题,还是民法上的姓名权侵权问题,抑或其他法律责任问题,学术界一直争议不断,难有定论。这一问题看似简单,实则复杂,涉及到一系列理论上没有解决、立法上尚不明确的问题,我国《著作权法》第47条规定冒名行为是侵权行为,但并没有明确其侵权的性质。在司法实践中,有法院认定为侵犯了姓名权,有法院认定为侵犯著作权中的署名权,也有法院认为这是一种不正当竞争行为。由于立法上不明确,学理上有争议,因此有必要对这一问题进行系统研究。本文拟从一则案例出发,对冒名行为侵权的性质及法律责任问题进行探讨。本文试图通过对周国平诉叶舟、李世化侵犯著作权案这一典型案例的分析,给司法实践提供帮助,同时提出完善规制冒名行为法律制度的建议。本文除引言和结语外,共分为五个部分,计17000字左右。第一部分,一则案例引发的思考。介绍了周国平诉叶舟、李世化侵犯著作权案的案情、争议焦点、争议意见与分歧。第二部分,冒名行为的界定。从冒名的主体、冒名的目的、冒名的手段等三个方面对冒名行为作了界定,同时对理论界和司法实务界关于冒名行为性质的不同观点作了阐述,包括侵害署名权说、侵害姓名权说、不正当竞争说,最后提出了本文的观点,指出以上几种学说都有缺陷,对冒名行为的性质应具体情况具体分析。第三部分,比较法上对冒名行为的规制。考察了大陆法系国家和地区、英美法系国家的现行法律和国际条约关于规制冒名行为的规定。第四部分,冒名行为的民事责任。首先分析了冒名行为侵权的构成要件,其次总结了冒名行为的民事责任,包括:停止侵害、恢复名誉、消除影响、赔礼道歉、赔偿损失。第五部分,我国规制冒名行为制度的完善。首先分析了我国现行法律规制冒名行为的现状,并指出了其中的不足,其次借鉴国外的立法及司法经验,提出了完善的建议。
[Abstract]:In real life, there is an act as rampant as piracy, that is, impersonation, that is, the act of impersonating another person's signature, which is worse than piracy. From ancient times, whether at home or abroad, impersonation is always around, everywhere. Many famous writers and painters have been beset by impersonation. Fake books and paintings not only damage the reputation and economic interests of the impostors, but also seriously disrupt the normal market order and the interests of consumers. Since 1995, the first case of "false name" infringement in our country, whether the act of impersonation is the infringement of copyright, the infringement of the right of name in civil law, or the question of other legal liability, the academic circles have been in constant dispute, it is difficult to come to a conclusion. This problem seems simple and complex, involving a series of problems which have not been solved theoretically and are not clear in legislation. Article 47 of copyright Law of our country stipulates that the act of impersonation is an act of infringement, but it does not clearly define the nature of its infringement. In judicial practice, some courts have found that the right of name has been infringed, some courts have found that the copyright has been infringed by the right of signature, and some courts have considered it an act of unfair competition. Because the legislation is unclear and the theory is controversial, it is necessary to study this problem systematically. This paper discusses the nature and legal liability of impersonation tort from a case. Through the analysis of the typical case of Zhou Guoping v. Ye Zhou and Li Shihua, this paper tries to provide help to the judicial practice, and at the same time puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legal system of impersonation. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts, about 17000 words. The first part, a case triggered by the thinking. This paper introduces the case of Zhou Guoping v. Ye Zhou, Li Shihua's case of copyright infringement, the focus of dispute, the opinions and differences. The second part, the definition of the act of impersonation. This paper defines the act of impersonation from three aspects: the subject of falsehood, the purpose of impersonation and the means of impersonation. At the same time, it expounds the different views on the nature of the act of impersonation, including the theory of infringement of the right of signature, and the judicial practice. The theory of infringing the right to name and the theory of unfair competition are put forward in the end of this paper. The author points out that the above theories all have defects, and the nature of the act of impersonation should be analyzed concretely. The third part is about the regulation of impersonation in comparative law. The current laws and international treaties in countries and regions of civil law system and common law system have been investigated on the regulation of impersonation. The fourth part, the civil liability of impersonation. First, it analyzes the constitutive elements of the act of impersonation, then summarizes the civil liability of the act of impersonation, including: stopping the infringement, restoring the reputation, eliminating the influence, apologizing and compensating for the loss. The fifth part, our country regulation impersonation behavior system consummation. Firstly, this paper analyzes the current situation of our country's current legal regulation of impersonation, and points out its shortcomings. Secondly, it draws lessons from foreign legislative and judicial experience and puts forward some perfect suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.41

【引证文献】