书法作品的著作权法保护——以茅盾先生手稿纠纷案为例

发布时间：2018-06-21 12:53

本文选题：书法作品 + 权利属性　；参考：《中国出版》2017年22期

【摘要】：书法作品属于美术作品,是我国《著作权法》保护的对象,但现行相关法律并没有明确书法作品的属性。关于书法作品的性质界定,理论上存在形式说、临摹说与抒发表现说等不同的观点。从本质上来讲,书法作品是作者利用书写工具与材质,表达其思想和情感的作品。在法律上,书法作品应当具有独创性、智力成果性与可复制性。在现有法律规定中,存在书法作品范围模糊、设定权利存在冲突等缺陷,应当通过相对明确独创性标准、遵循在先权利与利益协调的原则予以完善。
[Abstract]:Calligraphy works belong to art works and are protected by copyright Law of our country, but the current relevant laws do not clearly define the nature of calligraphy works. There are different views on the definition of the nature of calligraphy works, such as the theory of form, the theory of copying and the theory of expression. In essence, calligraphy works are works that the author uses writing tools and materials to express his thoughts and feelings. In law, calligraphy should be original, intellectual and replicable. In the existing laws and regulations, the scope of calligraphy works is vague, the right of creation has some defects such as conflict, and so on, which should be perfected through relatively clear and original standards and the principle of the coordination of prior rights and interests.
【作者单位】：河南科技大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会项目“精神障碍患者权利立法保护”(CLS2015D139) 河南省教育厅人文社科项目“医疗纠纷调处中心运行机制研究”(2016-GH-136)系列成果之一
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】