影响科技期刊审稿人审稿质量因素的研究
发布时间：2018-08-03 09:36
【摘要】： 审稿人是指从事稿件审读、评价、建议取舍,并对需要修改稿件提出修改的要求和建议的人员,其审稿意见是科技期刊主编和编辑录用稿件的重要参考依据,也是决定科技期刊学术质量的重要因素之一。审稿人的审稿质量是保证出版物学术质量的基础。在审稿过程中,审稿人由于受到各种不利因素的影响,使得审稿意见的撰写偏离了客观、公正、贴切的原则,为主编和编辑提供了不恰当的审稿意见,从而误导了主编和编辑的正确决策。因此,怎样避免这些不利因素对审稿人审稿质量的影响,更好地为主编和编辑提供高质量的审稿意见,使得优秀稿件脱颖而出,是国内外科技期刊主编和编辑共同关心的热点问题。 本研究综述了近年来有关影响科技期刊审稿人审稿质量的因素,通过文献综述法和专家咨询法将影响科技期刊审稿人审稿质量的因素归纳为审稿人的素质、审稿人的审稿心理、制度性因素(审稿单等)、审稿方式、稿件人情因素、审稿人的年龄、审稿人的健康状况、审稿费的多少、利益冲突、稿件本身质量、编辑部所送稿件与审稿人专业接近程度等11个影响因素。本研究采用自行设计的经专家论证的调查表,对部分科技期刊的审稿人进行了匿名式问卷调查,调查分析影响科技期刊审稿人审稿质量的主要因素及各因素对审稿人审稿质量的影响程度,探讨如何切实避免这些因素的措施,以数理方法筛选出影响审稿人审稿质量的主要因素,通过直线相关分析了解变量间的因果关系,通过回归分析进一步弄清楚各因素对审稿人审稿质量的影响程度,以期为科技期刊编辑部将更多的人力、物力、财力集中在对影响科技期刊审稿人审稿质量有重要影响的因素上,降低对影响较小的因素的关注,达到资源优化的目的。 为了切实避免各因素对科技期刊审稿人审稿质量的影响,本研究对调查结果进行了详尽分析,根据本研究结果提出了九大应对措施:⑴建立审稿质量评价机制,加强审稿人素质培训;⑵坚持稿件评审标准,规范审稿制度;⑶加强审稿人个人自身素养,提高自我心理调控能力;⑷科学合理的选择审稿方式;⑸加大制度性因素研究,不断修订和完善各种制度性因素;⑹动态地掌握审稿人的年龄和健康状况;⑺坚持稿件评审回避原则,加大审稿经费投入;⑻充分利用现代科技手段,加强稿件初审;⑼多途径了解审稿人专业,健全审稿人数据库。通过上述措施的提出,力求为科技期刊获得更多、更好的审稿意见,最终达到提高科技期刊整体学术质量的目的。
[Abstract]:A manuscript reviewer refers to a person who is engaged in reviewing, evaluating, recommending or accepting manuscripts and putting forward requests and suggestions for revision of manuscripts, the opinions of which are the important reference basis for editors and editors of sci-tech periodicals to accept manuscripts. It is also one of the important factors that determine the academic quality of sci-tech periodicals. The quality of manuscript reviewers is the basis to guarantee the academic quality of publications. In the process of reviewing manuscripts, due to the influence of various unfavorable factors, the reviewers' opinions deviate from the principles of objectivity, impartiality and relevance, and provide improper opinions for editors and editors. Thus mislead the editor and editor of the correct decision. Therefore, how to avoid the impact of these unfavorable factors on the quality of the reviewers, and how to better provide high-quality opinions for editors and editors, so that outstanding manuscripts stand out. It is a hot issue of common concern for editors and editors of science and technology periodicals at home and abroad. This study summarizes the factors that affect the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals in recent years. Through the methods of literature review and expert consultation, the factors affecting the quality of reviewers of sci-tech periodicals are summed up as the qualities of reviewers, and the reviewers' psychology of reviewing manuscripts. Institutional factors (review orders, etc.), ways of reviewing manuscripts, human factors of manuscripts, age of reviewers, health status of reviewers, amount of fees for reviewing manuscripts, conflicts of interest, quality of manuscripts themselves, Editorial department contribution and reviewer professional proximity to 11 factors. In this study, an anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among the reviewers of some scientific and technological journals with a self-designed questionnaire, which was verified by experts. This paper investigates and analyzes the main factors that affect the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals and the degree to which each factor affects the quality of reviewers of manuscripts, and probes into the measures to avoid these factors in practice. The main factors affecting the reviewer's manuscript quality are screened by mathematical method, and the causality among variables is understood by linear correlation analysis, and the degree of influence of each factor on the reviewer's manuscript quality is further clarified by regression analysis. It is expected that more manpower, material resources and financial resources will be concentrated on the factors that have an important influence on the quality of the reviewers' manuscripts for the editorial department of sci-tech periodicals, so as to reduce the attention to the less influential factors and to achieve the purpose of optimizing the resources. In order to avoid the influence of various factors on the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals, this study makes a detailed analysis of the results of the investigation, and puts forward nine measures to evaluate the quality of manuscripts: 1, according to the results of this study. Strengthen the quality training of reviewers and insist on the evaluation standard of manuscripts, standardize the system of reviewing manuscripts, strengthen the self-accomplishment of individual reviewers, improve the ability of self-psychological control and improve the ability of scientific and reasonable selection and review of manuscripts, and increase the research on institutional factors. Constantly revise and perfect all kinds of institutional factors 6 dynamically grasp the age and health of the reviewers and adhere to the principle of review and avoidance of manuscripts, increase the input of funds for the review of manuscripts and make full use of modern scientific and technological means to strengthen the preliminary examination of manuscripts; Many ways to understand the professional reviewers, improve the manuscript reviewer database. Through the above measures, we try our best to obtain more and better opinions for scientific and technological journals, and finally achieve the goal of improving the overall academic quality of sci-tech periodicals.
【学位授予单位】：第三军医大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：G237.5
本文编号：2161336
[Abstract]:A manuscript reviewer refers to a person who is engaged in reviewing, evaluating, recommending or accepting manuscripts and putting forward requests and suggestions for revision of manuscripts, the opinions of which are the important reference basis for editors and editors of sci-tech periodicals to accept manuscripts. It is also one of the important factors that determine the academic quality of sci-tech periodicals. The quality of manuscript reviewers is the basis to guarantee the academic quality of publications. In the process of reviewing manuscripts, due to the influence of various unfavorable factors, the reviewers' opinions deviate from the principles of objectivity, impartiality and relevance, and provide improper opinions for editors and editors. Thus mislead the editor and editor of the correct decision. Therefore, how to avoid the impact of these unfavorable factors on the quality of the reviewers, and how to better provide high-quality opinions for editors and editors, so that outstanding manuscripts stand out. It is a hot issue of common concern for editors and editors of science and technology periodicals at home and abroad. This study summarizes the factors that affect the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals in recent years. Through the methods of literature review and expert consultation, the factors affecting the quality of reviewers of sci-tech periodicals are summed up as the qualities of reviewers, and the reviewers' psychology of reviewing manuscripts. Institutional factors (review orders, etc.), ways of reviewing manuscripts, human factors of manuscripts, age of reviewers, health status of reviewers, amount of fees for reviewing manuscripts, conflicts of interest, quality of manuscripts themselves, Editorial department contribution and reviewer professional proximity to 11 factors. In this study, an anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted among the reviewers of some scientific and technological journals with a self-designed questionnaire, which was verified by experts. This paper investigates and analyzes the main factors that affect the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals and the degree to which each factor affects the quality of reviewers of manuscripts, and probes into the measures to avoid these factors in practice. The main factors affecting the reviewer's manuscript quality are screened by mathematical method, and the causality among variables is understood by linear correlation analysis, and the degree of influence of each factor on the reviewer's manuscript quality is further clarified by regression analysis. It is expected that more manpower, material resources and financial resources will be concentrated on the factors that have an important influence on the quality of the reviewers' manuscripts for the editorial department of sci-tech periodicals, so as to reduce the attention to the less influential factors and to achieve the purpose of optimizing the resources. In order to avoid the influence of various factors on the quality of manuscripts reviewers of sci-tech periodicals, this study makes a detailed analysis of the results of the investigation, and puts forward nine measures to evaluate the quality of manuscripts: 1, according to the results of this study. Strengthen the quality training of reviewers and insist on the evaluation standard of manuscripts, standardize the system of reviewing manuscripts, strengthen the self-accomplishment of individual reviewers, improve the ability of self-psychological control and improve the ability of scientific and reasonable selection and review of manuscripts, and increase the research on institutional factors. Constantly revise and perfect all kinds of institutional factors 6 dynamically grasp the age and health of the reviewers and adhere to the principle of review and avoidance of manuscripts, increase the input of funds for the review of manuscripts and make full use of modern scientific and technological means to strengthen the preliminary examination of manuscripts; Many ways to understand the professional reviewers, improve the manuscript reviewer database. Through the above measures, we try our best to obtain more and better opinions for scientific and technological journals, and finally achieve the goal of improving the overall academic quality of sci-tech periodicals.
【学位授予单位】：第三军医大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：G237.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 梁丽;张洋;;专家审稿存在的问题分析及解决措施[J];中国科技信息;2009年12期
2 陈进寿;从人际关系谈同行评议制的改进[J];中国科学基金;2002年03期
3 栾奕;王晓阳;吴欣欣;王颖;;医学期刊“人情稿件”及处理[J];中国煤炭工业医学杂志;2008年11期
，本文编号：2161336
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2161336.html
