初审在科技期刊编辑工作中的重要性——以《水生生物学报》为例

发布时间：2018-09-07 16:18

【摘要】：初审作为决定稿件的去留的第一道关卡,也是期刊质量把关的首要环节。初审在科技期刊编辑工作中占有重要的地位,科技期刊编辑需要以公平、严谨和专业的态度来对待每一篇稿件的初审工作。科技期刊编辑首先需要考察稿件研究方向是否符合期刊报道范围、稿件写作水平是否达到标准,核实是否存在学术不端行为,再进一步评判研究是否具有创新性以及学术价值如何等,进而及时淘汰达不到期刊发表标准的稿件,筛选出相对优秀的稿件进入后续的审稿流程。《水生生物学报》的初审工作分为由青年学术编辑负责的编辑部初审以及由主编和副主编负责的主编初审两部分。通过两轮初审的层层把关,可以最大限度保证进入外审阶段的稿件的质量,减轻编辑部和外审专家对后期稿件处理的工作量,降低外审退稿率,从而提高期刊整体质量。
[Abstract]:As the first level to decide whether the manuscripts should stay or not, the first examination is also the primary link of periodical quality control. The first review plays an important role in the editing of sci-tech periodicals. The editors of sci-tech periodicals need to treat each manuscript in a fair, rigorous and professional manner. Editors of sci-tech journals should first investigate whether the research direction of manuscripts conforms to the scope of periodical reports, whether the writing level of manuscripts is up to the standard, and whether there is any academic misconduct. To further judge whether the research is innovative and of academic value, and to eliminate in time manuscripts that do not meet the standard of publication of periodicals. The first review of the Journal of Aquatic Biology was divided into two parts: the editorial department responsible by the young academic editor and the editor in chief and the deputy chief editor. The quality of manuscripts in the stage of external review can be guaranteed to the maximum extent through the layer by layer check of two rounds of first instance, the workload of the editorial department and the experts of external review on the handling of late manuscripts can be reduced, the rejection rate of external review can be reduced, and the overall quality of periodicals can be improved.
【作者单位】：中国科学院水生生物研究所《水生生物学报》编辑部;
【基金】：中国科协精品科技期刊工程学术质量提升项目
【分类号】：G232

【相似文献】