土壤肥料类论文中多重比较的常见问题分析
发布时间：2018-09-13 10:18
【摘要】：在《中国土壤与肥料》稿件的评审、编校和对已发表论文的审读时,发现一些论文中多重比较存在方法误用、结果表达缺陷和错误以及结果分析不够严谨和深入等问题。本文结合一些实例剖析了上述问题及其产生原因,并提出相应的修正措施。为避免此类问题再次出现,建议编辑加强统计学知识学习,强化统计学内容审核,建立期刊统计学审核标准,依照标准规范论文写作与修改。
[Abstract]:In the review, editing and reading of Chinese soil and Fertilizer, it is found that the multiple comparisons in some papers have some problems, such as the misuse of methods, the defects and errors in the expression of the results, and the lack of rigorous and in-depth analysis of the results. In this paper, some examples are given to analyze the above problems and their causes, and the corresponding correction measures are put forward. In order to avoid the recurrence of such problems, it is suggested that editors should strengthen the study of statistical knowledge, strengthen the audit of statistical contents, establish standards for statistical audit of periodicals, and standardize the writing and revision of papers according to the standards.
【作者单位】： 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;
【分类号】：G232
本文编号：2240892
[Abstract]:In the review, editing and reading of Chinese soil and Fertilizer, it is found that the multiple comparisons in some papers have some problems, such as the misuse of methods, the defects and errors in the expression of the results, and the lack of rigorous and in-depth analysis of the results. In this paper, some examples are given to analyze the above problems and their causes, and the corresponding correction measures are put forward. In order to avoid the recurrence of such problems, it is suggested that editors should strengthen the study of statistical knowledge, strengthen the audit of statistical contents, establish standards for statistical audit of periodicals, and standardize the writing and revision of papers according to the standards.
【作者单位】： 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所;
【分类号】：G232
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 ;欢迎订阅2001年《土壤肥料》[J];磷肥与复肥;2000年05期
2 ;《土壤肥料》致读者、作者和广告厂家[J];土壤肥料;2000年04期
，本文编号：2240892
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/chubanfaxing/2240892.html
