中国学刊“走出去”的理论误区与路径抉择——以大学学报为切入点

发布时间：2019-02-13 10:12

【摘要】：第一,学术期刊"专业化""数字化""去同质化"与"特色化"是理论误区因而不能成立,学术期刊履行使命必须排除"四化论"的干扰;第二,学报"四化论"客观上使得各个学术期刊做朝三暮四式的稿源争夺,必然导致对学术期刊使命的淡漠与忘却,致使中国学术期刊陷入理论认识误区,因此必须正确认识学术编辑在学术活动、学术期刊工作中的地位与作用,因为学术期刊出版规律不以编辑意志为转移;第三,对学术期刊使命的漠视必然导致中国学术期刊迟迟不能"走出去",这极大地伤害了中国学术期刊与学术事业,因此,应当科学认识学术期刊使命,学术期刊编辑必须强化使命担当,履职尽责;第四,中国学术期刊"走出去"的路径首先是学术期刊使命应当回归本位,其次是中国学术期刊评价体系必须改弦更张,必须明晰中国学术期刊改革的这些路径抉择。
[Abstract]:First, "specialization", "digitization", "de-homogeneity" and "characteristic" of academic journals are theoretical misunderstandings and cannot be established, so the interference of "four modernizations" must be eliminated for academic journals to fulfill their mission. Secondly, the "four modernizations" of the journal objectively make each academic journal compete for manuscripts, which will inevitably lead to the indifference and forgetting of the mission of the academic journal, and cause the Chinese academic journal to fall into a theoretical misunderstanding. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly understand the position and role of academic editors in academic activities and in the work of academic journals, because the publishing rules of academic journals do not change with the editorial will. Third, the neglect of the mission of academic journals will inevitably lead to the tardy "going out" of Chinese academic journals, which has greatly harmed Chinese academic journals and academic undertakings. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the mission of academic journals scientifically. Editors of academic journals must strengthen their mission and perform their duties with due diligence. Fourth, the path of "going out" for Chinese academic journals is firstly that the mission of academic journals should return to the standard, secondly, the evaluation system of Chinese academic journals must be changed, and the choices of these paths for the reform of Chinese academic journals must be clear.
【作者单位】：山东理工大学学报(社会科学版)编辑部;朔州广播电视台;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“中西方学术期刊出版机制比较研究”(10BXW011)
【分类号】：G237.5

【相似文献】